SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomaterials
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1630495
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvanced Technologies for Oral and Craniomaxillofacial TherapyView all 14 articles
EFFECTIVENESS OF BONE EXPANSION, COMPACTING AND DENSIFICATION IN NARROW ALVEOLAR CRESTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND A META-ANALYSIS
Provisionally accepted
- University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The treatment of edentulism with dental implants is a common and reliable procedure with high medium-and long-term survival rates. Primary stability in the bone is vitally important to prevent micro-movements at the beginning of healing. However, the main drawback of dental implantology is bone deficiency. To alleviate this situation, clinicians' resort to surgical techniques that increase bone volume and allow the devices to be placed. Bone expansion, compaction, and densification are used to compact the bone trabeculae, densifying the bone and improving the primary stability and osseointegration of implants. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of these surgical techniques in deficient alveolar ridges in order to prepare them to receive durable dental implants. Methods: Searches were made of the PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source and Web of Science (WOS) databases and GreyNet International, to identify RCTs, prospective studies, retrospective studies and case series published in English in the last 15 years, which evaluated the efficacy of bone expansion, bone compaction and densification in narrow alveolar ridges and their impact on bone density (BD), alveolar ridge expansion (CE) and implant stability quotient (ISQ). Methodological quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute for RCTs (JBI MAStARI) tool and risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2), and meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software to calculate effect size and integrate the results of the included studies. Results: Ten of the 2464 studies examined met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of the parameters analyzed was favorable for the experimental group, indicating that bone expansion, compaction and densification techniques significantly increase DB (-0.71, 95% CI (Confidence Interval) [-1.15 to -0.27], p = 0.002), EC (-1.12, 95% CI [-2.21 to -0.03], p = 0.04) and ISQ ], p = 0.0005), with a high publication bias for CE and ISQ. Conclusions: The techniques of bone expansion, compaction and densification demonstrated their effectiveness in narrow alveolar ridges, although studies are needed to validate the results found.
Keywords: narrow alveolar ridge1, crestal expansion2, threaded expanders3, osteotomes4, bone compaction5, bone densification6
Received: 17 May 2025; Accepted: 16 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 López-Valverde, López-Valverde and Blanco. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Antonio López-Valverde, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.