ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomechanics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1635514
Implementation of the Sensory Organization Test with the CAREN System: A Pilot Study
Provisionally accepted- 1IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, Messina, Italy
- 2IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy
- 3Universita degli Studi di Messina Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Messina, Italy
- 4Universita degli Studi di Messina Dipartimento di Scienze biomediche odontoiatriche e delle immagini morfologiche e funzionali, Messina, Italy
- 5Fondazione Santa Lucia Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
- 6Istituto Auxologico Italiano Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy
- 7Universita degli Studi di Milano Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Milano, Italy
- 8Universita degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata Dipartimento di Biologia, Rome, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
ABSTRACT Introduction The Sensory Organization Test (SOT) is a clinical and instrumental tool designed to assess postural stability by measuring body sway during standing under different sensory feedback conditions. This study explores the implementation of the SOT using the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) system, aiming to enhance balance assessment and extend the diagnostic applications available for CAREN. Methods A software application (CAREN-SOT) was developed to implement the SOT using the CAREN, which features a six degrees of freedom motion platform, force sensors, a 3D motion capture system, and an immersive visual environment. Eight healthy participants (ages 23-40, four males) underwent the SOT across six conditions, using either optic motion capture or force plate inputs to estimate the sway of the body center of mass. A generalized linear mixed model was employed to analyze equilibrium scores (ESs) from both modalities, considering system's latency and responsiveness. Results CAREN-SOT implementation was possible using both input modalities. No statistically significant differences were found between the optoelectronic and force plate modalities in measuring postural stability across conditions. Comparison with normative data from the NeuroCom™EquiTest™system suggested equivalence in key SOT metrics, despite minor variations in ESs likely due to methodological differences and sample size. De Pasquale et al. Implementation of the Sensory Organization Test with the CAREN System Discussion By integrating advanced technological and customization capabilities, CAREN-SOT provides an immersive, controlled environment for postural stability assessment. While findings must be validated on a larger sample, they support CAREN-SOT's utility in diagnostic and rehabilitative settings. Future research directions include expanding normative datasets and exploring mediolateral sway to increase our understanding of postural control mechanisms.
Keywords: CAREN, Sensory Organization Test, balance, EquiTest, Rehabilitation
Received: 26 May 2025; Accepted: 02 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 De Pasquale, Ielo, De Marchis, Borzelli, Casile, Caronni, Scarano, Calabr, TESIO, Quartarone and d'Avella. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Augusto Ielo, augusto.ielo@irccsme.it
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.