Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1642787

Biomechanically Optimized 3D-Printed Titanium Prostheses with Stiffener Arrangement for Critical Femoral Diaphyseal Defects: Early Weight-Bearing Capacity and Combat Readiness Validated Through Integrated Biomechanical-FEA Approach

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
  • 2908th Hospital of People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, China
  • 3Chinese People's Liberation Army Western Theater General Hospital, Chengdu, China
  • 4The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 5920th Hospital of People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Kunming, China
  • 6the People's Hospital of Yingtan, Yingtan, China
  • 7Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Critical femoral diaphyseal defects exceeding 3 cm present significant challenges in trauma and military orthopedics, particularly in blast injury scenarios requiring rapid rehabilitation. The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the biomechanical in vitro performance of two personalized prostheses (Groups A and B) designed explicitly for critical femoral diaphyseal defects through integrated biomechanical testing and finite element analysis (FEA). Using fourth-generation composite femurs simulating 10cm defects (n=16), we compared axial compression, torsion, fourpoint bending stiffness, and cyclic fatigue performance against intact bones (Group D) and diaphyseal fractures without defects (Group C).Key findings demonstrate comparable compressive stiffness between prostheses groups (Group A: 764.12±112.63 N/mm; Group B: 693.63±136.31 N/mm) and intact femurs (808.59±18.1 N/mm, p>0.05). The torsional stiffness is comparable between prostheses groups (Group A: 2.28±0.15 Nm/°; Group B: 2.18±0.22 Nm/°) versus diaphyseal fractures without defects (2.01±0.19 Nm/°). The stiffness results comply with mobilization requirements. FEA revealed maximum von Mises stresses in prosthesis fixation systems below the yield strength of Ti6Al4V, with digital image correlation validating the stress distribution patterns. The porous scaffold design achieved optimal modulus (1,132.85 MPa) between cortical and cancellous bone, reducing the "stress shielding" effect. Both prostheses endured 1800N cyclic loading (100,000 cycles ≈ , 13.3 years of physiological use) without structural failure.These customized prostheses address critical military medical needs by enabling immediate weightbearing, reducing surgical complexity compared to bone transport techniques, and maintaining longterm mechanical integrity. The stiffener design philosophy and additive manufacturing flexibility provide adaptable solutions for complex combat-related trauma, significantly advancing early functional recovery in resource-constrained environments.

Keywords: 3D-printed prosthesis, Critical bone defect, Finite Element Analysis, Biomechanical compatibility, Military trauma, Stiffener, Titanium alloy

Received: 07 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Li, Liu, Yi, Cui, Lao, Nie, Zhao, Du, Xu and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Cheng-Fei Du, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China
Yong-Qing Xu, 920th Hospital of People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Kunming, China
Jiang-Jun Zhou, 908th Hospital of People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Nanchang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.