Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1644261

This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing Sports Injury Management through Medical-Engineering InnovationsView all 14 articles

Predicting the risk of postoperative avascular necrosis in patients with talar fractures based on an interpretable machine learning model

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo, China
  • 2Southeast University Zhongda Hospital Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing, China
  • 3Ningbo University, Ningbo, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Purpose: This study aims to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting avascular necrosis (AVN) following talar fracture, thereby aiding in personalized prevention and treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing surgical intervention for talar fractures at Ningbo No.6 Hospital between January 2018 and December 2023. Multidimensional data encompassing demographic characteristics, fracture-related variables, surgery-related parameters, and follow-up information were collected. Patients were randomly allocated to the training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Potential risk factors for postoperative AVN were screened using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Six machine learning algorithms were employed to construct the prediction models. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated utilizing metrics including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), precision, recall, and F1 score. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provided global and local explanations for the optimal model. Results: A total of 207 patients with talar fractures were enrolled in our study, with 45 (21.74%) developed AVN, and 162 (78.26%) did not. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression identified six independent risk factors including body mass index (BMI), fracture classification, concomitant ipsilateral foot and ankle fractures, smoking, quality of fracture reduction, and fracture type. Performance evaluation demonstrated that Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost model) achieved high AUC values with superior specificity and sensitivity in both the training and testing sets. The SHAP was performed to analyze the relative importance of features within the model visually and illustrate the impact of each feature on individual patient outcomes. Conclusions: This study successfully developed and validated an interpretable machine learning model incorporating key clinical and surgical variables to predict AVN following talar fractures. The prediction model identified high-risk patients and critical modifiable factors, facilitating personalized prevention strategies to mitigate this severe complication.

Keywords: machine learning, Risk factors, Prediction model, Avascular necrosis, Talar fractures

Received: 10 Jun 2025; Accepted: 18 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Xu, Yu, Chen, Hong, Zhang, Wang and Shen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Songou Zhang, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
Xin Wang, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo, China
Chengchun Shen, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.