Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Finite element analysis of biomechanical effects in rat tibia during tibial cortex transverse transport

Provisionally accepted
Zhen  PuxiangZhen Puxiang1,2Jie  LiuJie Liu2Hongjie  SuHongjie Su2Wencong  QinWencong Qin1Yi  DingYi Ding2Shenghui  YangShenghui Yang1Lu  WeiLu Wei1Ruiqing  MoRuiqing Mo2Xinyu  NieXinyu Nie3*Qikai  HuaQikai Hua1,2*
  • 1Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
  • 3Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) poses a major clinical burden. This study, for the first time, establishes and validates a finite element (FE) biomechanical model of tibial cortex transverse transport (TTT) in diabetic rats. By integrating micro-CT data at multiple time points, we provide a novel computational approach to assess the biomechanical safety and stability of TTT, thus bridging preclinical animal research and potential clinical translation. Methods: This study utilized a customized transverse osteotomy transport frame to establish a model of TTT for treating lower limb ischemic ulcer in diabetic rats. Postoperatively, the tibiae and fibulae Dicom were harvested by ex-vivo micro-CT scaning. The imaging data are processed and analyzed using mechanical analysis software by Mimics, 3-matic Medical, Geomagic Studio, Hypermesh, MSC.Patran, and MSC. Nastran to simulate the loading characteristics of the rat's tibia and fibula with the TTT. Results: 1. Peak von Mises stresses in the transport tibial bone fragment under axial compression, axial torsion, and three-point bending, showed no significant differences between postoperative time points (3, 6, 9, 12, and 30 days), indicating that the overall stress change in the tibia during the tibial transverse transport process is minimal. 2. Over 8-week healing period, dynamic load sharing occurred among the transported bone fragment, original tibia, and adjustable external fixator. Progressive healing of the transported bone fragment with the surrounding bone tissue reduced the structural bearing stress of the adjustable TTT fixation. The overall stiffness of the tibia increases as the transported fragment and tibia gradually restore, further enhancing the stability of the overall tibia. 3. Under biomechanical testing conditions including axial compression, axial torsion, and three-point bending, the application of adjustable external fixators successfully repositioned free bone fragments to their anatomical alignment in the tibia without exceeding the ultimate yield strength of cortical bone tissue. Secondary fracture initiation or catastrophic structural failure was not observed during testing. The current experimental results shows the TTT fixation satisfies the required strength criteria for rat experiment. Conclusion: The TTT rat model demonstrated biomechanical stability and surgical safety in silico, supporting its translational potential. However, further experimental validation is required.

Keywords: Tibial cortex transverse transport, Diabetic Rats, Finite Element Analysis, Safety, stability

Received: 21 Jul 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Puxiang, Liu, Su, Qin, Ding, Yang, Wei, Mo, Nie and Hua. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Xinyu Nie, xnie1@bwh.harvard.edu
Qikai Hua, hqk100@sr.gxmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.