ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomechanics
For Severe and Rigid Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis, Does an Optimal Extent of Posterior Intervertebral Release Exist? A Finite Element Analysis
Provisionally accepted
- 1First Clinical Medical College of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
- 2Orthopedic, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The surgical management of severe, rigid adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) is challenging. While posterior intervertebral release (PIVR) is used to enhance correction, the optimal number of release segments is unknown. This study aimed to identify the optimal PIVR strategy by evaluating the biomechanical effects of varying release levels. Methods: A patient-specific finite element (FE) model of a Lenke 2A+ AdIS spine (T1-sacrum, main thoracic curve 84°) was created and validated. Six surgical scenarios were simulated: instrumentation-only (M1), Ponte osteotomy alone (M2), and M2 combined with four different PIVR strategies (M3-M6). Simulated corrective forces were applied, and outcomes, including Cobb angle correction and von-Mises stress on vertebrae and implants, were analyzed and compared. Results: A targeted 4-level PIVR centered on the apex (M5) achieved the greatest main thoracic curve correction, reducing the Cobb angle from 84° to 34.88° (a 58.5% correction rate). A more extensive 6-level release (M6) proved less effective (38.99°, 53.6% correction rate). Model M5 also produced the most significant reduction in peak von-Mises stress on vertebrae (15.9% decrease vs. M2) and pedicle screws (32.9% decrease vs. M2). Conclusion: A selective, 4-level PIVR strategy provides superior deformity correction and a more favorable stress environment than a more extensive release. These findings challenge the "more is better" paradigm, providing a biomechanical rationale for an "optimal" rather than "maximal" release approach in severe rigid AdIS.
Keywords: adult idiopathic scoliosis, Finite Element Analysis, posterior intervertebralrelease, Ponteosteotomy, optimalrelease
Received: 23 Aug 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Zhang, Liu, Rong, Liang and Ge. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Zhaohui Ge, myovid@126.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.