Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Correction Technique for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Finite Element Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Ani  ShiAni Shi1,2Rong  MaRong Ma2Zhiqiang  WangZhiqiang Wang3Xiaoyin  LiuXiaoyin Liu2Jianqun  ZhangJianqun Zhang2Zhaohui  GeZhaohui Ge4*
  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
  • 2Department of Orthopaedics, The First Clinical Medical College of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
  • 3Department of Orthopaedics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
  • 4The First Clinical Medical College of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Purpose: To introduce a novel surgical technique, the Simultaneous Double-Rod Reverse Derotation (SDRRD), and to compare its corrective outcomes and biomechanical performance with traditional surgery using finite element analysis. Materials and methods: Three finite element models, including the the single-rod fixed pedicle screw model (M1), the double-rod polyaxial pedicle screw model (M2), and the double-rod monoplane pedicle screw model (M3) were constructed using CT data from a Lenke 1 C N adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient. The rod rotation technique was applied in M1 and M2, while the SDRRD technique was implemented in M3. The surgical outcomes in three dimensions and the biomechanical outcomes in the spine and implants were investigated following the simulation of the corrective process. Result: Regarding correction efficacy, M2 and M3 overmatched M1 in the coronal and sagittal planes, while M3 achieved superior axial rotation correction compared to M1 and M2. The stress on the apical vertebra is most considerable, while that on the lower instrumented vertebra is lowest in the vertebrae and intervertebral discs across M1 to M3. A considerable stress reduction is observed from M1 to M3 in most regions, with the highest stress in M1 and the lowest in M3. There is no considerable difference in the maximum stress of the implants among the three groups. Conclusion: The SDRRD technique yields favourable outcomes in coronal and sagittal plane correction, particularly in reducing axial rotation. Moreover, SDRRD effectively minimizes the stress experienced by the vertebrae and intervertebral discs.

Keywords: novel surgery, Derotation, Biomechanics, complication, degeneration

Received: 25 Aug 2025; Accepted: 13 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Shi, Ma, Wang, Liu, Zhang and Ge. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhaohui Ge, myovid@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.