Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioinform.

Sec. Network Bioinformatics

Network pharmacology refined with non-ubiquity and decoy-controlled molecular docking reveals insights into Moringa oleifera phytochemicals targeting insulin resistance

Provisionally accepted
  • Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Moringa oleifera phytochemicals were predicted to target insulin resistance proteins using a modified network pharmacology and molecular docking approach. Two hundred ninety M. oleifera phytochemicals with their aglycones, acetylase and myrosinase degradation products were compiled from literature and phytochemical databases. Nine protein targets were identified from the intersection of gene lists with high relevance to insulin resistance from GeneCards and DisGeNET and the target genes predicted by reverse screening using Swiss Target Prediction: protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTPN1), 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 (HSD11B1), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), PI3-kinase p85-alpha subunit (PIK3R1), insulin receptor (INSR), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and hepatic lipase (LIPC). Binding affinities of phytochemicals with the targets were predicted using Autodock Vina. The predicted binding affinities were classified according to calculated thresholds using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) calculations of binding affinities of: (a) binders (annotated drugs and other molecules with known interaction with each target), and (b) decoys (molecules not expected to bind to a specific target). In addition, ubiquitous phytochemicals were filtered out to differentiate the effect on insulin resistance of M. oleifera from that of other plants. The resulting phytochemical-protein interaction network was visualized using Cytoscape. All mentioned targets, except hepatic lipase, were key targets based on various network centrality measures. Previous studies on murine models have shown that isothiocyanate-rich M. oleifera extracts ameliorate insulin resistance. Using our approach, the following phytochemicals, with predicted moderate bioavailability, high GI absorption, and probable binding with insulin resistance targets, are recommended for further in vivo or in vitro validation for insulin resistance activity: boldione (a steroid); aurantiamide acetate and aurantiamide (peptide derivatives); O-ethyl-[(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)methyl] carbamothioate and O-methyl-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl] carbamothioate (thiocarbamates); 4α,6α-dihydroxyeudesman-8β,12-olide (a sesquiterpenoid); sanleng acid and tianshic acid (fatty acid derivatives); 2',5,5',7-tetrahydroxyflavone; 2',3,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone; and 6-hydroxykaempferol (flavonoids). By combining network centrality measures of targets, using ROC-derived thresholds for docking energies, and considering ubiquity of phytochemicals, our refined network pharmacology approach may aid in discovering key bioactive phytochemicals as potential chemical markers for standardization and differentiation of an herbal drug.

Keywords: Decoys, Insulin Resistance, Moringa oleifera, Network Pharmacology, network visualization, protein docking, receiver operating characteristic (ROC)

Received: 28 Nov 2025; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Santos-Enriquez, Dayrit, De Jesus and Rojas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Nina Rosario L. Rojas

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.