Abstract
Background:
Bilateral ductus arteriosus (BDA) is a relatively rare vascular malformation. According to the double arch theory, BDA is formed when the distal ends of the sixth pairs of primitive arches on the left and right sides have not regressed. We describe a fetus with prenatal echocardiographic findings of BDA and right aortic arch mirror-image branching (RAA-MIB) combined with congenital heart disease. Furthermore, to gain a deeper understanding of the embryological mechanism of BDA, we review the literature on all combinations of BDA present in 40 fetuses/infants.
Case summary:
A 22-year-old female patient underwent fetal echocardiography at 23 weeks of gestation. Both the two-dimensional (2D) grayscale image and color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) revealed dextro-transposition of the great arteries combined with a ventricular septal defect and RAA-MIB. The following scan revealed a rare vascular ring, which was identified as BDA extending from the confluent of the left pulmonary artery and right pulmonary artery, completely encircling the trachea to form an “O”-shaped vascular ring before finally converging into the descending aorta. A persistent left superior vena cava was also observed. We subsequently used four-dimensional (4D) color Doppler imaging with the spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) HD live flow and STIC HD live flow silhouette mode to clearly display ventricular arterial connectivity and the direction of vessel travel. Adjusting the image quality and display angle is very important when applying STIC. The 4D images confirmed our diagnosis. After multidisciplinary counseling and discussion with her family, this female patient decided to terminate the pregnancy.
Conclusion:
Our review of the literature summarized nine combinations classified into three types of BDA and aortic arch pathology. However, our case differs because it is a novel combination of intracardiac structural abnormalities and vascular rings in a fetus. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of BDA is important and requires a combination of 2D grayscale, CDFI, and STIC images to assist in scanning.
1 Introduction
Bilateral ductus arteriosus (BDA) is a relatively rare vascular malformation. In most neonatal cases, BDA is not patented and is accompanied by pulmonary atresia (PA) and a non-confluent pulmonary artery. Based on Edward's hypothesis of the double arch theory, BDA forms when the distal ends of the sixth pairs of primitive arches on the left and right sides have not regressed ().
We describe the case of a fetus with prenatal echocardiographic findings of BDA and right aortic arch mirror-image branching (RAA-MIB), in addition to dextro-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA) and a persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC). This rare vascular ring is likely to compress the trachea and esophagus. We report a novel association between intracardiac structural abnormalities and vascular rings in a fetus. Furthermore, we review the literature on all combinations of BDA in fetuses and infants to gain a deeper understanding of the embryological mechanism of BDA and to highlight the novel combination of BDA observed in the present case.
2 Case presentation
A 22-year-old female patient, Gravida 3, Para 2 (G3P2), underwent fetal echocardiography at 23 weeks of gestation. Both the two-dimensional (2D) grayscale image and color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) revealed cardiac structural abnormalities. The 2D grayscale imaging showed that the main pulmonary artery (MPA) originated from the left ventricle (LV) and could be seen overriding the interventricular septum, with left and right blood vessels separating at the distal end (Figure 1A). Furthermore, the aorta (Ao) was shown to originate completely from the right ventricle (RV) (Figure 1B). The above signs indicated that the fetus had d-TGA combined with a ventricular septal defect (VSD). 2D grayscale combined with CDFI showed that the Ao was located on the right side of the trachea and that the first blood vessel originating from the Ao was the left innominate artery (LINA) (Figure 1C), which was toward the left shoulder of the fetus. Subsequently, the left common carotid artery (LCCA) and left subclavian artery (LSA) were separated (Figure 1D), indicating RAA-MIB (Supplementary Video S1). The following scan revealed a rare vascular ring, which extended from the confluent of the left pulmonary artery (LPA) and right pulmonary artery (RPA) to the left and right ductus arteriosus (LDA and RDA), converging into the descending aorta (DAo). Therefore, the BDA completely encircled the trachea, forming an “O”-shaped vascular ring (Figures 1E,F, Supplementary Video S1). In addition, a PLSVC was observed; the 2D grayscale longitudinal plane showed that this vessel converged into the coronary sinus (CS) (Figure 1G). We have provided a pattern diagram to help understand this case (Supplementary Figure S1).
Figure 1
To better visualize the spatial effect, we used a four-dimensional (4D) color Doppler with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) HD live flow mode (Voluson E10, GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) to clearly display ventricular arterial connectivity and the direction of vessel travel. From this three-dimensional (3D) image, it can be inferred that in the d-TGA, the RAA with LDA formed a “U”-shaped vascular ring. At this point, the RDA was located immediately below the RAA and could only be observed with flickering of the RDA in certain cardiac cycles (Figure 2A, Supplementary Video S2).
Figure 2
Furthermore, we utilized the STIC HD live flow Silhouette mode (CFM Silhou.90, CFM thresh.30, Transp. CFM 20) to identify the RDA hidden beneath the RAA via a posterior view, which required adjustments in the image quality and angle when applying STIC. The LDA and RDA originated from the proximal end of the LPA and RPA, respectively, and converged into the DAo. Different blood flow directions could help distinguish between pulmonary arteries and veins. Due to angle factors, only the first branch of the Ao could be seen (Figure 2B, Supplementary Video S3). Following multidisciplinary counseling and discussions with her family, this female patient decided to terminate her pregnancy and refused to undergo genetic testing.
3 Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of BDA combined with RAA-MIB. Furthermore, there are no reports of the above combined with d-TGA, as shown in the pattern diagram (Supplementary Figure S1). As known, an “O”-shaped vascular ring often occurs in a double aortic arch. Usually, the right side arch is larger than the left side arch; however, the “O”-shaped vascular ring in our case showed that the diameters of the DA on both sides were almost identical. This was a good identification point on ultrasound images, and the spatial position of the DA was lower than that of the aortic arch. In more than 98% of cases, the RAA-MIB is closely related to cardiac abnormalities, including tetralogy of Fallot, persistent truncus arteriosus, and d-TGA (, ). Our case is consistent with the facts reported in the literature.
The embryological mechanism of development of the aortic arch has always been supported by Edward's theory, namely, the double aortic arch system (). The value of this theory lies in its ability to explain the potential contribution of almost all embryonic arches to the final adult arch system components (). As shown in Figure 3A, this is a complex process of development and regression. The primitive aorta is composed of ventral and dorsal parts. Six pairs of primitive arch arteries develop between the ventral and dorsal aortae. The dorsal aortae also give rise to the seventh intersegmental arteries. The appearance and degeneration of the primitive arch artery do not occur simultaneously. Ultimately, the first, second, and fifth pairs of primitive arch arteries degenerate. In normal development, the right proximal sixth arch continues to exist as the proximal part of the RPA, while its distal part degenerates as the DA, in addition to partial degeneration of the right dorsal aorta (dotted line in Figure 3A). The primitive third, fourth, and sixth pairs of arch arteries contribute to the common carotid artery, future aortic arch, proximal pulmonary artery, and DA, respectively. The seventh intersegmental arteries contribute to the subclavian artery (black solid line in Figure 3A) (, , ).
Figure 3
In the present case, both primitive sixth arches had not degenerated. The partial degeneration of the left dorsal aorta occurs near the sixth and fourth arch arteries; that is, degeneration of the left aortic arch occurs between the LSA and LDA. Therefore, it causes the RDA and LDA to be directly connected to DAo (Figure 2C). The degeneration of different combinations of the primitive fourth and sixth arch arteries can lead to different types of aortic arch and DA.
Based on the findings of this case, we reviewed all literature works on BDA and summarized 40 cases of BDA in 25 articles over the last few decades. Some of the cases in the literature did not provide basic information and imaging findings of the anatomical features of specific cases; therefore, they were not included in the summary in Table 1 (). The characteristics of these cases are that at least one side of the DA is not directly connected to the DAo, and they are all reported during the fetal or infant periods. Figure 3 can be used to understand the combination forms of these anomalies.
Table 1
| Case | References | Diagnosis time | Aortic arch position | Type | LDA connection | RDA connection | Associated CHD | EA | Outcomes | Chromosomal test | Bilateral DA close | Figure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA (weeks) | Newborn age (days/weeks/months) | Left | Right | |||||||||||
| 1 | Wen et al. () | 28 weeks | RAA | Ia | LPA-LDA-ILSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | No | No | Born | NM | Yes | Yes | 3B | |
| 2 | Sun et al. () | 25 weeks | RAA | Ia | LPA-LDA-ILSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | No | No | Born | NM | Yes | Yes | 3B | |
| 3 | Patel et al. () | 25 weeks | RAA | Ia | LPA-LDA-ILSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | No | No | Born | (–) | NM | NM | 3B | |
| 4 | Freedom et al. () | Newborn | RAA | Ia | LPA-LDA-ILSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | NM | NM | Death | NM | NM | NM | 3B | |
| 5 | Abdul Latiff et al. () | 25 days | RAA-MIB | Ib1 | LPA-LDA-LSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | PA, VSD | No | Survival | NM | No | No | 3Ca | |
| 6 | Karmegaraj and Vaidyanathan () | 19 weeks | RAA-MIB | Ib2 | LINA-LDA-LPA | RPA-RDA-DAo | No | No | TOP | NM | NM | NM | 3D | |
| 7 | van Velzen et al. () | 22 weeks | RAA-MIB | Ib2 | LINA-LDA-LPA | RPA-RDA-DAo | No | No | Born | (–) | Yesb | Yesb | 3D | |
| 8 | Freedom et al. () | Newborn | RAA-MIB | Ib2 | LINA-LDA-LPA | RPA-RDA-DAo | No | No | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3D | |
| 9 | Kearney et al. () | 1 day | RAA-MIB | Ib2 | LINA-LDA-LPA | RPA-RDA-DAo | AVSD, PTA, CTA | HTX | Death | NM | Noc | Noc | 3Da | |
| 10 | Lenox et al. () | 1 day | RAA-MIB | Ib2 | LINA-LDA-LPA | RPA-RDA-DAo | d-TGA, SV, PA, MA | No | Survival | NM | No | No | 3Da | |
| 11 | Murray et al. () | 9 months | RAA-MIB | Ib2 | LINA-LDA-LPA | RPA-RDA-DAo | PTA, VSD | No | Death | NM | No | No | 3Da | |
| 12 | Park et al. () | 34 days | RAA-MIB | Ib2 | LINA-LDA-LPA | RPA-RDA-DAo | Dextrocardia, PA, AVSD | HTX | Survival | NM | No | No | 3Da | |
| 13 | 11 days | RAA-MIB | Ib2 | LINA-LDA-LPA | RPA-RDA-DAo | cc-TGA, PA | SI | Survival | NM | No | No | 3Da | ||
| 14 | Freedom et al. () | Newborn | RAA | Ic | LPA-LDA-ALSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | PA | NM | Death | NM | NM | NM | 3Ea | |
| 15 | Ma et al. () | 25 weeks | RAA | Ic | LPA-LDA-ALSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | No | No | Born | (–) | Yes | Yes | 3E | |
| 16 | Lenox et al. () | 6 days | RAA | Ic | LPA-LDA-ALSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | d-TGA/IVS | No | Survival | NM | No | No | 3E | |
| 17 | Lenox et al. () | 2 days | RAA | Ic | LPA-LDA-ALSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | d-TGA/IVS | No | Survival | NM | No | No | 3E | |
| 18 | Yuksel et al. () | 16 weeks | RAA | Ic | LPA-LDA-ALSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | AVSD | ACC,PUV | TOP | T18 | NM | NM | 3E | |
| 19 | Shirali GS et al. () | 1 day | DAA | III | LPA-LDA-LAA | RPA-RDA-RAA | d-TGA/IVS | No | Survival | NM | No | No | 3F | |
| 20 | Dipchand et al. () | Newborn | DAA | III | LPA-LDA-LAA | RPA-RDA-RAA | IAA(RAA), AVSD, | HTX | Survival | NM | No | No | 3Fd | |
| 21 | Blatchford et al. () | 3 days | DAA | III | LPA-LDA-LAA | RPA-RDA-RAA | IAA(DAA), VSD | No | Death | NM | No | No | 3Fe | |
| 22 | Keagy et al. () | 16 months | LAA | IIa | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-IRSA | No | No | Death | NM | No | No | 3G | |
| 23 | 7 days | LAA | IIa | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-IRSA | IAA, VSD | No | Survival | NM | NM | NM | 3G | ||
| 24 | Nath et al. () | Newborn | LAA | IIa | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-IRSA | DORV, VSD | No | Survival | NM | NM | NM | 3G | |
| 25 | 18 months | LAA | IIa | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-IRSA | No | No | Survival | NM | NM | NM | 3G | ||
| 26 | Newborn | LAA | IIa | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-IRSA | d-TGA, VSD | No | Survival | NM | NM | NM | 3G | ||
| 27 | Kumar et al. () | 4 months | LAA | IIa | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-IRSA | IAA (B type), VSD | No | Survival | NM | No | No | 3Gd | |
| 28 | Barger et al. () | 7 days | LAA | IIa | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-IRSA | IAA (B type), VSD | No | Death | NM | NM | NM | 3Gd | |
| 29 | Jew and Gross () | Newborn | LAA | IIb1 | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-RSA | No | No | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3H | |
| 30 | Freedom et al. () | Newborn | LAA | IIb1 | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-RSA | PA, SV, MA | No | Survival | NM | No | No | 3Ha | |
| 31 | Newborn | LAA | IIb1 | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-RSA | IAA (type C) | No | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3Hd | ||
| 32 | Han et al. () | 22 weeks | LAA | IIb2 | LPA-LDA-DAo | INA-RDA-RPA | No | No | TOP | (–) | NM | NM | 3I | |
| 33 | Lenox et al. () | 5 days | LAA | IIb2 | LPA-LDA-DAo | INA-RDA-RPA | SA, SV, PA | No | Death | NM | No | No | 3I | |
| 34 | 1 day | LAA | IIb2 | LPA-LDA-DAo | INA-RDA-RPA | VSD, PLSVC | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3I | ||
| 35 | Chen Let al. () | 25 weeks | LAA | IIb2 | LPA-LDA-DAo | INA-RDA-RPA | No | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3I | |
| 36 | Murray et al. () | 3 weeks | LAA | IIb2 | LPA-LDA-DAo | INA-RDA-RPA | PTA, VSD | No | Death | NM | No | Nof | 3I | |
| 37 | Abdul Latiff yet al. () | 15 days | LAA | IIb2 | LPA-LDA-DAo | INA-RDA-RPA | Dextrocardia, TA, VSD, PA | No | Survival | NM | No | No | 3Ia | |
| 38 | Freedom et al. () | Newborn | LAA | IIb2 | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-RSA | No | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3I | |
| 39 | Newborn | LAA | IIc | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-ARSA | PA, VSD | No | NM | NM | NM | NM | 3Ja | ||
| 40 | Wang et al. () | 23 weeks | NM | NM | LPA-LDA-LSA | RPA-RDA-DAo | SV,SA,DORV, IAA, DSVC | No | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | |
| Our case | ||||||||||||||
| 41 | Zhang et al. | 23 weeks | RAA-MIB | III | LPA-LDA-DAo | RPA-RDA-DAo | d-TGA, VSD, PLSVC | No | TOP | No conducted | No | No | 2C | |
Basic information and imaging findings of 41 cases.
GA, gestational age; DA, ductus arteriosus; CHD, congenital heart disease; EA, extracardiac abnormalities; RAA, right aortic arch; LPA, left pulmonary artery; ILSA, isolated left subclavian artery; RPA, right pulmonary artery; DAo, descending aorta; NM, not mentioned; RAA-MIB, right aortic arch mirror-image branching; PA, pulmonary atresia; VSD, ventricular septal defect; TGA, transposition of the great arteries; IVS, interventricular septum; d-, dextro-; c-, complete; cc-, corrected; ALSA, aberrant left subclavian artery; ACC, abnormal corpus callosum; PUV, posterior urethral valves; TOP, termination of pregnancy; T18, trisomy 18; LINA, left innominate artery; AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect; PTA, persistent truncus arteriosus; CTA, cor triatriatum; HTX, heterotaxy syndrome; SV, single ventricle; MA, mitral atresia; SI, situs inversus; DAA, double aortic arch; IAA, interruption of aortic arch; IRSA, isolated right subclavian artery; DORV, double outlet right ventricle; LAA, left aortic arch; RSA, right subclavian artery; ARSA, aberrant right subclavian artery; SA single atrium; PLSVC, persistent left superior vena cava; TA, tricuspid atresia; DSVC, double inferior vena cava.
Representing main pulmonary artery atresia, absence or PTA.
Prostaglandin E1 infusion was started to prevent DA closure. In 3H, both left and right pulmonary arteries are connected to the main pulmonary artery, while the RPA is connected to RSA via RDA.
Pathology confirmed that both left and right pulmonary arteries were arterial ductal tissue, and there was an absence of both pulmonary arteries.
Representing IAA.
Representing IAA on both side arches.
Pathological confirmation of arterial ductal tissue.
We have summarized the nine combinations of BDA and aortic arch, which mainly include the right aortic arch (RAA), double aortic arch (DAA), and left aortic arch (LAA), and classified the combinations into three types. Type I refers to the RDA of the RAA connected to the RPA and DAo, with the LDA being ectopic. Type II refers to the LDA of the LAA connected to the LPA and DAo, with the RDA being ectopic. Type III refers to the bilateral DA connected to the aortic arch or near the DAo, with the other end connected to the pulmonary artery. Under each type, subtypes were classified as follows: a is the aortic branch, which is not connected to the aortic circulatory system originating from the pulmonary circulatory system via the DA; b refers to the pulmonary artery branches originating from the aortic circulatory system via the DA; and c usually occurs when the pulmonary artery is connected to the aberrant subclavian artery via the DA.
We refer to Type Ia, named isolated left subclavian artery (ILSA), as LPA-LDA-ILSA (Figure 3B) (–). Type Ib1 is characterized when the RAA-MIB is combined with PA, and the LPA originates directly from the LSA via the LDA; we refer to it as LPA-LDA-LSA (Figure 3C) (). Type Ib2 occurs when RAA-MIB is present with or without PA, and the LPA originates from the LINA via the LDA; we refer to it as LPA-LDA-LINA (Figure 3D) (–). Type Ic occurs when the LDA is connected to the LPA and the aberrant LSA (ALSA); we refer to it as LPA-LDA-ALSA (Figure 3E) (, , –). In type I, the RDA mentioned above are all connected to the RPA and Dao; we refer to it as RPA-RDA-DAo.
We refer to Type IIa, named isolated right subclavian artery (IRSA), as RPA-RDA-IRSA (Figure 3G) (–). In Type IIb1, the RPA originates directly from the RSA via the RDA, with or without PA; we refer to it as RPA-RDA- RSA (Figure 3H) (, ). In Type IIb2, the RPA originates from the INA via the RDA, with or without PA; we refer to it as RPA-RDA-INA (Figure 3I) (, , , , –). In Type IIc, the RDA is connected to the RPA and aberrant RSA (ARSA), with or without PA; we refer to it as RPA-RDA-ARSA (Figure 3J) (). In Type II, the LDA mentioned above are all connected to the LPA and Dao; we refer to it as LPA-LDA-DAo.
In Type III, we summarized two situations. The first one is our case, which involves an RAA with a bilateral DA connected to the Dao; we refer to it as LPA-LDA-DAo and RPA-RDA-DAo. Another type is DAA, where the LDA is connected to the LPA and LAA and the RDA is connected to the RPA and RAA; we refer to it as LPA-LDA-LAA and RPA-RDA-RAA (Figure 3F). The combination of DAA and BDA is very rare (). In addition, two cases were found with this combination, one with interruption of the aortic arch (IAA) on the right side () and the other with a double side ().
Coincidentally, Ia and IIa, Ib and IIb, and Ic and IIc almost form a mirror effect (Figures 3B and G, C and H, D and I, and E and J), which helps us to better understand and remember these patterns. In most cases, ectopia is always on one side of the BDA, almost occurring on the opposite side of the aortic arch, which seems to have some potential association. If there is PA, the blood supply to the pulmonary artery branch by the aorta is via the DA. At this point, the DA is defined as an abnormal connection rather than an ectopic connection. In our case, it is rare for the BDA to directly connect to the DAo without an ectopic connection, as we emphasized earlier.
In Table 1, 41 cases of BDA were included (including the cases in our study). Only 11 cases were reported during the fetal period (26.8%, 11/41). The age range of the other reported cases is from 1 day to 18 months after birth. Among the 41 cases, 26 (63.4%, 26/41) had congenital heart disease (CHD), 13 (31.7%, 26/41) did not have CHD, and the presence of CHD was not mentioned in the others. Among the 26 cases of CHD, there were 9 cases of PA, 7 cases of IAA, 6 cases of TGA, 4 cases of AVSD, 3 cases of PTA, and 3 cases of SV. These cases of PA were all reported in the infant period. In addition, in cases where birth outcomes could be followed up, DA closure occurred in 4 cases of RAA without CHD; however, in the other 17 cases, the DA was not closed, and all cases were combined with CHD. Among them were seven cases of PA, indicating that the DA provides the blood supply to both lungs. Because many studies have only reported the cardiac manifestations, the summary of extracardiac anomalies is not comprehensive. Heterotaxy syndrome (HTX) has the highest incidence, with three cases reported, which is similar to previous studies findings (, ). HTX is a laterality defect. In recent years, many scholars believe that TGA and AVSD are also laterality defects. In addition, most HTX patients also have PA (). Our summary in Table 1 found that the highest incidence of CHD in BDA is PA, TGA, AVSD, etc. In addition, BDA always appears heterotopic on the opposite side of the aortic arch. The above clues indicate that TGA with BDA could further support the hypothesis of TGA as a form of latency defect.
In summary, it is necessary to pay attention to BDA. Our case demonstrates a novel combination of BDA and cardiovascular anomalies. In addition, we focused on the forms of BDA reported in the current literature. During prenatal echocardiography, special attention should be paid to the position of the aortic arch and vascular branches, and the presence of ectopic DA should be observed on the opposite side of the aortic arch. Furthermore, the cardiac structure should be observed when complex vascular rings appear. The use of STIC can effectively display the 3D structures; however, it is still necessary to combine 2D grayscale images and CDFI to demonstrate spatial relationships well.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) and minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
SZ: Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NW: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. PQ: Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. XS: Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. YM: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. XG: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
This work was supported by Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2011K12-05-11), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82201802), the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2021ZDLSF02-14, 2022ZDLSF02-11).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Yue Zhang for adjusting the STIC HD live flow image and Ying Liu for helping collect information about the patient.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1389759/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Video S1Color Doppler flow imaging of BDA with RAA-MIB. The BDA completely encircles the trachea formed an “O”-shaped vascular ring. Above it is the Ao, and LINA can be seen.
Supplementary Video S24D color Doppler with STIC HD live flow mode was showed in this case. It can be inferred that d-TGA and the RAA with LDA formed a “U”-shaped vascular ring. At this point, the RDA was located immediately below the RAA and can only be observed with flickering RDA in certain cardiac cycles.
Supplementary Video S3STIC HD live flow Silhouette mode was showed in this case. The posterior view shows that we used the STIC HD live flow Silhouette mode to find the RDA hidden beneath the RDA.
Supplementary Figure S1The cardiovascular abnormalities of this fetus in pattern diagram are presented. The abnormal vascular features and abnormal intracardiac structure of this case are shown.
Abbreviations
BDA, bilateral ductus arteriosus; d-TGA, dextro-transposition of the great arteries; 2D, two-dimensional; RAA, right aortic arch; VSD, ventricular septal defect; PLSVC, persistent left superior vena cava; 4D, four-dimensional; STIC, spatiotemporal image correlation; LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; MPA, main pulmonary artery; Ao, aorta; Arch, aortic arch; LINA, left innominate artery; LCCA, left common carotid artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery; LSA, left subclavian artery; RSA, right subclavian artery; LDA, left ductus arteriosus; RDA, right ductus arteriosus; DAo, descending aorta; IPV, inferior pulmonary vein; SPV, superior pulmonary vein; T, trachea; IVC, inferior vena cava; SVC, superior vena cava; CS, coronary sinus; RAA-MIB, right aortic arch mirror-image branching; DAA, double aortic arch; LAA, left aortic arch; RAA, right aortic arch; PA, pulmonary atresia; ILSA, isolated left subclavian artery; ALSA, aberrant left subclavian artery; IRSA, isolated right subclavian artery; ARSA, aberrant right subclavian artery; CHD, congenital heart disease; IAA, interruption of aortic arch; AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect; PTA, persistent truncus arteriosus; SV, single ventricle.
References
1.
HannemanKNewmanBChanF. Congenital variants and anomalies of the aortic arch. Radiographics. (2017) 37(1):32–51. 10.1148/rg.2017160033
2.
GlewDHartnellGG. The right aortic arch revisited. Clin Radiol. (1991) 43(5):305–7. 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)80534-3
3.
EdwardsJE. Anomalies of the derivatives of the aortic arch system. Med Clin North Am. (1948) 32:925–49. 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)35662-0
4.
KurataniSCKirbyML. Initial migration and distribution of the cardiac neural crest in the avian embryo: an Introduction to the concept of the circumpharyngeal crest. Am J Anat. (1991) 191(3):215–27. 10.1002/aja.1001910302
5.
SchleichJM. Images in cardiology. Development of the human heart: days 15–21. Heart. (2002) 87(5):487. 10.1136/heart.87.5.487
6.
WenYXiangGXiongCYangYZhangJ. Isolated left subclavian artery with right aortic arch and bilateral ductus arteriosus: a challenging fetal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2021) 57(3):500–1. 10.1002/uog.22039
7.
SunXZhangYWangY. Prenatal diagnosis of right aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery in association with bilateral ductus arteriosus by two-and four-dimensional echocardiography: a case of rare vascular ring and review of literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2022) 35(14):2678–83. 10.1080/14767058.2020.1795825
8.
PatelCRSmithGLLaneJRRobinsonHB. Prenatal echocardiographic diagnosis of a right aortic arch and bilateral arterial duct with isolation of the left subclavian artery from the left pulmonary artery. J Ultrasound Med. (2007) 26(8):1107–10. 10.7863/jum.2007.26.8.1107
9.
FreedomRMMoesCAPelechASmallhornJRabinovitchMOlleyPMet alBilateral ductus arteriosus (or remnant): an analysis of 27 patients. Am J Cardiol. (1984) 53(7):884–91. 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90518-6
10.
Abdul LatiffHGopalARHidayatZFHaranalMBorhanuddinBKAlwiMet alDuctus arteriosus morphology in duct-dependent pulmonary circulation: CT classification and pattern in different ventricular morphology. Cardiol Young. (2023) 33(11):2243–51. 10.1017/s1047951122004218
11.
KarmegarajBVaidyanathanB. Right aortic arch, bilateral ductus arteriosus, and anomalous origin of left pulmonary artery from innominate artery in a fetus with normal intracardiac anatomy. Echocardiography. (2020) 37(5):796–8. 10.1111/echo.14668
12.
van VelzenCAdriaanseBRammelooLBlomNHrudaJ. Impact of prenatal diagnosis of ductal origin of the left pulmonary artery. Prenat Diagn. (2013) 33(13):1299–301. 10.1002/pd.4236
13.
KearneyMS. Total absence of the pulmonary artery with bilateral patent ductus arteriosus. J Pathol. (1969) 97(4):729–31. 10.1002/path.1710970420
14.
LenoxCCNechesWHZuberbuhlerJRParkSCMathewsRASiewersRDet alManagement of bilateral ductus arteriosus in complex cyanotic heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (1977) 74(4):607–13. 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)40889-1
15.
MurrayCAKornsMEAmplatzKEdwardsJE. Bilateral origin of pulmonary artery from homolateral ductus arteriosus. Chest. (1970) 57(4):310–7. 10.1378/chest.57.4.310
16.
ParkISKimYHKoJK. Bilateral patent ductus arteriosus and nonconfluent pulmonary arteries in neonates as shown by radial artery angiography. Tex Heart Inst J. (1997) 24(4):384–5. .
17.
MaBWuLZhangW. Rare vascular ring of right aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery in association with bilateral ductus arteriosus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2020) 55(1):135–7. 10.1002/uog.20365
18.
LenoxCCNechesWHZuberbuhlerJRParkSCMathewsRAFrickerFJ. Bilateral ductus arteriosus in D-transposition of the great arteries with right aortic arch. Chest. (1978) 74(1):94–6. 10.1378/chest.74.1.94
19.
YukselMAOztuncFImamogluMTutenATemel YukselIMadazliR. Prenatal diagnosis of a bilateral arterial duct associated with trisomy 18. J Obstet Gynaecol. (2015) 35(7):750–1. 10.3109/01443615.2015.1005585
20.
ShiraliGSGevaTOttDABrickerJT. Double aortic arch and bilateral patent ducti arteriosi associated with transposition of the great arteries: missing clinical link in an embryologic theory. Am Heart J. (1994) 127(2):451–3. 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90143-0
21.
DipchandAIWilliamsWGHornbergerLK. Double aortic arch with interruption proximal to the right carotid artery, bilateral patent ductus arteriosi, and complex congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. (2002) 23(2):246–7. 10.1007/s00246-001-0059-2
22.
BlatchfordJW3rdFranciosiRASinghAEdwardsJE. Vascular ring in interruption of the aortic arch with bilateral patent ductus arteriosi. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (1987) 94(4):596–9. 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)36224-5
23.
KeagyKSSchallSAHerringtonRT. Selective cyanosis of the right arm. Isolation of right subclavian artery from aorta with bilateral ductus arteriosus and pulmonary hypertension. Pediatr Cardiol. (1982) 3(4):301–3. 10.1007/bf02427031
24.
NathPHCastaneda-ZunigaWZollikoferCDelanyDJFultonREAmplatzKet alIsolation of a subclavian artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1981) 137(4):683–8. 10.2214/ajr.137.4.683
25.
KumarPBhatiaMKumarKJainS. Isolated right subclavian artery with interrupted aortic arch, ventricular septal defect and bilateral patent ductus arteriosus: a rare congenital anomaly. BMJ Case Rep. (2021) 14(7):e239654. 10.1136/bcr-2020-239654
26.
BargerJDCreasmanRWEdwardsJE. Bilateral ductus arteriosus associated with interruption of the aortic arch. Am J Clin Pathol. (1954) 24(4):441–4. 10.1093/ajcp/24.4.441
27.
JewEWJrGrossP. Aortic origin of the right pulmonary artery and absence of the transverse aortic arch, associated with patency of the interventricular septum and the ductus arteriosus. AMA Arch Pathol. (1952) 53(2):191–4. .
28.
HanJYuSHaoXGaoSWengZHeY. Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral ductus arteriosi and an anomalous origin of the right pulmonary artery from the right-sided duct. J Ultrasound Med. (2018) 37(12):2961–2. 10.1002/jum.14655
29.
ChenLZhouLXiJGuoY. Prenatal diagnosis of the ductal origin of the distal right pulmonary artery with bilateral ductus arteriosus using STIC-HD live flow rendering mode. Echocardiography. (2021) 38(12):2115–8. 10.1111/echo.15233
30.
WangYZhangJZengHCaoHSiZFengWet alUtility of modified vascular corrosion casting technique in the diagnosis of fetal ductus arteriosus abnormalities. Sci Rep. (2020) 10(1):13158. 10.1038/s41598-020-69694-5
31.
FormigariRVairoUde ZorziASantoroGMarinoB. Prevalence of bilateral patent ductus arteriosus in patients with pulmonic valve atresia and asplenia syndrome. Am J Cardiol. (1992) 70(13):1219–20. 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90063-5
32.
VersacciPPugnaloniFDigilioMCPutottoCUnoltMCalcagniGet alSome isolated cardiac malformations can be related to laterality defects. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. (2018) 5(2):24. 10.3390/jcdd5020024
Summary
Keywords
echocardiography, fetus, bilateral ductus arteriosus, right aortic arch, mirror-image branching, dextro-transposition of the great arteries, spatiotemporal image correlation
Citation
Zhang S, Wang N, Qu P, Shu X, Mi Y and Gao X (2024) Prenatal echocardiography diagnosis of a novel combination of bilateral ductus arteriosus and cardiovascular anomalies: a case report and literature review. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 11:1389759. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1389759
Received
29 February 2024
Accepted
15 April 2024
Published
09 May 2024
Volume
11 - 2024
Edited by
Bruno Marino, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Reviewed by
Roberto Formigari, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital (IRCCS), Italy
Maruti Haranal, U N Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Zhang, Wang, Qu, Shu, Mi and Gao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yang Mi miyangmm@163.com Xinru Gao 13152170136@163.com
† These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.