ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiac Rhythmology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1517484
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography: A Pathway towards Improved Diagnosis and Patient Care.View all 7 articles
Statistics and Behavior of Clinically Significant Extra-Pulmonary Vein Atrial Fibrillation Sources: Machine-Learning-Enhanced Electrographic Flow Mapping in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Provisionally accepted- 1Cortex Inc., Menlo Park, United States
- 2Institute of Medical Technology, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany
- 3c. Department of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University Bochum, Bad Oyenhausen, Germany, Bad Oyenhausen, Germany
- 4University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- 5Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping is an FDA 510(k)-cleared method for visualizing atrial activation wavefronts in atrial fibrillation (AF). Its clinical efficacy was demonstrated in the FLOW-AF randomized controlled trial, and its fundamental principles have been previously described. However, the underlying machine learning strategy used to develop and refine the EGF algorithm has not yet been detailed. Here, we present how our EGF Model-trained on procedural outcomes from 199 fully anonymized retrospective patient datasets-identifies clinically significant sources of AF and how this machine learning-driven hyperparameter optimization underlies its clinical effectiveness. We also examine the statistical characteristics of the identified sources and their impact on cycle length variability, offering insights into potential pathophysiological mechanisms.Methods and Results: Unipolar electrograms were recorded from patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF using 64-electrode basket catheters. The EGF Model processes these recordings to reconstruct divergent wavefront propagation patterns and quantify their temporal prevalence. We included 399 retrospective patients in total: 199 for training and optimizing 24 model hyperparameters, and 200 for subsequent analyses of source prevalence and characteristics. Our machine learning approach established an activity threshold, above which divergent wavefront patterns-termed "significant sources"-predicted AF recurrence. This threshold was validated in 85 prospective patients from the published FLOW-AF trial. Significant sources persisting postprocedure were associated with significantly higher recurrence rates than those successfully ablated.Notably, the majority of significant sources were not continuously active; however, when these sources switched "ON," the spatial variability of AF cycle lengths in the respective atrium decreased by more than 50%, suggesting an entraining effect.Conclusions: By systematically optimizing the EGF Model's hyperparameters based on clinical outcomes, we reliably detect and target key AF sources that, when ablated, improve procedural success. These findings, supported by the FLOW-AF trial, underscore the usefulness of clinical outcome-based machine learning to improve the efficacy of algorithm based medical diagnostics.
Keywords: Persistent atrial fibrillation, Electrographic flow mapping, Basket catheter, Panoramic mapping, machine learning, clinical validation
Received: 26 Oct 2024; Accepted: 03 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ruppersberg, Castellano, Haeusser, Ahapov, Kong, Spitzer, Nölker, Rillig and Szili-Torok. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Peter Ruppersberg, Cortex Inc., Menlo Park, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.