Association between serum uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) and abdominal aortic calcification: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2013–2014

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, with abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) being an independent risk factor. The serum uric acid (sUA) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (UHR) integrates both pro-atherogenic (sUA-induced endothelial dysfunction) and anti-atherogenic factors (HDL-C-mediated cholesterol efflux), which may be associated with vascular calcification. However, epidemiological evidence on their relationship remains scarce.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 2,789 U.S. adults aged ≥40 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2014 with complete AAC and UHR data. Participants with invalid AAC imaging, missing sUA/HDL-C measurements, or incomplete calcium/phosphorus intake records were excluded. AAC severity was quantified using the Kauppila scoring system via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. UHR was calculated as [sUA [mg/dl] divided by HDL-C [mg/dl]] multiplied by 100. Weighted multivariable linear and logistic regression models assessed associations, while weighted restricted cubic splines explored nonlinear relationships. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of findings.

Results: The study included a total of 2,789 participants aged 40 or older. After multifactorial adjustment, the regression model indicated that a higher UHR was significantly associated with increased AAC scores (β = 1.055, 95%CI: 1.024–1.087), AAC (OR = 2.605, 95%CI:1.760–3.855), and severe AAC (OR = 2.227, 95%CI:1.649–3.008). The restricted cubic spline analysis revealed significant nonlinear relationships between UHR and both AAC scores and AAC, presenting an inverted “L” shape, with the risk rising sharply at UHR levels close to 17.8–18.0 and then plateauing. Subgroup analyses suggested potential interactions between gender and diabetes in the UHR-AAC association, while sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the findings.

Conclusion: In a U.S. middle-aged and elderly population, the UHR was found to be nonlinearly associated with the risk of AAC, and may interact with gender and diabetes. However, due to the cross-sectional design, no causal inferences can be drawn. Future longitudinal studies may be considered to validate these associations and explore whether interventions targeting UHR could potentially slow down the progression of vascular calcification.

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, with an estimated 18.6 million deaths in 2019, accounting for 32% of all global deaths (1). Dysregulation of mineral metabolism, such as calcium and phosphorus, and the deposition of mineralized plaques in the arterial wall, a process known as vascular calcification (2), can lead to the onset and progression of CVDs (3). Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events and is closely associated with calcification in other vascular beds and subclinical atherosclerosis (4–6). The Kauppila AAC score, calculated from lateral lumbar dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans, ranges from 0 to 24 and is used to assess the severity of AAC, with scores greater than 6 indicating severe abdominal aortic calcification (SAAC) (7, 8).

Serum uric acid (sUA), the end product of purine metabolism, is associated with a variety of diseases. Elevated levels of sUA may increase insulin resistance through mechanisms such as reduced nitric oxide production, endothelial dysfunction, and promotion of vascular smooth muscle proliferation, thereby contributing to the development of atherosclerosis (9, 10). Additionally, increased sUA may also lead to elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (11).

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is considered a protective factor against CVDs. HDL-C can modulate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, thereby reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Studies have also found that lower levels of HDL-C may be associated with an increased risk of AAC (12, 13).

Notably, sUA and HDL-C exhibit a dynamic antagonistic interaction during arterial calcification. On one hand, sUA promotes premature calcification by activating the NLRP3 inflammasome to induce vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation (14, 15), while on the other hand, HDL-C counteracts this process through reverse cholesterol transport (16). However, current studies predominantly focus on the isolated associations of sUA or HDL-C with AAC (9, 17). In summary, the serum uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (UHR) may better reflect the dynamic balance between oxidative stress and anti-inflammatory protection (18–21). To date, no studies have explored the relationship between this ratio and AAC. This study aims to validate the linear relationship between UHR and AAC/SAAC in middle-aged and older adults using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2014. These findings may enhance the comprehensive understanding of CVDs and provide novel insights for the prevention, management, and treatment of AAC and SAAC.

Methods

Study population

NHANES is a nationally representative survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. It employs a stratified, multistage probability sampling method to select participants from across the country, and all data are publicly accessible on the NHANES website (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/NHANES/index.htm). The National Center for Health Statistics Institutional Review Board approved all NHANES protocols, and all participants provided written informed consent. This study utilized data from a single survey cycle conducted between 2013 and 2014, during which 10,175 participants were surveyed. Since all participants undergoing AAC scoring were aged ≥40 years, we excluded those with invalid data for AAC (N = 7,035; including participants aged <40 years, individuals ineligible for DXA scans due to pregnancy, or those with poor image quality; detailed criteria available at https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Data/Nhanes/Public/2013/DataFiles/DXXAAC_H.htm), missing UHR data (N = 124), and participants missing calcium and phosphorus intake data (N = 227). Ultimately, 2,789 participants were included in this study. The specific selection process is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Participant selection flowchart. UHR, serum uric acid-to-HDL cholesterol ratio; AAC, abdominal aortic calcification.

AAC and SAAC assessment

AAC scores were quantified using the Kauppila scoring system based on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, with examinations performed by trained and certified radiographers at the NHANES Mobile Examination Centers (7, 22). The Kauppila scoring system divides the abdominal aortic wall into four consecutive segments, directly corresponding to the L1 to L4 vertebral regions. Each segment is scored based on the degree of calcium deposition (0–6 points), and the sum of the segment scores constitutes the final AAC score (0–24 points). A total score greater than 6 indicates significant calcification and is classified as SAAC (7, 8). Detailed quantification protocols, including Kauppila scoring quality assurance procedures, are available at https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Data/Nhanes/Public/2013/DataFiles/DXXAAC_H.htm.

UHR measurement

sUA and HDL-C were measured from fasting blood samples collected in the morning. The HDL-C measurement procedure is as follows: Magnesium sulfate/dextran solution is added to the samples to form a water-soluble complex with non-HDL cholesterol, which does not react with the measurement reagents in subsequent steps. Then, by adding polyethylene glycol esterase, HDL cholesterol ester is converted into HDL-C. In the reaction, hydrogen peroxide generated is combined with 4-aminophenazone and N, N-Diethyl-p-phenylenediamine sulfate (HSDA) to form a purple or blue dye. Finally, laboratory personnel determine the HDL level by photometry at 600 nm.

The measurement of sUA is as follows: The DXC800 automated chemistry analyzer uses the timed endpoint method to measure sUA concentration. sUA is oxidized by uricase to produce urocanic acid and hydrogen peroxide. In the reaction catalyzed by peroxidase, hydrogen peroxide reacts with 4-aminophenazone (4-AAP) and 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonate (DCHBS) to produce a colored product, which is then measured at 520 nm to determine the sUA level (23). Subsequently, UHR is calculated by dividing sUA (mg/dl) by HDL-C (mg/dl) and multiplying by 100.

Covariates definition

Categorical variables included: gender, race/ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes, smoking status, and drinking status.

Continuous variables included: age, family poverty income ratio (PIR), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, dietary phosphorus, calcium intake, glycated hemoglobin, white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and total bilirubin.

In the home interviews, trained interviewers used computer-assisted personal interviewing to collect demographic information. The following variables relied on self-reporting by participants: age, gender, family PIR, race/ethnicity, smoking status, drinking status, hypertension, diabetes, and dietary intake.

Data obtained from the mobile examination center and laboratory tests included BMI, waist circumference, glycated hemoglobin, white blood cell count, ALT, AST, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and total bilirubin.

Smoking status was defined based on the question “Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your life?” and categorized as yes or no. Drinking status was defined through hierarchical criteria: 1) “non-drinkers”: participants answering “No” to Question 1 (“Have you ever consumed at least 12 alcoholic drinks in any one year?”); 2) Current drinkers: those answering “Yes” to Question 2 (“Had at least 12 alcoholic drinks in the past year?”) were classified based on Question 3 (“frequency of alcohol consumption over the past 12 months”) and Question 4 (“number of drinking days per week, month, or year”), calculated into monthly intake and categorized as “1 to <5 drinks/month”, “5 to <10 drinks/month”, and “10+ drinks/month”. Hypertension was defined based on the question “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have hypertension?” and categorized as yes or no. Diabetes was determined based on laboratory tests indicating “glycated hemoglobin ≥6.5%” or “fasting blood glucose ≥126 mg/dl,” as well as questionnaires asking “Has a doctor ever told you that you have diabetes?” and “Are you currently using insulin?” and categorized as yes or no.

Calcium and phosphorus intake were determined based on both dietary and supplemental sources. Data for both were collected over a two-day period, yet not all participants completed data collection for both days. Since diet is a daily necessity while supplements are not, for participants with dietary calcium and phosphorus intake data for both days, the average intake over the two days was taken; for those with only one day of data, only that day's data was used. For supplemental calcium and phosphorus intake, the average over the two days was calculated. The final calcium and phosphorus intake was the sum of daily dietary intake and daily supplemental intake, defined as mg/day.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed according to the NHANES data analysis guidelines and recommended survey weights. Since there were few missing variables in the overall population, mean imputation was used for missing continuous covariates, and mode imputation was used for missing categorical variables. The missing patterns for each covariate can be seen in Supplementary Table S1. Baseline characteristics were described using unweighted means and weighted standard deviations for continuous variables, and unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages for categorical variables. Baseline characteristics were compared across UHR quartiles (Q1–Q4) using weighted one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and weighted chi-square tests for categorical variables, with the lowest quartile serving as the reference group (Q1).

Weighted multivariable linear regression models were used to explore the correlation between UHR and AAC scores. Weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the association between UHR and AAC and SAAC. Additionally, weighted restricted cubic splines (3 knots) were employed to explore potential nonlinear relationships between UHR and AAC. Variance inflation factors (VIF) were calculated to evaluate multicollinearity, confirming the independence of variables (VIF < 10) as detailed in Supplementary Table S2.

To further investigate the relationship between UHR and AAC and SAAC in different population subgroups, subgroup analyses were conducted by age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking status. The significance of interactions was estimated using the P values of interaction coefficients between UHR and subgroup populations. Furthermore, we excluded participants with a history of CVDs (including heart attack, congestive heart failure, angina, and coronary heart disease) from the survey to assess the reliability of our results.

All statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and DecisionLinnc version 1.0 (http://www.statsape.com). DecisionLinnc is an integrated software environment that supports multiple programming languages and offers a visual interface for data processing, data analysis, and machine learning (24). Statistical tests were two-tailed, and a P-value of less than 0.05 was assumed to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 2,789 participants were included in this study. The participants were categorized into four groups based on the quartiles of UHR: Q1 (1.346–7.454), Q2 (7.454–10.213), Q3 (10.213–13.478), and Q4 (13.478–39.583). As shown in Table 1, there were statistically significant differences across UHR groups in terms of AAC, SAAC, gender, tobacco use, alcohol use, diabetes, hypertension, family PIR, BMI (kg/m²), waist circumference (cm), calcium intake (mg), glycohemoglobin (%), white blood cell count (10⁹/L), alanine aminotransferase (U/L), blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L), aspartate aminotransferase (U/L), serum creatinine (umol/L), serum phosphorus (mmol/L), serum total calcium (mmol/L), total cholesterol (mmol/L), triglycerides (mmol/L), and total bilirubin (umol/L) (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed across the groups in terms of race/ethnicity, age, and phosphorus intake (mg) (P > 0.05).

Table 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics by UHR quartiles (weighted).

The relationship between UHR and AAC and SAAC

As shown in Table 2, the results of the weighted multivariable regression analysis indicated a statistically significant association between UHR and AAC scores, AAC and SAAC, after adjusting for all confounding factors. With AAC score as the outcome variable, the regression coefficient β and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for UHR score were 1.055 (1.024, 1.087). When AAC was the outcome variable, compared to the Q1 group, the odds ratios (OR) and 95%CI for Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 1.691 (1.139, 2.510), 1.772 (1.261, 2.490), and 2.605 (1.760, 3.855), respectively. When SAAC was the outcome variable, compared to the Q1 group, the ORs and 95%CI for Q2, Q3, and Q4 were 1.445 (0.920, 2.270), 1.714 (1.236, 2.377), and 2.227 (1.649, 3.008), respectively. After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, higher UHR quartiles (Q3 and Q4) showed persistently significant associations with increased risks of both AAC and SAAC, detailed in Supplementary Table S3. The main findings suggest that a higher UHR score may be associated with an increased risk of AAC and SAAC.

Table 2

Table 2. Multivariable regression of UHR and AAC/SAAC.

Restricted cubic spline analysis

The restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis, as depicted in Figure 2A, revealed a significant nonlinear relationship between the UHR score and the AAC score (P for Nonlinearity = 0.018). The change in the β coefficient approached zero after the UHR score reached approximately 18.004, indicating a saturation point. Figure 2B illustrates a similar significant nonlinear relationship between the UHR score and the presence of AAC (P for Nonlinearity = 0.002), with the odds ratio (OR) stabilizing at 17.867. However, the nonlinear relationship between the UHR score and SAAC, as shown in Figure 2C, was not significant (P for Nonlinearity = 0.063).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Nonlinear associations of UHR with AAC/SAAC (RCS). (A) UHR and AAC scores; (B) UHR and AAC; (C) UHR and SAAC. UHR, serum uric acid-to-HDL cholesterol ratio; AAC, abdominal aortic calcification; SAAC, severe AAC; β, regression coefficient; OR, odds ratio. X-axis, UHR score; Y-axis, Statistical estimates (β coefficients or ORs); Black dashed lines: Reference lines (β = 0 or OR = 1); Vertical histograms: Data distribution density; Brown solid lines: Restricted cubic spline fits; Blue shading: 95% confidence intervals; Red vertical lines: Inflection points.

Subgroup and sensitivity analyses

Subgroup analyses, as shown in Figure 3, indicated that the interaction effects between the UHR score and AAC were statistically significant in terms of gender and diabetes (P for interaction <0.05), while no significant interactions were observed for age, smoking status, and hypertension (P for interaction >0.05). The interaction effects between the UHR score and SAAC were significant for gender; however, no significant interactions were noted for age, smoking status, diabetes, and hypertension. Sensitivity analyses, presented in Table 3, demonstrated that the fully adjusted weighted multivariable regression model results remained robust after excluding participants with a history of CVDs (n = 287). Specifically, excluding these individuals did not alter the magnitude of associations between UHR and arterial calcification. For AAC as the outcome, the ORs for Q2–Q4 changed by −3.8%, −2.4%, and +2.4%, respectively, while for SAAC, the OR changes were +1.2%, +3.0%, and −4.8%. Confidence intervals overlapped substantially, and statistical significance (p < 0.05) was preserved for Q3 and Q4 in both models.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Subgroup analysis of UHR-AAC/SAAC associations (forest plot). AAC, abdominal aortic calcification; SAAC, severe AAC; Red squares, odds ratios (ORs); red solid lines, 95%confidence intervals; black dashed lines, reference (OR = 1).

Table 3

Table 3. Sensitivity analysis of UHR-AAC/SAAC (excluding CVDs history).

Discussion

Our study findings indicate a significant association between higher UHR scores and increased AAC scores, as revealed by the RCS analysis, which identified a significant nonlinear relationship characterized by an inverted L-shaped curve and a saturation point at a β coefficient of 18.004. Compared to the lower UHR group, the higher UHR group exhibited a markedly elevated risk of AAC, and similarly, a significantly heightened risk of SAAC. The RCS analysis showed a significant nonlinear relationship between UHR and AAC risk, with a saturation point for the OR value at 17.867. Although the nonlinear association between UHR and SAAC risk was not statistically significant, the inverted L-shaped curve suggests a potential threshold effect, where SAAC risk reaches a plateau at higher UHR levels (e.g., Q4). This pattern is consistent with findings from a Japanese cohort study (20). The borderline significance (P = 0.063) may reflect the smaller sample size of the SAAC subgroup (n = 253) or residual confounding by unmeasured factors. Future studies with larger samples and comprehensive metabolic profiling are warranted to validate this trend. Subgroup analyses suggest that the results may interact with gender and diabetes, and sensitivity analyses confirm that the UHR association with AAC and SAAC is consistent with the overall findings.

Recent studies in China first proposed the clinical value of UHR in diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), finding that AAA patients exhibited significantly higher UHR levels than controls. These findings suggest UHR may independently predict AAA in Chinese populations and serve as an auxiliary screening tool in clinical practice (25). Other research demonstrates UHR's significant positive correlation with insulin resistance (IR), indicating superior predictive accuracy for IR compared to isolated sUA or HDL-C measurements, positioning UHR as a potential IR biomarker in U.S. populations (26). Concurrently, Turkish studies identified UHR as a predictor of left main coronary artery stenosis (27), while acute coronary syndrome cohorts revealed UHR's superior predictive value over LDL-C for culprit plaques (19). Collectively, these findings highlight UHR's dual role in atherosclerotic plaque instability and medial calcification. Observed discrepancies may arise from tissue-specific responses to UHR-driven oxidative stress and inflammation. Japanese studies further identified a nonlinear association between UHR and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), with sex-specific interactions suggesting UHR correlates positively with arterial stiffness in females through a saturation effect, a pattern absent in males (20). This aligns with our subgroup findings, potentially attributable to sex hormone variations in female participants.

Studies demonstrate that elevated estrogen levels are associated with reduced cardiovascular disease risk (28). Postmenopausal women exhibit significantly elevated sUA levels (29), which has been established as an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in this population. HDL-C, a well-documented anti-atherosclerotic factor, shows positive correlations with female sex hormone levels (30, 31). Menopause induces complex hormonal and metabolic shifts, leading to substantially increased cardiovascular disease incidence, with earlier menopause onset correlating with poorer cardiovascular outcomes (32, 33). In diabetic patients, hyperglycemia-induced vascular endothelial damage and insulin resistance likely contribute to elevated AAC risk. Chronic hyperglycemia disrupts endothelial integrity and increases vascular permeability, creating a microenvironment conducive to calcium deposition (34, 35). Progression to diabetic nephropathy further exacerbates vascular calcification through renal dysfunction-mediated phosphorus-calcium metabolism dysregulation (36, 37). Chinese diabetic patients with elevated UHR show independent associations with cardiorenal complications (38), paralleling our findings of heightened AAC risk in diabetics. This suggests possible synergistic interactions between hyperglycemia and UHR pathways in exacerbating vascular calcification.

sUA promotes endothelial dysfunction via oxidative stress and inflammatory cascades, potentially mediating the UHR-AAC association observed in our study. Specifically, elevated sUA reduces nitric oxide bioavailability by enhancing superoxide generation and impairing endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity (39–41). This oxidative stress fosters a pro-calcific milieu within vascular walls. The nonlinear UHR-AAC relationship may indicate threshold mechanisms where sUA-induced NF-κB activation (42) overwhelms physiological defenses, accelerating monocyte-endothelial adhesion and vascular mineralization—critical processes in AAC progression.

HDL's protective role against AAC may become saturated at higher UHR levels, as suggested by our nonlinear, inverted L-shaped association. The functional impairment of HDL likely involves the following pathways: impaired reverse cholesterol transport (17, 43), enabling lipid accumulation in aortic walls; compromised anti-inflammatory capacity (44), permitting cytokine-mediated calcification; and defective antioxidant activity (45, 46), allowing uric acid-driven oxidative vascular damage. This triad of functional deficits explains why AAC risk plateaus despite rising UHR, providing a rationale for clinical risk stratification thresholds.

In summary, UHR demonstrates potential as a cardiovascular risk assessment indicator. However, its precise mechanistic role in AAC pathogenesis remains unclear. We expect that our findings may provide valuable insights for AAC risk management and prevention. Nevertheless, several limitations of this study warrant consideration. First, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference and only establishes exposure-outcome associations. Second, the exclusion of a substantial number of participants due to invalid AAC measurements may introduce selection bias. Third, self-reported variables are susceptible to recall bias, and residual confounding from unmeasured factors (e.g., inflammatory biomarkers, renal function, physical activity) cannot be excluded. Fourth, the absence of sex hormone measurements (e.g., estradiol, testosterone) and detailed menopausal staging limits our ability to explore gender-specific mechanisms in depth. Finally, the generalizability of our findings to non-U.S. populations requires further validation.

Conclusion

Based on an analysis of NHANES data, this study uncovers a significant correlation between the UHR and an elevated risk of AAC and SAAC within the middle-aged and elderly population in the United States. The results indicate a nonlinear relationship between UHR and the incidence of AAC, with the risk plateauing at a UHR threshold of around 17.9. Additionally, gender and diabetes status emerge as potential influencing factors that may modify this association. These findings position UHR as a promising biomarker for evaluating the risk of AAC. If this correlation is validated in prospective studies, the identified UHR threshold could prove invaluable in identifying high-risk individuals during routine clinical screenings. Future research should concentrate on longitudinally validating this threshold, exploring strategies to regulate UHR levels, and conducting risk assessments in specific subpopulations (e.g., gender, diabetes) and across ethnicities. Ultimately, these endeavors could contribute to the development of targeted prevention strategies aimed at reducing the cardiovascular disease burden associated with AAC.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

BL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. QH: Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Writing – review & editing. QY: Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MW: Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. YC: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the Special Project for Health Care Logistics of the Air Force Medical Center (24BJZ11).

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the NHANES platform and all participants in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1560022/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

CVDs, cardiovascular diseases; AAC, abdominal aortic calcification; SAAC, severe abdominal aortic calcification; sUA, serum uric acid; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; UHR, serum uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; PIR, poverty income ratio; BMI, body mass index; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; RCS, restricted cubic spline; OR, odds ratio; AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; IR, insulin resistance; NO, nitric oxide; HDL, high-density lipoprotein.

References

1. Roth G, Mensah G, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 76(25):2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Sage A, Tintut Y, Garfinkel A, Demer L. Systems biology of vascular calcification. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2009) 19(4):118–23. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2009.07.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Cox AJ, Hsu FC, Agarwal S, Freedman BI, Herrington DM, Carr JJ, et al. Prediction of mortality using a multi-bed vascular calcification score in the diabetes heart study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. (2014) 13:160. doi: 10.1186/s12933-014-0160-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Leow K, Szulc P, Schousboe JT, Kiel DP, Teixeira-Pinto A, Shaikh H, et al. Prognostic value of abdominal aortic calcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10(2):e017205. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017205

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bastos Gonçalves F, Voûte MT, Hoeks SE, Chonchol MB, Boersma EE, Stolker RJ, et al. Calcification of the abdominal aorta as an independent predictor of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis. Heart. (2012) 98(13):988–94. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301464

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. O’Connor SD, Graffy PM, Zea R, Pickhardt PJ. Does nonenhanced CT-based quantification of abdominal aortic calcification outperform the framingham risk score in predicting cardiovascular events in asymptomatic adults? Radiology. (2019) 290(1):108–15. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180562

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Kauppila LI, Polak JF, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, Kiel DP, Wilson PW. New indices to classify location, severity and progression of calcific lesions in the abdominal aorta: a 25-year follow-up study. Atherosclerosis. (1997) 132(2):245–50. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9150(97)00106-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Niu Y, Wang G, Feng X, Niu H, Shi W, Shen Y. Sex-specific association between monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and extensive abdominal aortic calcification in humans. Lipids. (2024) 59(2):29–40. doi: 10.1002/lipd.12385

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Liu T, Zuo R, Song J, Wang J, Zhu Z, Sun L, et al. Association of serum uric acid level with risk of abdominal aortic calcification: a large cross-sectional study. J Inflamm Res. (2023) 16:1825–36. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S404668

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Meshkani R, Zargari M, Larijani B. The relationship between uric acid and metabolic syndrome in normal glucose tolerance and normal fasting glucose subjects. Acta Diabetol. (2011) 48(1):79–88. doi: 10.1007/s00592-010-0231-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Oki Y, Kawai M, Minai K, Ogawa K, Inoue Y, Morimoto S, et al. High serum uric acid is highly associated with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction rather than increased plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Sci Rep. (2019) 9(1):682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37053-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kindi MA, Bélanger AM, Sayegh K, Senouci S, Aljenedil S, Sivakumaran L, et al. Aortic calcification progression in heterozygote familial hypercholesterolemia. Can J Cardiol. (2017) 33(5):658–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.02.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Forbang NI, McClelland RL, Remigio-Baker RA, Allison MA, Sandfort V, Michos ED, et al. Associations of cardiovascular disease risk factors with abdominal aortic calcium volume and density: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis. (2016) 255:54–8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.10.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Li H, Qian F, Liu H, Zhang Z. Elevated uric acid levels promote vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) proliferation via an nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3)-inflammasome-dependent mechanism. Med Sci Monit. (2019) 25:8457–64. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916667

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Liu Z, Chen T, Niu H, Ren W, Li X, Cui L, et al. The establishment and characteristics of rat model of atherosclerosis induced by hyperuricemia. Stem Cells Int. (2016) 2016:1365257. doi: 10.1155/2016/1365257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Rosenson RS, Brewer HB, Barter PJ, Björkegren JLM, Chapman MJ, Gaudet D, et al. HDL and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: genetic insights into complex biology. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2018) 15(1):9–19. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.115

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Rosenson RS, Brewer HB, Ansell BJ, Barter P, Chapman MJ, Heinecke JW, et al. Dysfunctional HDL and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2016) 13(1):48–60. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.124

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Li Z, Liu Q, Yao Z. The serum uric acid-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is a predictor for all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: a cross-sectional study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2024) 15:1417485. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1417485

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Deng F, Jia F, Sun Y, Zhang L, Han J, Li D, et al. Predictive value of the serum uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio for culprit plaques in patients with acute coronary syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2024) 24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03824-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wang H, Ba Y, Gao X, Zhuo J, Li Y, Sun J, et al. Association between serum uric acid to high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio and arterial stiffness in a Japanese population. Medicine (Baltimore). (2023) 102(31):e34182. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034182

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ding L, Guo H, Zhang C, Jiang B, Zhang S, Zhang J, et al. Serum uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is a predictor for all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in patients with diabetes: evidence from NHANES 2005–2018. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2024) 34(11):2480–8. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2024.07.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Schousboe JT, Wilson KE, Hangartner TN. Detection of aortic calcification during vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) compared to digital radiography. PLoS One. (2007) 2(8):e715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000715

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Huang X, Hu L, Tao S, Xue T, Hou C, Li J. Relationship between uric acid to high-density cholesterol ratio (UHR) and circulating α-klotho: evidence from NHANES 2007–2016. Lipids Health Dis. (2024) 23:244. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02234-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Chen HL, Wu C, Cao L, Wang R, Zhang TY, He Z. The association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. (2024) 24(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01637-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Xu J, Du X, Zhang S, Zang X, Xiao Z, Su R, et al. Diagnostic value of uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Med. (2024) 56(1):2357224. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2357224

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Zhou X, Xu J. Association between serum uric acid-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and insulin resistance in an American population: a population-based analysis. J Diabetes Investig. (2024) 15(6):762–71. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14170

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Demir ÖF, Arslan A, Kınık M, Şensoy B, Demir G. The uric acid/HDL-C ratio may predict significant coronary stenosis in moderate left main coronary artery lesions: an intravascular ultrasonography study. Lipids Health Dis. (2024) 23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02193-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zhao D, Guallar E, Ouyang P, Subramanya V, Vaidya D, Ndumele CE, et al. Endogenous sex hormones and incident cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 71(22):2555–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.083

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Jung JH, Song GG, Lee YH, Kim JH, Hyun MH, Choi SJ. Serum uric acid levels and hormone therapy type: a retrospective cohort study of postmenopausal women. Menopause. (2018) 25(1):77–81. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000953

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Herrington DM, Howard TD, Hawkins GA, Reboussin DM, Xu J, Zheng SL, et al. Estrogen-receptor polymorphisms and effects of estrogen replacement on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in women with coronary disease. N Engl J Med. (2002) 346(13):967–74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012952

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Punnonen R, Rauramo L. The effect of castration and estrogen therarapy on serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. (1980) 17(5):434–6. doi: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1980.tb00180.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Subramanya V, Zhao D, Ouyang P, Lima JA, Vaidya D, Ndumele CE, et al. Sex hormone levels and change in left ventricular structure among men and post-menopausal women: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Maturitas. (2018) 108:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.11.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Muka T, Oliver-Williams C, Kunutsor S, Laven JSE, Fauser BCJM, Chowdhury R, et al. Association of age at onset of menopause and time since onset of menopause with cardiovascular outcomes, intermediate vascular traits, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. (2016) 1(7):767–76. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2415

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Paneni F, Beckman JA, Creager MA, Cosentino F. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: part I. Eur Heart J. (2013) 34(31):2436–43. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Clyne AM. Endothelial response to glucose: dysfunction, metabolism, and transport. Biochem Soc Trans. (2021) 49(1):313–25. doi: 10.1042/BST20200611

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Huang H-Y, Lin TW, Hong Z-X, Lim L-M. Vitamin D and diabetic kidney disease. Int J Mol Sci. (2023) 24(4):3751. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043751

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Winiarska A, Filipska I, Knysak M, Stompór T. Dietary phosphorus as a marker of mineral metabolism and progression of diabetic kidney disease. Nutrients. (2021) 13(3):789. doi: 10.3390/nu13030789

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Xuan Y, Zhang W, Wang Y, Wang B, Xia F, Zhang K, et al. Association between uric acid to HDL cholesterol ratio and diabetic complications in men and postmenopausal women. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. (2023) 16:167–77. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S387726

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Papežíková I, Pekarová M, Kolářová H, Klinke A, Lau D, Baldus S, et al. Uric acid modulates vascular endothelial function through the down regulation of nitric oxide production. Free Radical Res. (2013) 47(2):82–8. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2012.747677

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Mandal AK, Mount DB. The molecular physiology of uric acid homeostasis. Annu Rev Physiol. (2015) 77:323–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170343

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Uric acid: the oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. (2008) 27(6):608–19. doi: 10.1080/15257770802138558

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Liang WY, Zhu XY, Zhang JW, Feng XR, Wang YC, Liu ML. Uric acid promotes chemokine and adhesion molecule production in vascular endothelium via nuclear factor-kappa B signaling. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2015) 25(2):187–94. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.08.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Maiolino G, Rossitto G, Caielli P, Bisogni V, Rossi GP, Calò LA. The role of oxidized low-density lipoproteins in atherosclerosis: the myths and the facts. Mediat Inflamm. (2013) 2013:714653. doi: 10.1155/2013/714653

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Vaisar T, Pennathur S, Green PS, Gharib SA, Hoofnagle AN, Cheung MC, et al. Shotgun proteomics implicates protease inhibition and complement activation in the antiinflammatory properties of HDL. J Clin Invest. (2007) 117(3):746–56. doi: 10.1172/JCI26206

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Murphy AJ, Woollard KJ, Hoang A, Mukhamedova N, Stirzaker RA, McCormick SPA, et al. High-density lipoprotein reduces the human monocyte inflammatory response. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2008) 28(11):2071–7. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.168690

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Yvan-Charvet L, Pagler T, Gautier EL, Avagyan S, Siry RL, Han S, et al. ATP-binding cassette transporters and HDL suppress hematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Science. (2010) 328(5986):1689–93. doi: 10.1126/science.1189731

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar