Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1573080

This article is part of the Research TopicTherapies Approaches in Venous Thromboembolism Management and CoagulationView all 10 articles

VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PROPHYLAXIS PRACTICES IN HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY PATIENTS ADMITTED TO NEUROLOGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS

Provisionally accepted
Nada  AlsuhebanyNada Alsuhebany1,2,3Lama  AlfehaidLama Alfehaid1,2,4*Danah  AlodhaibiDanah Alodhaibi1Madhawi  MahdaliMadhawi Mahdali1Sumaya  AlmoharebSumaya Almohareb1,2,3Abdulrahman  AlshayaAbdulrahman Alshaya1,2,3
  • 1Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 2King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 3King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 4King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) presents a significant challenge for neurocritically ill patients with cancer due to the combined risks of thrombosis and bleeding. This study aimed to describe VTE prophylaxis practices among this high-risk population.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary teaching hospital. Data were obtained for all patients admitted with neurocritical illness with a history of either solid tumors or hematological malignancies. The main outcome was the incidence of bleeding events in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU) using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria. Other secondary outcomes were the incidence of thrombotic events, NCCU length of stay, and in-hospital mortality.Results: Out of the 168 patients screened, 43 patients were included, of which 38 patients (88.3%) had solid tumors, and 5 patients (11.6%) had hematologic malignancies. The majority of patients (81.3%) received chemical VTE prophylaxis during hospitalization. The incidence of major bleeding events was reported in 8 patients (21%) with solid tumors and one patient (20%) with hematologic malignancies, with no cases of thrombosis during hospitalization. Compared to the literature, the incidence of major bleeding events in our study is lower than indicated by a previous report on high bleeding risks in similar patient populations. The median duration of hospital stay was five days in the NCCU and 17 days in the hospital, with a 30-day mortality rate of 14%.Our study highlights the complexity of managing VTE prophylaxis in neurocritically ill cancer patients, emphasizing the need for a careful risk-benefit assessment. The absence of thrombotic events suggests effectiveness; however, bleeding risks warrant caution. These findings underscore the importance of individualized care and highlight the need for further research to refine prophylaxis protocols, thereby ensuring both safety and efficacy in this high-risk group.

Keywords: Thrombosis, Venous Thromboembolism, Hematology, oncology, Neurological, anticoagulant activity

Received: 10 Feb 2025; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Alsuhebany, Alfehaid, Alodhaibi, Mahdali, Almohareb and Alshaya. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lama Alfehaid, Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.