Prognostic value of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in assessing cardiac involvement in autoimmune diseases: a prospective study

Background: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging in assessing myocardial macrophage infiltration in patients with autoimmune diseases and its relationship with clinical outcomes, specifically all-cause mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization.

Methods: A total of 36 patients with cardiac involvement due to autoimmune diseases were enrolled. All underwent ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging to assess left ventricular mononuclear macrophage infiltration. Clinical data, including myocardial biopsy results and left ventricular SUV values (LVmax and LVmean), were recorded. Prognostic thresholds were identified using ROC curve analysis, while Kaplan–Meier survival were used to analyze the relationship between myocardial macrophage activity and clinical outcomes.

Results: Of the 36 patients, 9 died and 9 were rehospitalized for cardiovascular reasons. ROC analysis demonstrated that LVmax ≥ 2.405 predicted all-cause mortality with an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92–1.00, P < 0.0001), while LVmean ≥ 1.36 predicted cardiovascular rehospitalization with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79–0.96, P < 0.0001). High ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake thus significantly correlated with adverse clinical outcomes, surpassing traditional markers such as ejection fraction and inflammatory biomarkers. Moreover, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging results were more consistent with the patients’ clinical conditions compared to myocardial biopsy, highlighting its superior diagnostic utility in assessing diffuse myocardial inflammation.

Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging offers a valuable, non-invasive, and quantitative method for assessing myocardial inflammation in autoimmune diseases. This technique shows potential for improving personalized treatment and prognosis by identifying patients at higher risk for adverse outcomes in autoimmune diseases.

Background

Autoimmune diseases can profoundly compromise cardiac health by triggering severe inflammatory responses (1). These responses can damage various components of the heart, including the pericardium, myocardium, conduction system, valves, coronary arteries, and microcirculation, often resulting in devastating outcomes (2–4). The diagnosis and treatment of cardiac involvement in autoimmune diseases typically require collaboration between cardiologists and immunologists. Cardiac damage is typically managed through interventions such as coronary procedures, pacemaker implantation, and heart failure management, while immunological treatment often includes steroids, immunosuppressants, and biologics, guided by inflammatory markers and clinical presentation. Despite these comprehensive approaches, many patients still face high rates of cardiac-related mortality, primarily due to the lack of quantitative, non-invasive methods to assess myocardial inflammation, which limits clinicians’ ability to tailor treatments and prevent adverse outcomes (5).

Although the molecular mechanisms of autoimmune diseases differ, their cardiac involvement shares common pathophysiological features, including chronic inflammation, cytokine dysregulation, and elevated cardiovascular risk (6, 7). A key mediator in these processes is macrophage infiltration, particularly pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, which are involved in the progression and prognosis of autoimmune diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis, myositis, and Sjögren's syndrome etc (8–12). Chronic activation of macrophages results in cardiac damage, fibrosis, and remodeling, ultimately impairing heart function (7, 13–15). Recent studies have shown that targeting macrophage functions may improve outcomes in immune-mediated diseases (16, 17). The similar pathophysiological changes in myocardial involvement across various autoimmune diseases provide a foundation for using non-invasive methods to assess macrophage-driven inflammation, thus improving diagnosis, guiding treatments, and preventing adverse outcomes.

It has been shown that activated macrophages overexpress somatostatin receptor subtype−2 (SSTR2) (18). Gallium-68-DOTA-0-Tyr3-Octreotate (⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE), a PET tracer that binds to SSTR2, was initially used to image neuroendocrine tumors clinically (19). Recently, this imaging agent has been validated as a marker of proinflammatory M1 macrophages in vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques (20, 21) and residual post-infarction myocardial inflammation (22). Additionally, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE does not show significant uptake in normal myocardial tissue, yet demonstrates increased accumulation correlated with various cardiac disease conditions (23). These findings suggest that ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging could serve as a non-invasive method for assessing macrophage infiltration and chronic inflammation in the heart, offering valuable insights into the progression of immune-mediated diseases and their impact on cardiac outcomes.

These findings support the potential of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging as a non-invasive method for evaluating macrophage infiltration and chronic myocardial inflammation, providing valuable insights into the progression of immune-mediated cardiac diseases. However, its clinical utility specifically in autoimmune-associated myocardial inflammation remains uncertain.

This study uses ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging to assess myocardial involvement in patients with various autoimmune diseases. It evaluates the prognostic impact of macrophage inflammation on cardiac outcomes, using all-cause mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization as key endpoints. The aim is to address the current gap in effective non-invasive methods for assessing myocardial inflammation, with the potential to establish diagnostic thresholds for more precise treatment of cardiac involvement in autoimmune diseases.

Methods

Study design and ethics approval

This single-center, prospective observational study was conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from March 1, 2019, to October 22, 2022. Patients diagnosed with cardiac involvement due to autoimmune diseases were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included a confirmed diagnosis of an immune-mediated disease with cardiac involvement, presenting with clinical symptoms (e.g., shortness of breath, chest pain, palpitations) along with elevated cardiac enzymes, abnormal ECG, or cardiac imaging indicating structural or functional abnormalities. These abnormalities were confirmed to be related to the systemic immune disease by both immunologists and cardiologists. Patients were required to have received standardized treatment, including steroid therapy, immunosuppressants, biologics, and any necessary cardiac interventions. The study enrollment flowchart is shown in Figure 1. Generally, patients with Behçet's disease are primarily treated with cyclophosphamide (CTX), leflunomide (LEF), or azathioprine (AZA). Patients with myositis typically receive a combination of cyclophosphamide (CTX) and methotrexate (MTX) or cyclophosphamide (CTX) with cyclosporine A (CSA). Those with vasculitis are mainly treated with cyclophosphamide (CTX), methotrexate (MTX), and tocilizumab (TCZ). Additionally, individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) usually undergo treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) combined with either leflunomide (LEF) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) paired with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Study enrollment flowchart illustrating patient inclusion, examinations performed, follow-up completion, and clinical outcomes.

Regular follow-up visits were mandatory for treatment adjustments. Exclusion criteria included cardiac neuroendocrine tumors and severe multi-system failure that precluded effective follow-up. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (IRB protocol #JS-2452), and all participants provided written informed consent.

Baseline characteristics and echocardiography

Clinical and demographic characteristics were collected at enrollment through chart reviews, laboratory data, and auxiliary examinations. Baseline data included sex, age, BMI, blood pressure, heart rate, laboratory parameters, and echocardiographic measurements. eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation (24). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed with commercially available equipment (Vivid E9, GE Medical Systems, Horten, Norway). Left ventricle systolic function was evaluated using Biplane Simpson's Ejection Fraction (Biplane LVEF). Right ventricle systolic function was assessed using Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE). Cardiac remodeling was primarily evaluated using LV mass index (LVMI) or relative wall thickness (RWT) (25).

⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

All patients underwent ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scans at enrollment. No dietary restrictions or fasting were required. Patients on long-acting somatostatin analogues discontinued these medications at least four weeks before examination (26). PET/CT imaging began approximately 45 minutes after intravenous injection of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE (3.3 ± 0.8 mCi). One bed position covering the thoracic region (heart centered) was acquired in 3D mode for 20 minutes using a time-of-flight PET/CT scanner (Polestar m660, SinoUnion Healthcare Inc., China). CT scanning parameters included a tube voltage of 120 kV, tube current-time product of 160 mAs, pitch of 1.3, slice thickness of 2.5 mm, and rotation time of 0.5 s. PET images were reconstructed using an ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm (2 iterations, 10 subsets, Gaussian filter of 4.5 mm in full width at half maximum, 256 × 256 matrix), with corrections for attenuation (CT-based), dead time, random events, and scatter.

Analysis of myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake was performed using MIM software. Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually delineated in three dimensions (3D), encompassing the entire left ventricular myocardium with approximately 10 mm thickness from base to apex on each PET/CT fused slice. LVmax was defined as the highest SUV among all voxels within the myocardial ROI, representing peak myocardial inflammation. LVmean was calculated as the average SUV of all voxels within the myocardial ROI. Given the potential dilution of focal areas of intense uptake by SUVmean, LVmax was selected as the primary prognostic metric for its robustness and minimal sensitivity to ROI delineation variability.

Myocardial biopsy and myocardial pathology

Among the enrolled patients, seven underwent myocardial biopsy, specifically targeting the mid-segment of the interventricular septum on the right ventricular surface. The procedure was performed under sterile conditions. After establishing venous access, typically through the jugular or femoral vein, a guiding sheath was advanced into the right ventricle under fluoroscopic guidance. Argon myocardial biopsy forceps (Argon Medical Devices, Plano, TX, USA) were introduced through the sheath and directed to the target area on the right ventricular surface of the interventricular septum. Three to five biopsy samples were routinely obtained to ensure sufficient tissue while minimizing trauma. The procedure was closely monitored for immediate complications, and the collected samples were sent for histopathological examination (27). Immunohistochemical staining using anti-CD68 antibody was performed on myocardial specimens to identify macrophages.

Follow-up and outcome measures

Patients received standard medication therapy and were regularly followed up at the cardiac outpatient clinic. Information on their current status, medication use, and any necessary re-examinations was collected through routine clinical visits or telephone calls. In July 2024, a final follow-up was conducted, with the primary endpoints being all-cause mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (Version 23; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of continuous data was assessed using one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests and histograms. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD for normally distributed data or median (IQR) for non-normally distributed data. Levene's test evaluated the homogeneity of variances. Normally distributed variables were compared using an unpaired t-test (for homoscedastic data) or Welch's correction (for non-homoscedastic data). Non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and compared using Pearson's χ² test or Fisher's exact test.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine area under the curve (AUC) for myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake (SUV LVmax and SUV LVmean) concerning two different outcomes (all-cause mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization). The optimal threshold values were identified based on the Youden index, with sensitivity and specificity explicitly reported. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was then performed using these identified threshold identified from the ROC curve, and differences between groups were assessed by the log-rank test. Given the exploratory nature and relatively small sample size of this study, we did not apply corrections for multiple comparisons. Thus, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the potential increase in Type I errors.

Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted as an exploratory analysis to assess whether myocardial LVmax and LVmean independently predicted adverse clinical outcomes after adjusting for relevant clinical covariates. Due to the limited sample size, logistic regression was chosen instead of Cox regression analysis. The detailed results of this analysis are presented in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table S1). These exploratory findings should be interpreted cautiously and validated in future larger-scale studies. A two-tailed P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics and outcomes

A total of 36 patients with cardiac involvement due to autoimmune diseases [17 men, 19 women; median age: 41 (29–64) years] were enrolled in the study. Patients were enrolled at a median interval of 2.8 months after their autoimmune disease diagnosis (range: 0.1–226 months; IQR: 0.3–33 months).The cohort included 11 patients with vasculitis [including 2 with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), 3 patients with Takayasu arteritis, 6 patients with systemic vasculitis], 8 with myositis, 4 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 4 with autoimmune myocarditis, 4 with Behçet's disease, 2 with systemic sclerosis, 2 with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, and 1 with Sjögren's syndrome. The follow-up period ranged from 0.5 to 65 months, with a mean follow-up time of 44 (20–58) months. Two patients were lost to follow-up; they discontinued participation and could not be reached, leaving their survival status unknown.

Baseline clinical data for the study population, grouped by patients who experienced adverse outcomes (death or cardiovascular-related rehospitalization) and those who did not, are summarized in Table 1. During the study, 9 patients died: 4 from cardiogenic shock, 3 from sudden cardiac death, 1 from respiratory failure due to alveolar hemorrhage, and 1 from cerebral infarction. The clinical data of these deceased patients are detailed in Table 2. The median survival time for patients who died was 9 [3.5–13.8] months. Additionally, 9 patients were readmitted for cardiovascular reasons, with a mean time to cardiovascular readmission was 37 ± 21 m, and 12 patients experienced composite endpoints (death or cardiovascular-related rehospitalization). Depending on the condition, the duration of immunosuppressant use is 46 [13, 65] months.

Table 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics in patients With and without death or cardiovascular rehospitalization.

Table 2

Table 2. Clinical data of the 9 deceased patients.

Analysis of the clinical characteristics of the deceased group revealed higher levels of high-sensitivity troponin, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and heart rate at enrollment, along with lower hemoglobin levels and glomerular filtration rates compared to the surviving group. Twenty-two patients (56%) had a Biplane EF below 50%. Despite these findings, no significant differences were observed in echocardiographic parameters such as left ventricular systolic function, size, or myocardial remodeling indices, including left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and relative wall thickness (RWT), between the two groups. The deceased group also had a higher use of inotropic drugs compared to survivors (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found in other medications, such as steroids, immunosuppressants, or biologics. Importantly, the left ventricular ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE SUV values (both mean and maximum) were significantly higher in the deceased group (both p < 0.05; Table 1).

In the cardiovascular rehospitalization group, patients had a higher BMI and a trend toward increased left atrial size compared to those without rehospitalization. This group also showed a higher rate of anticoagulant use, while other biochemical markers and cardiac function parameters did not significantly differ. Similarly, the ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE SUV values were notably elevated in the rehospitalization group compared to the non-rehospitalization group (both p < 0.05; Table 1).

Across all enrolled patients, peripheral blood high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels were significantly higher than the normal range. However, there were no significant differences in hsCRP levels between the mortality and survival groups, nor between those with and without cardiovascular rehospitalization(p > 0.05 for all comparisons).

Association between ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT uptake and myocardial macrophage inflammation

We validated the utility of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT myocardial imaging for detecting macrophage-related myocardial inflammation from three perspectives. First, we provided evidence showing a clear correlation between ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT myocardial imaging and the intensity of CD68-marked macrophages in myocardial biopsies (Figure 2). Second, we demonstrated the complementary diagnostic value of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT myocardial imaging to myocardial biopsy, especially in clinically challenging cases where biopsy yield negative or uncertain results (Table 2). Finally, we separately analyzed individual clinical cases of Takayasu arteritis, demonstrating good consistency between ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging and clinical disease actively levels (details provided in a dedicated subsection below).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Representative images of myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and CD68 immunohistochemical staining (A,B) SLE patient with mild myocardial inflammation: sparse myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake(lVmax = 1.62) and few CD68-positive macrophages. (C,D) Polymyositis patient with significant myocardial inflammation: marked myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake (LVmax = 2.27) and abundant CD68-positive macrophages. White arrows indicate myocardial biopsy sites. Scale bar = 100 μm.

In Figure 2, we illustrate representative cases from our cohort, specifically one patient with polymyositis and one with SLE. A notable increase in CD68-positive monocyte-macrophages was observed in the myocardium of polymyositis patient, whereas CD68-positive cells are sparse in the myocardium of the patients with SLE. Correspondingly, myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE LVmax values were higher in the polymyositis case (LVmax: 2.27) compared to the SLE case (LVmax: 1.62). This finding demonstrates the ability of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging to sensitively and specifically reflect monocyte-macrophages infiltration, supporting its reliability as a non-invasive method for assessing myocardial inflammation in autoimmune cardiac involvement.

Complementary value of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT myocardial imaging relative to myocardial biopsy

Among the enrolled patients, seven underwent myocardial biopsy. Two patients had pathological confirmation of active inflammation, including focal lymphocytic infiltration and notable CD68-positive macrophages infiltration. Their corresponding LVmax values were high at 2.76 and 2.27 respectively (Table 2: patients 4 and 2, Figure 2C). Clinically, these two patients eventually succumbed to cardiogenic shock.

Two other patients had myocardial biopsies showing no or minimal inflammatory cell infiltration (minimal CD68-positive macrophages), and their corresponding LVmax values were relatively low (LVmax at 1.7 and 1.62 Figure 2A). Both of these patients remained clinically stable throughout the follow-up period.

The remaining three patients showed no significant inflammatory response or only scattered CD3-positive lymphocytes in myocardial biopsies, yet presented notably elevated LVmax values (2.7, 2.45, and 2.40). Among them, the patient with the highest LVmax value (2.7; fifth deceased patient listed in Table 2) had negative biopsy results but demonstrated clear signs of myocardial inflammation on cardiac MRI, including T2-weighted hyperintensity in the anterolateral papillary muscle, mid-layer of the interventricular septum, and subendocardial myocardium of the left ventricular anterior and lateral walls. This patient ultimately died from cardiogenic shock. The other two patients remained stable and free of adverse clinical events during follow-up.

These findings suggest that when myocardial pathology confirms active inflammation, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging aligns well with biopsy results. More importantly, in clinical challenging scenarios where myocardial biopsy results may be negative or inconclusive-possible due to sampling error or the focal nature of inflammatory infiltration- ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE imaging demonstrates considerable complementary value by identifying patients with significant myocardial inflammation and elevated clinical risk.

Predictive value of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake

ROC curve analysis confirmed that elevated myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake (LVmax and LVmean) significantly predicted clinical outcomes (mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization) in patients with cardiac involvement of autoimmune diseases. Given the significant side effects associated with immunosuppressive and steroid treatments in autoimmune diseases, we intentionally selected thresholds that favored higher specificity, despite slightly lower sensitivity, to minimize overtreatment risk. Optimal thresholds determined from ROC analyses are provided in Figure 3 and Table 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3. ROC curves of myocardial lVmax and lVmean and in predicting (A) death and (B) cardiovascular rehospitalization. LVmax showed superior predictive performance compared to LVmean for both outcomes.

Table 3

Table 3. Prognostic value of myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake and clinical biomarkers.

To clearly illustrate the superiority of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake parameters (LVmax and LVmean) over conventional clinical markers, we provided a comprehensive comparison table (Table 3) that includes LVmax, LVmean, NT-proBNP, EF, and cardiac troponin I (cTnI). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis using ROC-derived thresholds revealed significant differences in patient outcomes (Figure 4). Regarding all-cause mortality, patients with LVmax ≥ 2.405 exhibited significantly shorter survival compared to shoes with LVmax < 2.405(log-rank χ² = 38.73, p < 0.0001). Similarly, LVmean ≥ 1.27 effectively differentiated patient survival, with significantly worse outcomes in the higher LVmean group (log-rank χ² = 39.79, p < 0.0001).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curves for (A) overall survival and (B) cardiovascular rehospitalization, stratified by optimal lVmax and lVmean thresholds. Higher LVmax (≥2.405) and LVmean (≥1.27 for survival; ≥1.36 for rehospitalization) significantly correlate with worse outcomes.

For cardiovascular rehospitalization, similar significant differences were observed. Patients with LVmax ≥ 2.405 had significantly earlier rehospitalization compared to those with LVmax < 2.405 (log-rank χ² = 37.40, p < 0.0001). Likewise, LVmean ≥ 1.36 was associated with significantly earlier cardiovascular rehospitalization events (log-rank χ² = 35.63, p < 0.0001). Median rehospitalization-free intervals were notably shorter for patients above these thresholds, whereas patients below these thresholds generally remained free from cardiovascular rehospitalization for the duration of follow-up.

Interestingly, NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) also showed significant predictive value for mortality based on Kaplan–Meier analysis (p = 0.007 and p = 0.012, respectively), but their ROC curves exhibited relatively lower specificity and AUC values, indicating inferior discriminatory power compared to LVmax and LVmean. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression analysis further supported the superiority of LVmax and LVmean as independent predictors for adverse outcomes (Supplementary Table S1). Other indicators, including biplane ejection fraction (Biplane EF) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), showed neither significant ROC curve results nor Kaplan–Meier analysis significance, confirming their limited prognostic utility in this study.

In summary, increased myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake, represented by LVmax and LVmean above identified thresholds, was significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes, clearly demonstrating its superior prognostic value for mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization.

Examples from Takayasu arteritis: ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE differentiates degrees of myocardial involvement in autoimmune disease

We further illustrate the clinical relevance of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in identifying varying degrees of myocardial involvement in Takayasu arteritis through the following representative cases (Figure 5). Patient A, a 36-year-old woman, had been living with Takayasu arteritis for over 10 years. Despite having moderate aortic regurgitation, her condition had remained stable, and she had successfully carried a pregnancy to full term. Her myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan showed minimal inflammation (LVmax = 0.71).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Representative myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT images illustrating varying inflammation severity in takayasu arteritis. From left to right: (A) 36-year-old woman, stable phase, minimal myocardial uptake (LVmax = 0.71); (B) 26-year-old woman, moderate myocardial inflammation post-aortic pseudoaneurysm repair (LVmax = 2.31); (C) 28-year-old woman, severe active myocardial inflammation requiring targeted therapy (LVmax = 3.31).

Patient B, a 26-year-old woman, was diagnosed with Takayasu arteritis three years prior and had undergone aortic valve replacement. She presented with back pain and decreased cardiac function (EF = 51%) due to a pseudoaneurysm involving the left main coronary artery, proximal to mid-LAD, and circumflex artery. Following successful pseudoaneurysm repair and anti-remodeling therapy, her condition stabilized, with myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan showing intermediate myocardial inflammation (LVmax = 2.31).

Patient C, a 28-year-old woman, was diagnosed with extensive Takayasu arteritis involving the aortic root (severe aortic regurgitation and aortic sinus dilation) and head and arm vessels (severe stenosis). She presented with heart failure and underwent a Bentall procedure with partial arch replacement. Due to persistent severe myocardial involvement, targeted anti-inflammatory therapy with tocilizumab was initiated, resulting in clinical improvement (EF increased from 46% to 63%). Her myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan confirmed severe myocardial inflammation (LVmax = 3.31).

These clinical examples underscore the sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in differentiating the extent of myocardial inflammation in Takayasu arteritis, demonstrating its clinical value in guiding personalized therapeutic approaches and prognosis assessment.

Discussion

This prospective single-center study confirms that confirms that myocardial macrophage inflammation assessed using ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization) in patients with autoimmune-related cardiac involvement. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT represents a feasible, safe, non-invasive, and quantitative approach for evaluating myocardial inflammation, with the potential to guide therapeutic decisions and improve prognosis in clinical practice.

This study revealed several clinically valuable findings.

Clinical relevance of chronic macrophage inflammation

Chronic macrophage inflammation is a key predictor of poor prognosis in autoimmune diseases, as it leads to significant myocardial damage and fibrosis. This inflammation is mediated by activated macrophages that release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, promoting fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction (28). Additionally, these macrophages generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress and further myocardial injury (29, 30). In autoimmune diseases, macrophages present cardiac antigens to T cells, triggering the production of autoantibodies that directly damage cardiomyocytes (10). This cascade of events leads to both diastolic and systolic dysfunction, arrhythmias, and fibrotic remodeling, all of which are key indicators of poor outcomes in heart failure. Although a strong link between macrophage infiltration and poor outcomes in autoimmune diseases has been established (31, 32), prospective studies specifically addressing cardiac involvement in autoimmune diseases are still limited. Our study adds valuable prospective evidence linking chronic macrophage inflammation with adverse cardiac prognosis in autoimmune diseases, highlighting the importance of further larger-scale studies to refine clinical strategies and treatment guidance.

Limitations of current methods and complementary value of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

Peripheral biomarkers such as cardiac troponin and high-sensitivity CRP often fail to adequately reflect myocardial inflammation severity. While echocardiography is essential for diagnosing myocardial involvement, cardiac function can be influenced by various factors. In addition to myocardial inflammation, factors such as stress, fluid overload, coronary artery disease, valvular involvement, and arrhythmias can significantly impact cardiac function. Moreover, cardiac function may significantly fluctuate with appropriate treatment, thus limiting its reliability as a stable indicator of inflammation severity. This variability likely explains why traditional echocardiographic parameters and remodeling indices (e.g., LVMI, RWT) did not show significant correlations with clinical prognosis in our study. Myocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing myocardial inflammation but has significant drawbacks including invasiveness, potential sampling errors due to the focal and heterogeneous nature of inflammatory lesions, and limited feasibility in chronic conditions (33). Typically, biopsies are performed from the interventricular septum of the right ventricle, an area that might not represent inflammation occurring predominantly in the left ventricle, potentially leading to false-negative or inconclusive results.

Cardiac MRI, despite its diagnostic value, is constrained by factors such as high costs, limited availability, renal function contraindications for contrast use, prolonged scan duration, and inability to directly quantify myocardial inflammation (34–36).

Currently, ¹⁸F-FDG PET remains widely used to assess myocardial inflammation (37), but interpretation challenges due to physiological myocardial glucose uptake often limit specificity (38).

In contrast, our findings highlight the complementary diagnostic utility of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging. This modality specifically targets somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SSTR2), which is expressed by activated M1 macrophages, offering higher specificity and fewer interpretative challenges compared to ¹⁸F-FDG PET. Crucially, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is particularly valuable when myocardial biopsy results are negative or uncertain, providing a non-invasive alternative that supports critical clinical decisions, especially regarding the initiation or intensification of immunosuppressive therapy. By identifying significant myocardial inflammation and minimizing overtreatment risks through judicious threshold selection, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT emerges as a robust and clinically relevant tool, complementing existing diagnostic approaches. Future studies directly comparing ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE with other imaging methods will further define its role and potential advantages in clinical practice.

SUV versus target-to-background ratio(TBR) in myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake reporting

The results of our study suggest that the left ventricular SUV value, whether maximum or mean, is more strongly correlated with prognosis than TBR. One reason for this could be that TATE primarily reflects the infiltration of M1-type mononuclear macrophages, which are unevenly distributed in the myocardium depending on the disease's etiology, three-dimensional distribution, and functional state (39). The maximum SUV value in the left ventricle is likely to represent the most severe stage of immune-mediated myocardial injury at the time of the scan, as patients—despite receiving standard treatment—still show elevated myocardial uptake, indicating that the current therapies may not be fully effective. In contrast, most patients in our study were in a stable phase of chronic macrophage-mediated inflammation, leading to relatively low SUV values. When SUV values are divided by blood pool values, the resulting TBR ratio becomes exaggerated, potentially reducing its sensitivity in accurately reflecting the disease severity. This may explain why TBR did not show a positive correlation with prognosis in our study. Furthermore, the relatively small sample size could also be a contributing factor.

Limitations and future directions

Our study has several important limitations. First, our analyses involved multiple statistical tests without formal adjustments for multiple comparisons, potentially inflating the Type I error risk. And the relatively small sample size prevented robust subgroup analyses and formal inclusion of multivariate regression results (provided in Supplementary Table S1). Although exploratory analyses indicate promising predictive value of myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake parameters (LVmax and LVmean), these findings should be cautiously interpreted and require validation in larger, multicenter studies. Additionally, the heterogeneity of autoimmune conditions included limits the generalizability of our results to specific disease entities; larger, more homogeneous patient cohorts are needed to refine disease-specific prognostic thresholds. Lastly, broader clinical implementation of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT remains constrained by higher costs, the necessity for specialized nuclear medicine infrastructure, and limited accessibility in certain regions, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Future studies should systematically address these challenges through prospective cost-effectiveness analyses, standardized imaging and reporting protocols, and evaluation of long-term clinical practicality across diverse healthcare settings.

Conclusion

Myocardial ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE uptake independently predicts adverse clinical outcomes in autoimmune-related cardiac involvement, highlighting its potential value as a non-invasive marker for myocardial inflammation. Larger multicenter studies and standardized protocols are warranted to confirm these findings and facilitate clinical implementation.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because at this stage, our patient cohort is still under active follow-up, and the data collection is ongoing. Therefore, we are currently unable to share the original data upon external request. Once the follow-up period concludes and analyses are finalized, we will consider reasonable requests for data sharing. Requests to access the datasets should be directed tobGlueHVlcHVtbmNoQHFxLmNvbQ==.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Peking Union Medical College Hospital (IRB protocol #JS-2452). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

XL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. NN: Data curation, Visualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Software. WC: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. WWW: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Validation, Formal analysis. XMS: Software, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. DCZ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. XHL: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. FLW: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. LGF: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Supervision. LH: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Supervision, Resources.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work is funded by the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (Grant/Award Number: 2022-PUMCH-B-098).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. ChatGPT was used for spelling correction.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issue please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1598638/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Pan S-Y, Tian H-M, Zhu Y, Gu W-J, Zou H, Wu X-Q, et al. Cardiac damage in autoimmune diseases: target organ involvement that cannot be ignored. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1056400. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1056400

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Conrad N, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G, Goetschalckx L, Callender T, Cambridge G, et al. Autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular risk: a population-based study on 19 autoimmune diseases and 12 cardiovascular diseases in 22 million individuals in the UK. Lancet. (2022) 400:733–43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01349-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gelfand JM, Wang S, Garshick MS. Autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular risk. Trends Mol Med. (2022) 28:1025–7. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.10.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Porsch F, Binder CJ. Autoimmune diseases and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2024) 21(11):780–807. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01045-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Caforio ALP, Adler Y, Agostini C, Allanore Y, Anastasakis A, Arad M, et al. Diagnosis and management of myocardial involvement in systemic immune-mediated diseases: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology working group on myocardial and pericardial disease. Eur Heart J. (2017) 38:2649–62. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx321

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Epelman S, Liu PP, Mann DL. Role of innate and adaptive immune mechanisms in cardiac injury and repair. Nat Rev Immunol. (2015) 15:117–29. doi: 10.1038/nri3800

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Prabhu SD, Frangogiannis NG. The biological basis for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction: from inflammation to fibrosis. Circ Res. (2016) 119:91–112. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303577

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Li Z, Liu H, Xie Q, Yin G. Macrophage involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. J Inflamm. (2024) 21:48. doi: 10.1186/s12950-024-00422-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ma C, Xia Y, Yang Q, Zhao Y. The contribution of macrophages to systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Immunol. (2019) 207:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.06.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Gouda W, Alsaqabi F, Moshrif A, Abbas AS, Abdel-Aziz TM, Islam MA. Macrophage activation syndrome triggered by systemic lupus erythematosus flare: successful treatment with a combination of dexamethasone sodium phosphate, intravenous immunoglobulin, and cyclosporine: a case report. J Med Case Rep. (2021) 15:497. doi: 10.1186/s13256-021-03072-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zong Y, Yang Y, Zhao J, Li L, Luo D, Hu J, et al. Characterisation of macrophage infiltration and polarisation based on integrated transcriptomic and histological analyses in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Front Immunol. (2023) 14. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1292146

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Lin W, Xie X, Luo Z, Chen X, Cao H, Fang X, et al. Early identification of macrophage activation syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus with machine learning. Arthritis Res Ther. (2024) 26:92. doi: 10.1186/s13075-024-03330-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Steffens S, Nahrendorf M, Madonna R. Immune cells in cardiac homeostasis and disease: emerging insights from novel technologies. Eur Heart J. (2021) 43:1533–41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab842

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bajpai G, Schneider C, Wong N, Bredemeyer A, Hulsmans M, Nahrendorf M, et al. The human heart contains distinct macrophage subsets with divergent origins and functions. Nat Med. (2018) 24:1234–45. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0059-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Yang S, Zhao M, Jia S. Macrophage: key player in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1080310. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1080310

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wang X, Li Y, Pu X, Liu G, Qin H, Wan W, et al. Macrophage-related therapeutic strategies: regulation of phenotypic switching and construction of drug delivery systems. Pharmacol Res. (2024) 199:107022. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.107022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Liu N, Zhang J, Yin M, Liu H, Zhang X, Li J, et al. Inhibition of xCT suppresses the efficacy of anti-PD-1/L1 melanoma treatment through exosomal PD-L1-induced macrophage M2 polarization. Mol Ther. (2021) 29:2321–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.03.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Armani C, Catalani E, Balbarini A, Bagnoli P, Cervia D. Expression, pharmacology, and functional role of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1 and 2 in human macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. (2007) 81:845–55. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0606417

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Tirosh A, Papadakis GZ, Millo C, Hammoud D, Sadowski SM, Herscovitch P, et al. Prognostic utility of total ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE-avid tumor volume in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Gastroenterology. (2018) 154:998–1008.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Mojtahedi A, Alavi A, Thamake S, Amerinia R, Ranganathan D, Tworowska I, et al. Assessment of vulnerable atherosclerotic and fibrotic plaques in coronary arteries using ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2015) 5:65–71.25625028

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Evans NR, Chowdhury MM, Figg NL, Shah AV, et al. Detection of atherosclerotic inflammation by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET compared to [18F]FDG PET imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 69:1774–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.060

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Tarkin JM, Calcagno C, Dweck MR, Evans NR, Chowdhury MM, Gopalan D, et al. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET identifies residual myocardial inflammation and bone marrow activation after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2019) 73:2489–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.052

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Itani M, Haq A, Amin M, Mhlanga J, Lenihan D, Iravani A, et al. Myocardial uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE: correlation with cardiac disease and risk factors. Acta Radiol. (2022) 63:1166–72. doi: 10.1177/02841851211054193

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, et al. CKD-EPI (Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. (2009) 150:604–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2015) 28:1–39.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Malan N, Vangu M-D-T. Normal variants, pitfalls and artifacts in ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT imaging. Front Nucl Med. (2022) 2:825486. doi: 10.3389/fnume.2022.825486

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Xu XQ, Tian Z, Fang Q, Jing ZC, Zhang SY. Standard operation procedure of percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy in peking union medical college hospital. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. (2021) 49:12–6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200723-00583

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Barton AK, Tzolos E, Bing R, Singh T, Weber W, Schwaiger M, et al. Emerging molecular imaging targets and tools for myocardial fibrosis detection. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2023) 24(3):261–75. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac242

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Lavine KJ, Pinto AR, Epelman S, Kopecky BJ, Clemente-Casares X, Godwin J, et al. The macrophage in cardiac homeostasis and disease: JACC macrophage in CVD series. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 72:2213–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Hilgendorf I, Frantz S, Frangogiannis NG. Repair of the infarcted heart: cellular effectors, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Circ Res. (2024) 134:1718–51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.323658

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Wang Q, Zhou X, Zhao Y, Xiao J, Lu Y, Shi Q, et al. Polyphyllin I ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis by suppressing the inflammation response in macrophages through the NF-κB pathway. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2091. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02091

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Peng Q-L, Zhang Y-L, Shu X-M, Yang H-B, Zhang L, Chen F, et al. Elevated serum levels of soluble CD163 in polymyositis and dermatomyositis: associated with macrophage infiltration in muscle tissue. J Rheumatol. (2015) 42:979–87. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141307

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Vidusa L, Kalejs O, Maca-Kaleja A, Strumfa I. Role of endomyocardial biopsy in diagnostics of myocarditis. Diagnostics (Basel). (2022) 12:2104. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092104

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Polte CL, Bobbio E, Bollano E, Bergh N, Polte C, Himmelman J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis. Diagnostics. (2022) 12:399. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020399

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Siddiqui TA, Chamarti KS, Tou LC, Demirjian GA, Noorani S, Zink S, et al. The merits, limitations, and future directions of cost-effectiveness analysis in cardiac MRI with a focus on coronary artery disease: a literature review. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. (2022) 9:357. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100357

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Mangion K, McDowell K, Mark PB, Rutherford E. Characterizing cardiac involvement in chronic kidney disease using CMR—a systematic review. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. (2018) 11:2. doi: 10.1007/s12410-018-9441-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Mushari NA, Soultanidis G, Duff L, Trivieri MG, Fayad ZA, Robson P, et al. An assessment of PET and CMR radiomic features for the detection of cardiac sarcoidosis. Front Nucl Med. (2024) 4. doi: 10.3389/fnume.2024.1324698

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Toner YC, Ghotbi AA, Naidu S, Sakurai K, van Leent MMT, Jordan S, et al. Systematically evaluating DOTATATE and FDG as PET immuno-imaging tracers of cardiovascular inflammation.. Sci Rep. (2022) 12(1):6185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09590-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Jin J, Wang Y, Liu Y, Chakrabarti S, Su Z. Cardiac resident macrophages: spatiotemporal distribution, development, physiological functions, and their translational potential on cardiac diseases. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. (2024) 14:1483–93. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2023.12.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar