ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Heart Failure and Transplantation
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1605130
This article is part of the Research TopicA Patient-Centered Approach to the Management of Heart Failure and ComorbiditiesView all 13 articles
Validation of PROMIS Anxiety Item Bank Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) Among Patients with Heart Failure
Provisionally accepted- 1Ajmera Transplant Centre & Division of Nephrology, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 2Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 3Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- 4Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 5Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- 6Department of Medical Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- 7Ajmera Transplant Centre & Divison of Nephrology, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Anxiety is highly prevalent among patients with heart failure (HF), negatively affecting health related quality of life (HRQOL). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety item bank computer adaptive testing (CAT) precisely assesses anxiety symptom severity. This study aims to assess construct validity and reliability of PROMIS-Anxiety CAT among patients hospitalized for HF. Methods: A cross-sectional convenience sample of adult patients hospitalized for HF, who completed PROMIS-A CAT, generalized anxiety disorder 7 (GAD-7), and other questionnaires electronically. Convergent validity was assessed by Spearman's rank correlation between PROMIS-A CAT, GAD-7, and other legacy measures. Known group analysis compared PROMIS-A CAT and GAD-7 scores between groups expected to have different levels of anxiety. Reliability of PROMIS-A CAT was calculated on the individual and group level from standard error of measurement, according to item response theory. Area under receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve and Youden's J statistic were used to identify a T-score cut-off for moderate/severe anxiety. Results: Of 333 participants, 87 (26%) had moderate/severe anxiety based on GAD-7 score (≥ 10). Participants completed on average (median [IQR]) 4(1) versus 7(0) items, with PROMIS-A CAT and GAD-7, respectively. PROMIS-A CAT T-scores were strongly correlated with GAD-7 scores (rho = 0.78) and moderately correlated with other legacy measures. Known-group analysis provided further support for construct validity of PROMIS-A CAT. Individual reliability for PROMIS-A CAT T-scores was >0.9 for 87% of the sample; mean reliability was 0.91. Based on ROC and Youden's J analyses, a T-score of 60 can be used to identify individuals with moderate/severe anxiety. Conclusion: These results support the validity and reliability of PROMIS-A CAT among patients hospitalized for HF.
Keywords: PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), PROMS (patient reported outcome measures), Anxiety, Heart failiure, Validation, Mental Health
Received: 02 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Marblestone*, Chu*, Tomei, Lodge, Bansal, Edwards, Ross, Stehlik, Thayaparan, Fadlallah, Lee and Mucsi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Nolan Marblestone*, nolan.marblestone@mail.utoronto.ca
Istvan Mucsi, istvan.mucsi@uhn.ca
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.