Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Cardiovascular Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1608210

Construction of a Right Ventricular Function Assessment Model in Patients Undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Based on VExUS Grading and the Classification and Regression Tree Algorithm

Provisionally accepted
Gao  JunGao JunPan  GaoPan GaoYuanyuan  DuYuanyuan DuZhang  JianjunZhang Jianjun*Jinrong  WangJinrong Wang*
  • Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Investigate the correlation between right ventricular function ultrasound indicators and the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) grading system in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and develop a right ventricular function assessment model using VExUS grading and the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm. Methods: This cross-sectional study collected data from patients in the Department of Critical Care at Harrison International Peace Hospital who underwent tracheal intubation within 24–48 hours from October 2023 to December 2024. Collected information comprised general clinical data, hematological indices, hemodynamic parameters, severity scores, right ventricular function ultrasound indicators, the maximum diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVCdmax), and Doppler spectra from the hepatic, portal and intrarenal veins. Patients were divided into two groups(VExUS 0 and VExUS ≥1)based on VExUS grading system to reflect the presence or absence of venous congestion. Baseline data were compared between groups, and Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between VExUS grading and right ventricular function ultrasound indicators. Subsequently, a right ventricular function assessment model was constructed using the CART algorithm. Results: A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with 26 in the VExUS 0 group and 54 in the VExUS ≥1 group. In the VExUS ≥1 group, the proportion of male patients, levels of NT-proBNP, cTnI, central venous pressure, cumulative fluid balance, and the usage rate of diuretics were significantly higher than in the VExUS 0 group (P < 0.05). IVCdmax was positively correlated with VExUS grading (r=0.773, P < 0.05), whereas tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and the tricuspid E-wave peak were negatively correlated (r= –0.670 and –0.648, respectively; P < 0.05). In the CART model analysis, the importance of the variables was ranked as: IVCdmax > TAPSE > tricuspid E-wave peak. When validated with a test set, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 87.5%. Conclusion: In patients undergoing IMV, IVCdmax, TAPSE, and the tricuspid E-wave peak show strong correlations with VExUS grading. A right ventricular function assessment model based on VExUS grading and the CART algorithm can effectively evaluate right ventricular performance and may serve as a useful tool in identifying venous congestion.

Keywords: Invasive mechanical ventilation, Right ventricular function, Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) grading system, Classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm, Model

Received: 08 Apr 2025; Accepted: 19 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jun, Gao, Du, Jianjun and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Zhang Jianjun, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, China
Jinrong Wang, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.