Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Heart Failure and Transplantation

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1612258

This article is part of the Research TopicPost-Transplant Monitoring for Allograft RejectionView all 4 articles

Core Signature of Rejection-Associated Cytokines and Chemokines in Endomyocardial Biopsies after Heart Transplantation

Provisionally accepted
Lena  ML RadomskyLena ML Radomsky1Jenny  F KuehneJenny F Kuehne1Kerstin  BeushausenKerstin Beushausen1Jana  KeilJana Keil1Ludmilla  KniginaLudmilla Knigina2Yves  ScheibnerYves Scheibner2Adelheid  GörlerAdelheid Görler2Arjang  RuhparwarArjang Ruhparwar2Fabio  IusFabio Ius2Christoph  L BaraChristoph L Bara2Christine  S FalkChristine S Falk1,3*
  • 1Institute of Transplant Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
  • 2Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
  • 3German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner-site Hannover-Braunschweig, Hannover, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Rejection remains a limiting factor for survival after heart transplantation (HTx) and predictive biomarkers are still missing. Therefore, our aim was to define the cytokine/chemokine microenvironment in endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) and plasma after HTx and to identify patterns, which reflect ischemia/reperfusion injury as well as allograft rejection. Therefore, we hypothesize distinct cytokine/chemokine patterns in heart biopsies with histopathologically proven rejection compared to the microenvironment in unsuspicious biopsies.Methods: EMB (n=181; n=52 patients) and peripheral blood samples (n=147; n=52 patients) were obtained between 6 days and 5 years after HTx. 50 immune proteins in EMB tissue lysates and plasma were quantified and concentrations were compared between EMB with and without histopathologically defined acute rejection (AR) and correlation analyses between tissue and plasma were performed.Results: Regarding rejection status, distinct cytokine/chemokine patterns were identified with significantly higher concentrations of CCL4, CXCL9 and CXCL10 in EMB with acute rejection (p<0.001). In addition, we identified individual long-term dynamics of patients after HTx associated with rejection. Elevated chemokine concentrations were detected also in EMB of patients with DSA. Moreover, significantly different patterns were observed between heart tissue and plasma without direct correlations.A core signature was defined for EMB with histopathologically proven AR, consisting of high concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL3 and CCL4. This EMB chemokine signature was clearly distinct from plasma samples arguing for a local protein microenvironment associated with AR. Further research is needed also with the help of AI to translate the different approaches for detection and prediction of AR into clinical practice.

Keywords: Heart Transplantation, rejection, Myocardial biopsies, Cytokines, Chemokines

Received: 15 Apr 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Radomsky, Kuehne, Beushausen, Keil, Knigina, Scheibner, Görler, Ruhparwar, Ius, Bara and Falk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Christine S Falk, German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner-site Hannover-Braunschweig, Hannover, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.