ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Clinical and Translational Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1620232
This article is part of the Research TopicBridging Translational Gaps in Cardiovascular Disease Through Large Animal ResearchView all articles
Quantitative evaluation of IVL: based on the tunica media gypsum calcification model and a prospective animal study
Provisionally accepted- 1Tianjin Key Laboratory of Precise Vascular Reconstruction and Organ Function Repair, Tianjin, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
- 3Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background:Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), an emerging adjunctive therapeutic modality, demonstrates potential in managing severely calcified lesions. However, its quantitative efficiency in disrupting calcifications with different characteristics, as well as the degree of damage to normal arteries, remains to be confirmed.Objectives:This study aimed to: i) quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of IVL in disrupting different types of calcifications, and ii) assess the impact of IVL on normal vascular structures.Methods: The gypsum models with different thicknesses and eccentricities were used to evaluate the effectiveness of IVL in disrupting calcifications with different characteristics. In vivo experiments involved iliofemoral arterial segments of nine Yorkshire experimental swine that were subjected to IVL and PTA working balloons, respectively. In vitro effectiveness of IVL was evaluated using the number of disrupted gypsum rings based on the gypsum models. In vivo effectiveness and safety of IVL were evaluated by digital subtraction angiography (DSA), light microscopy, and immunofluorescence staining based on the experimental swine at 0, 7, and 28 days.Results:The gypsum models revealed that the 1.04:1 oversized IVL working balloon could provide an optimal tightness between the balloon and the artery wall. The DSA imaging results showed that IVL significantly increased the immediate treated artery‘s diameter at +27.12±10.23% compared to the PTA working balloon at +13.72±7.66% in all experimental animals (n=9, p=0.0063). The imaging results revealed that IVL treatment significantly alleviated the lumen loss rate of treated arteries compared to the PTA working balloon at 7 (1.10±0.58 % vs 3.27±0.66 %) and 28 (4.90±1.60% vs 10.10±1.53%) days postoperatively (p<0.05). Histopathological analysis showed the IVL treatment did not increase the inflammatory status, synthesis of collagen, and other artery wall characteristics at 0, 7, and 28 days postoperatively. The immunofluorescence staining results revealed that IVL treatment did not significantly decrease the proportion of smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells in the treated artery. Conclusion: Our experiment revealed that the IVL device has good therapeutic effects on different characteristics of calcifications hiding in the tunica media and with good biological safety.
Keywords: intravascular lithotripsy, eccentric calcification, swine model, endovascular treatment, Gypsum model
Received: 29 Apr 2025; Accepted: 26 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Xu, Zhao, Guo, Song, Bi, Shen and Dai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yujun Shen, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease, Ministry of Education, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, Tianjin Municipality, China
Xiangchen Dai, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.