Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Cardiovascular Biologics and Regenerative Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1631222

This article is part of the Research TopicStem Cells in Cardiomyocyte Salvage: Bridging Regeneration and RepairView all articles

Transfer of Remote ischemic preconditioning Plasma from Heart Transplant Patients into isolated perfused Rat Hearts Prior Ischemia/Reperfusion Injurya translational study of cardioprotection

Provisionally accepted
Gizem  BingölGizem Bingöl1Steve  JesurasaSteve Jesurasa1Martin  StroethoffMartin Stroethoff1Julian  David JagdfeldJulian David Jagdfeld1Leila  HenningLeila Henning1Sebastian  RothSebastian Roth1,2Giovanna  Lurati BuseGiovanna Lurati Buse1,2René  M'PembeleRené M'Pembele1,2Annika  RaupachAnnika Raupach1,2*
  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 2CARID, Cardiovascular Research Institute Düsseldorf, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, Düsseldorf, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown in several experimental studies as an organ protective procedure against ischemic injury, but the implementation of RIPC into routine clinical practice has so far failed due to contradictory study results. However, in order to identify patient groups that could benefit from RIPC, numerous clinical trials have been initiated, but only one study with patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTX). In HTX patients, RIPC appears to be cardioprotective when used immediately before surgery, while it has not been investigated whether the cardioprotective effect of RIPC is longer lasting. Therefore, this study assessed if a RIPC procedure prior to HTX has a cardioprotective potential in a later time window. To avoid masking a potential cardioprotective effect of RIPC in HTX patients by reduced susceptibility to cardioprotective signals due to comorbidities and medications in these patients, this study investigates the protective potential of this plasma in healthy young rats. Thus, male HTX patients were treated with a sham or a RIPC procedure (3 cycles with 5 min inflating/deflating) via a blood pressure cuff at the left upper limb prior surgery. After HTX, blood was collected at arrival on intensive care unit, 24 and 48 h post-surgery. The isolated plasma was transferred to isolatedperfused rat hearts before induction of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cardiac function was determined by left ventricular pressure measurements and infarct size by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. In all measurements, no differences were observed between the sham-or RIPC plasma-treated groups at the respective time points. This suggests that RIPC plasma from HTX patients, at least in the experimental setup used, has no cardioprotective potential at later time points. This lack of effect could for instance be explained by either no or an insufficient amount of cardioprotective signals are produced or/and released into the blood following the RIPC procedure and needs to be explored in future studies.

Keywords: Langendorff, Cardioprotection, Plasma transfer, Infarct size, Heart Transplantation, cardiac surgery, Translational study

Received: 19 May 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bingöl, Jesurasa, Stroethoff, Jagdfeld, Henning, Roth, Lurati Buse, M'Pembele and Raupach. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Annika Raupach, Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, Düsseldorf, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.