Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Cardiovascular Surgery

Impact of postoperative delirium on long-term neurologic and neuropsychiatric outcome after cardiac surgery or percutaneous valve replacement–a prospective observational study

Provisionally accepted
Maike  SchmidtMaike Schmidt1Lukas  HinkenLukas Hinken1Johannes  TellerJohannes Teller1Maria  Magdalena GabrielMaria Magdalena Gabriel1Svea-Dorothee  SchimmelpfennigSvea-Dorothee Schimmelpfennig1Ralf  LichtinghagenRalf Lichtinghagen1Christine  FegbeutelChristine Fegbeutel1,2Andreas  SchäferAndreas Schäfer1Karin  WeissenbornKarin Weissenborn1Carolin  JungCarolin Jung1Hans  WorthmannHans Worthmann1*
  • 1Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
  • 2Universitatsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery or percutaneous valve replacement may experience long-term neurologic and neuropsychiatric complications. The impact of postoperative delirium (POD) on these long-term complications remains controversial. We intended to illustrate the neurological and neuropsychiatric outcome associated with the occurrence of POD in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery or percutaneous valve replacement. Methods: We included 179 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery or percutaneous valve replacement. Patients were evaluated postoperatively for delirium status. Neurological (score A) and neuropsychiatric (score B) outcomes were assessed using a structured examination protocol and interview at 1 year postoperatively and combined into a composite neurological and neuropsychiatric score (score A+B). Cognitive function was examined using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Depression, fatigue and quality of life were assessed using the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Clinical outcome was assessed using the Barthel-Index (BI) and Frailty Index (FI). All data were collected prospectively. Results: One year after cardiac surgery or percutaneous valve replacement, a high number of patients suffered from neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms with depressive symptoms (n=36, 20.1%) and symptoms of fatigue (n=72, 40.2%). Multivariable regression analysis showed that POD was associated with higher values on the A+B composite score, indicating worse neurological and neuropsychiatric outcome (POD status: b:1.172; 95%-CI, 0.070-2.273, p=0.037; age: b:0.134; 95%-CI, 0.086-0.182, p<0.001; NYHA classification at 1 year: b:1.998; 95%-CI,1.169-2.828, p<0.001; rehospitalization b:1.786; 95%-CI, 0.640-2.932, p=0.002). Patients with POD had lower postoperative MoCA scores (p=0.001) and lower scores on both the SF12 Physical (p=0.022) and the SF12 Mental Component Summary (p=0.048). POD was not associated with depressive symptoms (p=0.855), fatigue (p=0.122) or rehospitalization (p=0.379). Conclusions: POD in patients undergoing cardiac surgery or percutaneous valve replacement was independently associated with worse long-term neurological and neuropsychiatric outcome. POD may be a relevant prognostic marker indicating the need for specific follow-up services, whereas other clinical parameters were not predictive of outcome.

Keywords: postoperative delirium, cardiac surgery, Percutaneous valve replacement, neurologic and neuropsychiatric outcome, Cognitive Function, Depression

Received: 26 May 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Schmidt, Hinken, Teller, Gabriel, Schimmelpfennig, Lichtinghagen, Fegbeutel, Schäfer, Weissenborn, Jung and Worthmann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hans Worthmann, worthmann.hans@mh-hannover.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.