Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Hypertension

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1637388

A Clinical Prediction Model for Blood Pressure Changes After Renal Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension

Provisionally accepted
Ruiqing  HeRuiqing He1Chen  ChenChen Chen1Hong  ZhangHong Zhang1Yishuan  ZhangYishuan Zhang2Lingyan  LiLingyan Li1Rongxue  XiaoRongxue Xiao1Shuangyu  ChenShuangyu Chen1Shuyi  WuShuyi Wu1Zongjun  LiuZongjun Liu2Jun-Qing  GaoJun-Qing Gao1*
  • 1Putuo District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 2Shanghai Putuo Central School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To develop clinical prediction models to estimate blood pressure changes in hypertensive patients undergoing renal denervation (RDN).Methods: This single-center, prospective interventional study enrolled 70 hypertensive patients undergoing RDN between July 2022 and December 2023, with clinical data collected systematically before and after the procedure. Variable selection for modeling was performed through a rigorous process incorporating univariate analysis and clinical relevance assessment. Subsequently, two distinct clinical prediction models were developed and subjected to comparative evaluation. The primary outcomes were the absolute changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 6 months after RDN.: In both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Ridge regression models, seven variables (including index of microvascular resistance [IMR], preoperative SBP, age and creatinine) were significantly associated with SBP change, while four variables were significantly associated with DBP change. In the prediction model on SBP change, compared to the OLS model, the Ridge regression exhibited lower prediction errors (mean absolute error [MAE]: 6.40 vs. 6.95; mean squared error [MSE]: 65.58 vs. 76.15) and a higher R² (0.79 vs. 0.72). In the DBP model, the Ridge regression also achieved a lower MAE (3.62 vs. 3.73) and a higher R² (0.77 vs. 0.71). Conclusion: This study developed and compared predictive models for estimating blood pressure response at 6-month follow-up after RDN in patients with resistant hypertension. The Ridge regression model exhibited superior predictive accuracy and model stability. The model indicated that IMR was a factor associated with postoperative blood pressure reduction. (Word count: 249) 3/32

Keywords: renal denervation, Clinical prediction model, Resistant hypertension, index of microvascular resistance, blood pressure change

Received: 29 May 2025; Accepted: 27 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 He, Chen, Zhang, Zhang, Li, Xiao, Chen, Wu, Liu and Gao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jun-Qing Gao, Putuo District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.