Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. General Cardiovascular Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1638373

This article is part of the Research TopicImmune Cell Dynamics and Biomarkers in Cardiac Surgery-Induced Systemic Inflammatory ResponseView all 8 articles

Effect of Combined Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Transversus Thoracis Plane Block on Surgical Stress Response During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Provisionally accepted
Lian  HuangLian Huang*Ying  ChenYing ChenXiaohua  XuXiaohua XuFanpei  ZengFanpei ZengChuntian  LiChuntian LiHangxiang  FuHangxiang Fu*
  • Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To examine how patients having open heart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) react to surgical stress following bilateral transversus thoracis plane (TTP) block with ropivacaine improved by dexmedetomidine (DEX). Methods: Three groups of sixty patients (26M/34F, ASA II–III, 18–65 years old) slated for elective CPB heart surgery were randomly assigned: general anesthesia alone (Group C), TTP (ropivacaine) combined with general anesthesia group (Group R), or TTP (ropivacaine + DEX) with (Group RD). Primary outcomes measured serum cortisol levels at five perioperative phases, while the secondary outcomes included glucose/C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores postextubation, 48-hour sufentanil consumption, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demand frequency, rescue analgesia rates, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay, and complications. Results: At 24h postoperatively, RD and R groups exhibited statistical lower serum cortisol levels compared to controls (p<0.05), with parallel glucose reductions. However, the CRP level increased significantly. NRS scores in RD/R groups were significantly lower than controls at 0h, 6h, and 12h postextubation (p<0.05), and the RD group maintained superior analgesia versus both groups at 24h. RD and R groups demonstrated significant reductions for 48-hour sufentanil consumption versus controls, and RD group showed less total sufentanil consumption versus R group. Besides, both mechanical ventilation duration and ICU stay were shortened by serval hours compared to control. Significant reductions in the count of effective analgesic pump compressions were observed in groups R and RD compared to the control group. Moreover, rescue analgesia rates were 55%, and 15% lower in RD versus R and Control groups, respectively (p = 0.031). However, no intergroup differences occurred pulmonary complications. Conclusion: DEX-enhanced TTP blockade may contribute to attenuating the stress response, optimizing analgesia, and improving early postoperative recovery parameters in CPB cardiac surgery through opioid-sparing mechanisms and sympatholytic effects, demonstrating clinical viability within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Clinical trial registration Clinical Trials. Gov, identifier ChiCTR2400085899.

Keywords: Transversus thoracis muscle plane block, Open cardiac surgery, Dexmedetomidine, stress response, Postoperative pain

Received: 30 May 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Huang, Chen, Xu, Zeng, Li and Fu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Lian Huang, lian901928@163.com
Hangxiang Fu, fhx201002@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.