Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. General Cardiovascular Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1638929

This article is part of the Research TopicNew Advances in Cardiac ElectrophysiologyView all 4 articles

Preclinical and Clinical Evaluation of ECM Bioenvelopes for Preventing CIED Pocket Complications

Provisionally accepted
John  CatanzaroJohn Catanzaro1*Thomas  J ChristopherThomas J Christopher2,3Ziad  F IssaZiad F Issa4Rajasekhar  NekkantiRajasekhar Nekkanti1Huy  PhanHuy Phan5Afolabi  SangosanyaAfolabi Sangosanya6Hirad  YarmohammadiHirad Yarmohammadi7Benjamin  D'SouzaBenjamin D'Souza7
  • 1East Carolina Heart Institute at ECU Health Medical Center, Greenville, NC, United States
  • 2Atrium Health, Charlotte, United States
  • 3Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, United States
  • 4Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Prairie Cardiovascular, Sringfield, IL, United States
  • 5Valley Heart Rhythm Specialists, Chandler, AZ, United States
  • 6Bay Pines VA Medical Center, Bay Pines, FL, United States
  • 7Columbia University, New York, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) envelopes were developed to secure the device within the surgical pocket, mitigating serious risks for migration or erosion. Available CIED envelopes are either biologic, constructed from non-crosslinked extracellular matrix (ECM), or non-biologic, composed of absorbable synthetic mesh impregnated with antibiotics. Multiple studies have documented constructive remodeling following implantation of the ECM-based bioenvelopes, leading to healthy wound healing and a vascularized surgical pocket. Non-biologic materials, in contrast, trigger a foreign-body response, leading to fibrous encapsulation of the device. Indeed, clinical studies of the bioenvelope have demonstrated constructive remodeling and integration into host tissues. One observational clinical study evaluating CIED reoperations found that patients previously implanted with the bioenvelope had well-vascularized surgical pockets with siteappropriate tissues that facilitated easier device replacement, as opposed to fibrotic encapsulation of the device in patients managed with non-biologic envelopes or without envelopes. A novel, recently approved antibiotic-eluting bioenvelope is designed to provide both support for healthy wound healing plus reduced infection risk, which is a common adverse outcome of CIED implantation. This next-generation bioenvelope includes absorbable discs impregnated with the broad-spectrum antibiotics rifampin and minocycline. Preclinical studies report excellent biocompatibility, biphasic release of antibiotics over 2 weeks, and complete eradication of bacterial inoculates commonly associated with CIED infections. Therefore, this new antibiotic eluting bioenvelope adds standardized drug delivery to the device, without compromising the wound-healing benefits of noncrosslinked ECM. * P<.001 vs. biologic or non-biologic envelope groups.

Keywords: CIED, Pocket infection, Reoperation, Biologic Envelope, bioenvelope, Extracellular Matrix, Rifampin, minocycline. 2

Received: 31 May 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Catanzaro, Christopher, Issa, Nekkanti, Phan, Sangosanya, Yarmohammadi and D'Souza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: John Catanzaro, East Carolina Heart Institute at ECU Health Medical Center, Greenville, NC, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.