Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Cardiovascular Surgery

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1641784

This article is part of the Research TopicUnveiling Sex Differences in Cardiology: Integrative Research and Clinical ImplicationsView all articles

Gender related outcome differences in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Provisionally accepted
Riswan  AkramRiswan Akram1Friedrich  SobikFriedrich Sobik2Tim  KnochenhauerTim Knochenhauer2Sebastian  A PhilippSebastian A Philipp1Jens  BrickwedelJens Brickwedel2Xiaoqin  HuaXiaoqin Hua3Beate  ReiterBeate Reiter2Svante  ZipfelSvante Zipfel2Yvonne  SchneebergerYvonne Schneeberger4Evaldas  GirdauskasEvaldas Girdauskas5Hermann  ReichenspurnerHermann Reichenspurner2Bjoern  SillBjoern Sill2Andreas  SchaeferAndreas Schaefer2*
  • 1Elbe Kliniken Stade, Stade, Germany
  • 2University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • 3Universitatsklinikum Koln, Cologne, Germany
  • 4Asklepios Kliniken GmbH & Co KGaA, Hamburg, Germany
  • 5Universitatsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: Surgical myocardial revascularization shows impaired outcomes in women compared to men. Investigation of gender related outcome differences comprises of different operative strategies potentially hampering interpretation of data. We herein aimed to investigate gender related outcome differences in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) only.Methods: Between 2016 and 2021, 1075 consecutive patients underwent OPCAB at our center. Of those 880/1075 were male (81.9%) and 195/1075 were female (18.1%). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for investigating differences in survival probabilities. Identification of risk factors was conducted by logistic regression.Results: Male patients showed a higher rate of reduced LVEF < 35% (88/880, 10% vs. 9/195, 4.61%; p=0.025) and impaired renal function (creatinine: 1.17 ± 0.76 vs. 1.03 ± 0.59; p=0.016).In female patients less utilization of both internal mammary arteries was documented (502/880, 57.04% vs. 74/195, 37.94%; p<0.001). Procedure time (256.13 min vs. 238.02 min; p<0.001) and number of distal anastomoses (2.40 ± 0.83 vs. 2.11 ± 0.82; p<0.001) were lower in female patients. 30-day mortality (16/880, 0.34% vs. 4/195, 0.51%; p=0.77) and rates of disabling stroke (3/880, 1.81% vs. 1/195, 2.05%; p=0.55) were similar between groups. In logistic regression analysis age (OR 1.079; CI 1.001-1.162; p=0.047) and impaired renal function (OR 1.495; CI 1.090 -2.051; p=0.013) were identified as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality.Conclusions: Male and female patients present similar 30-day outcomes after OPCAB suggesting a potential benefit of OPCAB in female patients. However, female patients receive more saphenous vein grafts compared to men, which may lead to impaired long-term outcomes.

Keywords: coronary artery bypass grafting, Coronary Artery Disease, gender, STEMI, NSTEMI, OPCAB

Received: 05 Jun 2025; Accepted: 22 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Akram, Sobik, Knochenhauer, Philipp, Brickwedel, Hua, Reiter, Zipfel, Schneeberger, Girdauskas, Reichenspurner, Sill and Schaefer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Andreas Schaefer, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.