Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Cardiovascular Imaging

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1656101

This article is part of the Research TopicUltrasound in Cardiovascular Care: Preventive, Diagnostic, and Monitoring RolesView all 4 articles

Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Venous Cannulation Positioning during Venous-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Provisionally accepted
Yuanyuan  SunYuanyuan Sun1Chengmin  HuangChengmin Huang2Weimei  OuWeimei Ou2Zhixian  LiuZhixian Liu2Guang  FengGuang Feng2Xinchen  ZhangXinchen Zhang2Xu  ChenXu Chen1Bin  WangBin Wang2Guoming  ZhangGuoming Zhang2*
  • 1Department of ultrasound, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Fujian Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Xiamen, China, Xiamen, China
  • 2Emergency Department, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Fujian Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Xiamen, China, Xiamen, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact of ultrasound-guided venous cannulation positioning during the initiation of venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Methods: This retrospective study included 48 patients who received bedside VA-ECMO support between June 2019 and August 2024. Patients were divided into an ultrasound-guided group (UG, n=23) and conventional body surface landmark group (BSL, n=25). Clinical outcomes, cannula positioning accuracy, complications, infection markers, and prognosis were compared. A subgroup analysis was performed in patients who did not undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation (non-CPR). Results: Compared to BSL group, patients in the UG group had significantly higher rates of optimal venous cannula positioning (p < 0.01), lower incidence of unstable flow and pulmonary edema, and shorter aortic valve closure time, infection markers (WBC, PCT) were also significantly lower in the UG group (p < 0.05). In the non-CPR subgroup, the UG group had shorter ECMO duration, hospital stay, and dual antibiotic therapy duration (all p < 0.05), with non-significant trends toward better survival. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided venous cannulation improves cannula positioning accuracy, reduces early complications, and may enhance clinical outcomes, particularly in non-CPR patients. Routine use of ultrasound guidance is thus recommended in bedside VA-ECMO procedures.

Keywords: ECMO, Ultrasound guidance, Venous cannulation, Hemodynamics, Infection

Received: 29 Jun 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sun, Huang, Ou, Liu, Feng, Zhang, Chen, Wang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Guoming Zhang, guomingheart@xmu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.