CORRECTION article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 29 August 2025

Sec. Cardiovascular Genetics and Systems Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1662054

Correction: Comprehensive analysis of the transcriptome-wide m6A methylome of heart via MeRIP after birth: day 0 vs. day 7

  • 1. Department of Cardiology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China

  • 2. Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Article metrics

View details

1

Citations

902

Views

236

Downloads

There was an error in Figure 1C and Figure 8A as published. Due to our mistake in combining images, GAPDH band in Figures 1C, and images for NRCMs staining in Figure 8A were misused. The corrected Figure 1C and Figure 8A appear below.

Figure 1

Panel A shows immunofluorescence images of heart tissue with markers Ki67, EDU, pH3, and Aurora B at Day 0 and Day 7, indicating cellular positivity. Panel B is a bar graph displaying the percentage of positive cells for Ki67, EDU, pH3, and Aurora B, with significant differences noted at Day 7. Panel C shows a Western blot for PCNA and GAPDH from heart tissue at Day 0 and Day 7. Panel D is a bar graph with quantified PCNA levels, showing an increase at Day 7. Panels E and F present bar graphs of m6A in total RNA for heart and cardiomyocytes, respectively, with a reduction observed at Day 7.

The level of m6A in P7 rat heart was decreased compared to P0. (A,B) Representative immunofluorescence images of paraffin-embedded heart sections labeled with α-Actinin, Ki67, pH3, Aurora B, and EDU at 200 × magnification (α-Actinin, green; Ki67, pH3, Aurora B, and EDU, red; DAPI, blue. Scale bars, 200 µm). (C,D) Protein expression levels of PCNA as determined by Western blotting (C) in heart tissue from P0 and P7 rats and the corresponding densitometric analyses (D) GAPDH was detected as the loading control. (E,F) Quantification of m6A in total RNA in heart tissue (E) and NRCMs (F) from P0 and P7 rats. N 3 per group. The results are expressed as means ± SEMs (NS indicates not significant, *P 0.05, **P 0.01, ***P 0.001, compared to the control group).

Figure 8

Scientific image containing several panels. Panel A shows fluorescence microscopy images of four sets stained for METTL3, EDU, and Ki67 with variations in cell density. Panels B-E display bar graphs comparing expression levels in different groups. Panel F contains Western blot images showing protein expression with a corresponding bar graph. Panels G-O consist of line graphs illustrating mRNA levels of various genes over time with comparisons between si-METTL3 and si-NC. Statistical significance is indicated in the graphs.

The functional link of enhanced METTL3 expression to transcript stability of target genes. (A–D) Representative immunofluorescence images of NRCMs from P0 rat hearts labeled with METTL3, EDU, and Ki67 (METTL3, or α-actinin, red; EDU, or Ki67, green; DAPI, blue. Scale bars, 50 µm) (A) and their corresponding quantitative analysis (B–D). (E) mRNA expression level of METTL3 of NRCMs from P0 rat hearts transfected with AD-GFP, AD-METTL3, or si-METTL3 determined by the qPCR method. (F) Protein expression levels of Pfkfb2, Ank2, Cmya5, and Fbxo32 in P0 NRCMs transfected with si-NC or si-METTL3 (up) and the corresponding densitometric analysis (down). (G–J) mRNA expression level of Ank2 (G), Cmya5 (H), Fbxo32 (I), and Pfkfb2 (J) in P0 NRCMs transfected with si-NC or si-METTL3 after treated with 20 µg/ml Actinomycin D for 0, 3 or 6 h. (K) Protein expression levels of Dhcr24, Nacad, Slc16a3, and Slc7a5 in P0 NRCMs transfected with si-NC or si-METTL3 (up) and the corresponding densitometric analysis (down). (L–O) mRNA expression level of Dhcr24 (L), Nacad (M), Slc16a3 (N), and Slc7a5 (O) in P0 NRCMs transfected with si-NC or si-METTL3 after treated with 20 µg/ml Actinomycin D for 0, 3 or 6 h. GAPDH was detected as the loading control. *P 0.05, **P 0.01, ****P 0.001, *****P 0.0001, compared to the si-NC group.

File Supplementary Image 1 was erroneously published with the original version of this paper. The file has now been replaced.

The original article has been updated.

Statements

Generative AI statement

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

m6A, epitranscriptome, heart regeneration, METTL3, cardiomyocyte

Citation

Yang C, Zhao K, Zhang J, Wu X, Sun W, Kong X and Shi J (2025) Correction: Comprehensive analysis of the transcriptome-wide m6A methylome of heart via MeRIP after birth: day 0 vs. day 7. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 12:1662054. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1662054

Received

08 July 2025

Accepted

11 August 2025

Published

29 August 2025

Volume

12 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Neil Morgan, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

Updates

Copyright

* Correspondence: Xiangqing Kong Jing Shi

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics