Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Cardiovascular Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1662067

This article is part of the Research TopicFrom Laboratory Insights to Clinical Strategies in Cardiogenic ShockView all 3 articles

A Predictive Model for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock During Hospitalization

Provisionally accepted
fei  dongfei dongying  zhouying zhouyufei  zhaoyufei zhaoyunqiang  zhangyunqiang zhanghaiqing  lianghaiqing liangyu  songyu songRui  JingRui Jing*
  • TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To explore the current status and characteristics of upper gastrointestinal bleeding(UGIB) in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) following emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to develop and validate a predictive model based on baseline risk factors at the time of admission. Methods:We selected patients diagnosed with AMICS who underwent emergency PCI. Patients were categorized into the non-bleeding group and the bleeding group based on the occurrence of UGIB during hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was employed to construct a predictive model for UGIB based on baseline risk factors at admission. Results: A total of 253 patients were included in the study, of whom 58 experienced UGIB, resulting in an incidence rate of 22.9%. Univariate analysis indicated 7 variables that show statistical differences. The LASSO regression identified 5 non-zero coefficient variables, and the VIF test excluded the collinearity relationships among these 5 variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 3 risk factors for UGIB following AMICS emergency PCI: SCAI-CS stage D+E, eGFR < 45 ml/(min·1.73 m2), and LVEF < 36% (P < 0.05). The predictive model based on multivariate logistic regression results, demonstrated good fit according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ² = 6.968, P = 0.324). The model achieved an AUC of 0.768 [95% CI(0.700 ,0.837)] in predicting UGIB in patients undergoing emergency PCI for AMICS, with a sensitivity of 87.9%[95% CI (0.700, 0.837)] and a specificity of 52.3% [95% CI (27.8%, 61.2%)] . The DeLong test indicated that the AUC of the predictive model was superior to that of any individual indicator (P < 0.05), and the DCA curve confirmed the model's clinical utility.Recent Prognosis: The mortality rate during hospitalization in the bleeding group was significantly higher than that in the non-bleeding group (63.8% vs. 29.7%, P < 0.05). Additionally, the duration of hospital stays for surviving patients in the bleeding group was significantly longer than that in the non-bleeding group [19(14,37) vs. 12(9,16), (P < 0.001)]. Conclusion: High baseline SCAI-CS stage, poor kidney function, and low LVEF are independent risk factors for UGIB during hospitalization. The constructed predictive model demonstrates high predictive efficacy.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction, Cardiogenic shock, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, predictive model, prognosis

Received: 08 Jul 2025; Accepted: 17 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 dong, zhou, zhao, zhang, liang, song and Jing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rui Jing, nkjr1979@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.