ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiovascular Nursing
Patient‑Needs‑Enhanced Emergency Nursing Assessment Framework Accelerates Time‑Critical Care for Non‑Traumatic Chest Pain
Provisionally accepted
- 1Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- 2Marine Corps Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Chaozhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Non‑traumatic chest pain requires rapid Emergency Department (ED) triage, yet adherence to ECG ≤10 minutes and early troponin targets is inconsistent, standard nursing frameworks seldom prompt patient‑needs that affect timeliness and documentation. The aim of this study is to determine whether implementing a patient‑needs–enhanced Emergency Nursing Assessment Framework (ENAF), compared with usual care, increases the proportion of ED patients with non‑traumatic chest pain receiving a 12‑lead ECG within 10 minutes. Methods: This prospective single-center quasi-experimental before-after study was conducted in the T Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from January 2023 to January 2025 and assigned to a control group and ENAF group. The ENAF group comprised (1) eight hours of nurse training, (2) an ENAF electronic template incorporating mandatory pain, anxiety, information-need and social-support items, and (3) a triage "rapid chest-pain kit". The primary endpoint was completion of a 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes of triage; secondary endpoints were door-to-troponin time, ≥ 2-point pain reduction at 30 minutes, documentation completeness, ED length of stay (LOS) and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, HEART score, arrival mode and peak ED census. Results: Of 372 screened patients, 340 met eligibility and were analyzed (170 control, 170 ENAF). Timely ECG completion increased from 60.0% to 78.2% (adjusted odds ratio 2.31, 95% CI 1.47–3.63; P < 0.001). Median door-to-troponin time fell from 50 to 39 minutes (P < 0.001); pain-relief success rose from 45.3% to 61.8% (P = 0.002). Documentation completeness improved by ten percentage points (P < 0.001) and median ED LOS decreased by 0.8 hours (P = 0.01). Thirty-day MACE was similar between phases (15.3% vs 12.9%; P = 0.49), and no serious adverse events were attributed to the protocol. Conclusions: Augmenting ENAF with a structured clinical-needs module significantly accelerates ECG acquisition, improves other process metrics and enhances nursing documentation while maintaining patient safety. Adoption of this nurse-led approach could strengthen ED chest-pain pathways in comparable resource-constrained settings, and multicenter validation are warranted to establish generalizability.
Keywords: Chest Pain, Emergency Nursing, Quality Improvement, Patient-centred checklist, Electrocardiogram timing
Received: 10 Jul 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sun, Liu, Shen, Zhao and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Fangfang Zhao, 15221192870@163.com
Kaiyun Xu, kaiyunxush@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.