ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Sex and Gender in Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1666443
This article is part of the Research TopicUnveiling Sex Differences in Cardiology: Integrative Research and Clinical ImplicationsView all articles
Sex-Related Differences in Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Aortic Valve Replacement with the Edwards Intuity Valve System
Provisionally accepted- 1Universitatsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- 2Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
- 3Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Dortmund, Germany
- 4Universitat Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
- 5South Valley University Faculty of Medicine, Qena, Egypt
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is linked to a poor prognosis following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The exploration of sex differences in PPM outcomes is currently limited. This study seeks to assess the sex-specific effects of PPM following SAVR was rapid deployment AV (RDAVR) prosthesis the Edwards Intuity. Methods: From 2018 to 2023, a total of 256 patients (60 females and 196 males) who received isolated or combined RDAVR at our institution were included. The definition of PPM was established through the use of the indexed effective orifice area (EOAi) in accordance with the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria. A Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of any degree PPM. Results: Female had higher left ventricular ejection fraction preoperatively (p=0.018). The incidence of any PPM-degree for patients with BMI<30 Kg/cm2 was significantly higher in female than in male (33 (55%) vs. 26(13.3%), p<0.001). The same was noted for the incidence of PPM in patients with BMI≥30 Kg/cm2 (7 (11.7%) vs. 4 (2.0%), p=0.004). And the incidence of severe PPM (EOAi≤0.65 cm²/m²) for patients with BMI<30 Kg/cm2 was 16.7% in females vs. 0 in males (p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality did not differ between males and females. In the multivariate logistic regression, we could not identify independent predictors of PPM. Conclusions: In Patients receiving RDAVR, the incidence of PPM was significantly higher in female than in male. However, we did not find a correlation with early clinical outcomes. The incidence of severe PPM after RDAVR was low in both females and males. Due to differences in geometry and function of the LV in women, further studies are necessary to indicate whether the definition of PPM in men may adhere to elevated EOAi thresholds compared to women.
Keywords: Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Women, Echocardiography
Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jawoosh, Zayat, Dogan, Shieba, Moza, Tewarie, Lotfi, Khattab, Abugameh and Mohammed. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rashad Zayat, Universitatsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.