EDITORIAL article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Coronary Artery Disease
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1672089
This article is part of the Research TopicAnimal Models of Vascular InterventionsView all 6 articles
Editorial: Animal Models of Vascular Interventions
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
- 2Department of Physiology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
A study by Riber et al. evaluated carotid-jugular arteriovenous (AV) graft patency and function in a sheep model and compared a novel Biomodics © interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) drug-eluting graft to a traditional heparin-coated GORE® ACUSEAL graft. The authors aimed to determine if the Biomodics © IPN grafts were functionally superior to ACUSEAL grafts in a preclinical AV revascularization model. Bilateral end-to-end AV conduits from the common carotid artery to the jugular vein in female sheep were created, and animals were evaluated using ultrasonic duplex scanning for graft patency over 12 months. Interestingly, materials in the IPN grafts were not stable in vivo and degraded over time, leading to vascular occlusion and graft failure. In some IPN grafts, a fibrotic sheath encapsulated the degraded material, contributing to vessel occlusion. While the ACUSEAL grafts were biocompatible and maintained structural integrity, they eventually failed due to exaggerated neointimal hyperplasia. In this study, while nearly every IPN and ACUSEAL graft occluded within the 12-month evaluation period, the authors felt that the IPN grafts warranted continued study as they lacked overt neointimal growth and could benefit from construction using more biocompatible materials. In these experiments, sheep represented a suitable model due to vessel size and hemodynamics comparable to those in humans, yet cost, ethical concerns, and regulatory constraints may limit their broad utility.A common element of endovascular intervention in both experimental and clinical models is percutaneous access to the vasculature. Retrieval of the hemostatic sheath at the end of a procedure in an anti-coagulated subject causes bleeding that can be clinically significant and necessitate urgent surgical repair. Traditionally, this bleeding is controlled by 4-6 hours of external mechanical pressure, which is cumbersome for patients and precludes early ambulation. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are an alternative strategy for controlling postprocedural hemostasis. VCDs have gained clinical recognition over the past 20 years and are currently used in ~60% of all femoral access procedures. In this Research Topic, Perkins and Tu reviewed the utility of diverse animal models for preclinical evaluation of VCDs. In addition to providing an updated classification of VCDs, the authors discussed the anatomical characteristics of common large animal models (porcine, ovine, caprine, and canine) as they relate to VCD implantation techniques. Special attention was paid to study design, which included the correct choice of controls and ensured reproducible data across multiple endpoints and duration times while minimizing the number of experimental animals. The authors also discussed methods of performance evaluation of VCDs such as time to hemostasis, lack of prolonged vasospasms, acute thrombosis, embolization, and both local and systemic reactions. Overall, this comprehensive review article presents a valuable guide for testing implantable VCDs for hemostasis control.In addition to in vivo models, ex vivo preparations can offer several advantages such as precise control of experimental conditions and ease of access for intervention and/or observation. A study by van Beusekom and colleagues detailed use of ex vivo vascular bioreactors (VABIOs) under simulated flow and pressure conditions to assess efficacy of coronary artery stent implants. Using swine hearts surplused from slaughterhouse operations, these investigators validated VABIO as a viable alternative to in vivo and in vitro models for study of the vascular responses to biomechanical and biochemical factors associated with stent deployment. Swine coronary arteries closely mimic human arteries and are considered the gold standard for assessment of vascular stents; however, high cost and ethical concerns limit their broad use. This study helps validate the use of slaughterhouse swine hearts in VABIO as an established approach for thorough evaluation of vascular stents.Lastly, a study by Belhoul-Fakir et al. described a novel porcine model of atherosclerotic plaque initiation and early evolution. Autologous blood microinjections into the tunica media of the infrarenal aorta combined with a 12-week high-fat diet resulted in localized lipid accumulation at the injection sites. The adjacent arterial segments remained spared from lipid accumulation. The lipid deposits co-localized with markers of vasa vasorum, neutrophils, macrophages, and Tand B-leukocytes, recapitulating the complex pathology of nascent atherosclerotic plaques. The authors leveraged their histological data to challenge the prevailing concept that atherosclerotic plaque is initiated in a dysfunctional intimal layer, arguing that injured media can also serve as a nidus for plaque development. While the role of intraplaque hemorrhage in the non-linear growth of atherosclerotic plaque is well-recognized, the iatrogenic modeling of vessel wall hemorrhage has not been previously used in atherosclerosis research.In conclusion, the diverse experimental models detailed in this Research Topic provide critical insights into the biological responses to vascular intervention in the preclinical setting. Through judicious use of these and other animal models, the gap between basic science inquiry and clinical utility may be bridged.
Keywords: bioreactor, Grafts, preconditioning, restenosis, vascular, zinc-aspirin, Revascularization, animal model
Received: 23 Jul 2025; Accepted: 26 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Fishbein and Tulis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ilia Fishbein, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
David A. Tulis, Department of Physiology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, 27834, NC, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.