Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

Sec. Intensive Care Cardiovascular Medicine

This article is part of the Research TopicEvolving Horizons in Cardiac Intensive Care: Pharmacological, Technological, and Ethical DimensionsView all articles

Predictive models of immune microenvironment-related markers in patients with sepsis accompanied by myocardial dysfunction and their roles in diagnosis

Provisionally accepted
Xiao  ZhuXiao Zhu1Qing  LuQing Lu1*Xin  LiuXin Liu2Xianxiang  ZengXianxiang Zeng3*
  • 1Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
  • 2Department of Intensive Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China
  • 3Department of Sleep Disorders, Hunan Second Provincial People's Hospital (Hunan Brain Hospital), Changsha, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To evaluate immune microenvironment markers for predicting sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) and establish three predictive models— nomogram, decision tree, and gradient boosting machine (GBM)— to compare their efficacy in assessing SIMD risk. Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 165 patients with sepsis who were admitted between January 2022 and February 2025. Patients were divided into SIMD and non-SIMD groups according to the occurrence of SIMD. Risk factors influencing the occurrence of SIMD in patients with sepsis were screened using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Nomogram, decision tree, and GBM models were constructed based on the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the discrimination of each model. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 scores of the three models were calculated. Result: Among the 165 patients with sepsis included in the study, 75 were in the SIMD group, accounting for 45.45% (75/165). Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in APACHE II score, white blood cell count, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1), and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) levels (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a high APACHE II score (OR = 1.480, 95% CI: 1.127–1.945), high NT-proBNP level (OR = 1.013, 95% CI: 1.005–1.021), high sTREM-1 level (OR = 1.116, 95% CI: 1.034–1.205), and high HMGB1 level (OR = 1.006, 95% CI: 1.002–1.011) were risk factors for SIMD in patients with sepsis (P < 0.05). All three prediction models demonstrated excellent performance in the training set: nomogram (AUC = 0.843), decision tree (AUC = 0.815), and GBM (AUC = 0.885). No significant differences were observed in the AUC values among the models (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: The immune markers, sTREM-1 and HMGB1, were associated with SIMD. Elevated APACHE II score and NT-proBNP, sTREM-1, and HMGB1 levels are risk factors for SIMD in patients with sepsis. Predictive models based on these factors demonstrate strong performance and effectively identify high-risk individuals, aiding in early clinical intervention.

Keywords: Sepsis, Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction, triggering Receptor Expressed onMyeloid cells-1, High mobility group box 1, predictive model

Received: 15 Sep 2025; Accepted: 25 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Lu, Liu and Zeng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qing Lu
Xianxiang Zeng

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.