ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 12 December 2025

Sec. Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1710254

The heart of the futsal athletes: a comparison of heart structure among under-18, under-20 and adult elite players

  • 1. Sport Club Corinthians Paulista—Health and Performance Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • 2. Center of Excellence in Exercise Physiology and Training—NEFET, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • 3. Sfera Futebol Clube—Health and Performance Center, Jarinu, SP, Brazil

  • 4. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • 5. Department of Physical Education, São Judas University Rua Taquari, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • 6. Study Group on Myology Applied to Exercise, Vila Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

  • 7. University of São Paulo (USP) Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine (FMRP) Av. Bandeirantes, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

Article metrics

View details

750

Views

52

Downloads

Abstract

Introduction:

This study examined cardiac adaptations in futsal athletes to determine how sport-specific training influences cardiac morphology and function across different competitive levels.

Methods:

Male athletes from under-18, under-20, and adult categories underwent electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiogram, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Measured parameters included VO₂max, ventricular and atrial dimensions, wall thickness, and cardiac mass index. Group differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test (p < 0.05).

Results:

Under-20 athletes showed significantly higher VO₂max compared to adults (mean difference: +4.87 mL·kg−1·min−1; p = 0.014). Adult players exhibited greater interventricular septal (+0.68 mm; p = 0.048) and inferolateral left ventricular wall thickness (+0.75 mm; p = 0.016), alongside higher left atrial volume (+27.4 mL vs. U18; p < 0.001) and indexed left atrial volume (+14.6 mL/m² vs. U18; p < 0.001). Conversely, the right ventricular end-diastolic diameter was larger in under-18 athletes compared to under-20 (+10.9 mm; p < 0.001) and adult players (+14.3 mm; p < 0.001). Ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and ventricular mass index remained consistent among groups, confirming preserved systolic function across all athletes.

Conclusion:

Progressive futsal training promotes selective cardiac remodeling characterized by increased wall thickness and chamber dilation in adult athletes without compromising function. These adaptations reflect physiological remodeling associated with chronic high-intensity intermittent training, emphasizing the need for longitudinal monitoring to distinguish normal adaptation from early pathological changes.

1 Introduction

Among the various chronic adaptations promoted by high-level training, morphofunctional changes in the cardiac muscle stand out, a phenomenon often referred to as the athlete's heart (AH) (1, 2). It is well established that regular exercise training is associated with structural and functional modifications of the heart, including increased ventricular wall thickness, enlargement of the left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular cavities, atrial dilation, and functional changes such as reduced resting ejection fraction when compared to non-athletes (3, 4). Among the various chronic adaptations promoted by high-level training, morphofunctional changes in the cardiac muscle stand out, a phenomenon often referred to as the athlete's heart (AH) (1, 2). It is well established that regular exercise training is associated with structural and functional modifications of the heart, including increased ventricular wall thickness, enlargement of the left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular cavities, atrial dilation, and functional changes such as reduced resting ejection fraction when compared to non-athletes (3, 4). These cardiovascular adaptations are closely linked to improved aerobic fitness and cardiorespiratory efficiency, which can be objectively assessed through the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET), an established method for evaluating maximal oxygen uptake and the integrative response of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems to exercise (5). Such adaptations represent a physiological response to repeated hemodynamic overload and could be reversible in the absence of training stimulus (6).

Exercise-induced adaptations are heterogeneous and may vary significantly according to sex, age, ethnicity, training status, and type of exercise performed (710). The process of cardiac remodeling involves changes in size, geometry, mass, and chamber function, allowing the heart to adapt to the magnitude of the hemodynamic stimulus, which is determined by the intensity, duration, and nature of exercise (6). Prolonged aerobic exercise increases preload, promoting eccentric LV hypertrophy, while isometric or resistance exercises may generate significant increases in afterload, inducing concentric hypertrophy patterns (1, 7).

The type of physical training is an important determinant of cardiac adaptation. Morganroth's classical hypothesis suggested that endurance athletes would develop eccentric LV hypertrophy, whereas strength athletes would present concentric hypertrophy (1). However, subsequent studies have questioned the generalization of this hypothesis, highlighting methodological limitations of cross-sectional studies and the need for longitudinal analyses to fully understand training-specific adaptations (11). Recent evidence indicates that although endurance training promotes an increase in end-diastolic volume and eccentric hypertrophy, the magnitude and pattern of adaptation are highly individualized, influenced by genetic factors, age, sex, and the onset of sports practice (3, 4, 12).

Futsal, as a mixed-modality sport, imposes substantial cardiovascular and physical demands, combining aerobic and anaerobic efforts in intermittent high-intensity patterns (13, 14). Players frequently alternate between walking, jogging, sprinting, and rapid changes of direction, generating both volume and pressure overload on the left ventricle. This results in an intermediate pattern of ventricular hypertrophy, positioned between the classic endurance and strength models, with proportional increases in intracavitary diameters and wall thickness (15). Physiologically, futsal differs from more conventional sports such as field soccer by maintaining high-intensity effort throughout most of the match. Futsal players demonstrate an average heart rate of 177 bpm and a VO2max of 63.4 mL·kg−1·min−1, sustaining approximately 95% of playing time near maximal oxygen consumption, whereas field soccer players exhibit lower values (167 bpm, VO₂max 52.5 mL·kg−1·min−1, and 76% of time at high intensity) (14). Moreover, both U20 and adult athletes perform repeated short sprints lasting 5–6 s with high mean anaerobic power (≈470–500 W) and low fatigue indices, highlighting the need for rapid recovery during matches (1618).

Understanding cardiac adaptations in futsal athletes is crucial not only for optimizing sports performance but also for monitoring cardiovascular health. Detailed investigation of athlete's heart in mixed sports contributes to a broader understanding of exercise physiology and the prevention of cardiovascular pathologies in athletic populations. In this context, the present study aimed to examine possible structural cardiac alterations resulting from training in athletes from different categories of Brazilian elite futsal, providing insights into the physiological complexity of the sport and the specific cardiovascular demands placed on its athletes.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study group

A total of 58 athletes participated in the study, distributed into the following categories: under-18 (n = 24; mean age 17.3 ± 0.6 years; weight 78.5 ± 9.7 kg; height 1.73 ± 0.6 m), under-20 (n = 16; mean age 19.1 ± 0.7 years; weight 70.8 ± 8.8 kg; height 1.74 ± 0.7 m), and adults (n = 18; mean age 24.2 ± 8.8 years; weight 74.2 ± 8.5 kg; height 1.74 ± 0.4 m). All athletes belonged to a national elite futsal team. A convenience sample was selected, including athletes with a minimum of seven years of systematic practice in the modality and who were part of the official roster for the professional championship season. Exclusion criteria included athletes presenting any cardiometabolic comorbidity that could impair professional sports participation, as well as those who were smokers or using medications known to alter cardiac structure or function, such as beta-blockers.

The present study investigated possible cardiac alterations in professional futsal athletes through evaluations with complementary tests, including electrocardiogram (ECG), transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The examinations were analyzed by cardiologists who followed national and international guidelines and recommendations for athlete assessment.

2.2 Statistical analyses

Data were initially presented using descriptive statistics, with means and standard deviations. To verify differences among athlete categories (under-18, under-20, and professional), a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied. When a significant effect was identified, Tukey's post hoc test was performed for multiple group comparisons. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 30.0.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), while graphs were created using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

2.3 Electrocardiogram (ECG)

The 12-lead resting electrocardiogram was performed on all athletes in the supine position after a minimum rest period of 5 min, with recordings obtained at a speed of 25 mm/s. Interpretation followed the international recommendations for ECG interpretation in athletes (19). These recommendations, also known as the Seattle Criteria, aim to differentiate physiological adaptations in athletes from changes suggestive from ECG findings which might have a pathological underlying cause, which served as exclusion criteria in the present study.

2.4 Echocardiogram

The transthoracic echocardiogram was performed using a Philips Affiniti 70 ultrasound system equipped with an S5-1 phased-array transducer (1–5 MHz), following the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (20). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), and interventricular septum (IVS) thickness were obtained in M-mode from the parasternal long-axis window, with the transducer positioned perpendicular to the left ventricular axis at the level of the papillary muscles. LVEF was calculated using the Teichholz method (21), based on end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters of the left ventricle. LVMI was calculated using the Devereux formula, corrected for body surface area (22). LVEDd and IVS measurements were taken at end-diastole, with LVEDd defined as the distance between the septal wall and the posterior wall of the left ventricle, and IVS as the total thickness of the interventricular septum.

To ensure a fair comparison among athletes with different body sizes, the absolute values of the variables obtained from the examinations were indexed to body surface area. This procedure, which involves dividing each absolute measurement by the body surface area (BSA) of each individual, allows the results to be expressed as relative values. Such adjustment is essential, as it controls for the influence of body size on cardiac and physiological variables, enabling a more accurate interpretation of training-induced adaptations and reducing biases associated with differences in body structure.

Linear measurements were obtained using M-mode when proper parasternal long-axis alignment was ensured, as this technique provides high temporal resolution and reproducibility in serial evaluations.

2.5 Cardiopulmonary exercise test

The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was performed on a treadmill (INBRAMED ATL) using an incremental ramp protocol until the athlete's voluntary exhaustion (23). For measurement of respiratory and metabolic variables, a Cortex Metalyzer 3B gas analyzer was used to collect and analyze expired gases. During the test, heart rate (12-lead ECG), blood pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation were continuously monitored (24). Maximal oxygen consumption (VO₂max) was defined as the highest value achieved during exercise, expressed in absolute terms (L/min) and relative to body mass (mL/kg/min). Test termination criteria followed international guidelines (25): physical exhaustion, athlete's request, limiting symptoms (chest pain, dyspnea incompatible with activity), hemodynamic instability, desaturation (<92%), ST-segment elevation, sustained tachyarrhythmias, and atrioventricular block.

3 Results

The descriptive analysis (Table 1) showed that VO₂max values were higher in the U20 category (52.81 ± 5.12 mL·kg−1·min−1) compared to adults (47.94 ± 5.83 mL·kg−1·min−1), while U18 athletes presented intermediate values (51.45 ± 3.79 mL·kg−1·min−1). The right ventricular end-diastolic diameter was greater in U18 athletes (51.50 ± 3.35 mm) compared to U20 (40.56 ± 5.82 mm) and adults (37.22 ± 5.43 mm). The cardiac mass index showed a trend toward progressive increase across categories, although without statistically significant differences. In contrast, left atrial and ventricular dimensions demonstrated an increase in atrial volumes (absolute and indexed) between U20 and adults, whereas left ventricular values remained similar among groups.

Table 1

Variable Category N Mean SD
VO₂max (mL·kg−1·min−1) U18 24 51,45 3,789
U20 16 52,81 5,115
Adult 18 47,94 5,826
Total 58 50,74 5,166
Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm) U18 24 51,50 3,349
U20 16 40,56 5,819
Adult 18 37,22 5,429
Total 58 44,05 7,983
Cardiac Mass Index (g/m²) U18 24 75,1708 10,76482
U20 16 78,1688 15,40146
Adult 18 82,2778 15,09112
Total 58 78,2034 13,64622
Inferolateral Left Ventricular Wall (mm) U18 24 7,75 ,847
U20 16 8,38 ,806
Adult 18 8,50 ,857
Total 58 8,16 ,894
Interventricular Septum (mm) U18 24 7,71 ,751
U20 16 8,31 ,873
Adult 18 8,39 1,092
Total 58 8,09 ,942
Ejection Fraction (%) (Teichholz Method) U18 24 ,6579 ,04344
U20 16 ,6331 ,03790
Adult 18 ,6500 ,03804
Total 58 ,6486 ,04093
Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter (mm) U18 24 33,67 3,583
U20 15 32,33 3,039
Adult 18 31,72 5,004
Total 57 32,70 3,991
Indexed Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter (mm/m2) U18 24 28,0958 2,03202
U20 15 27,1600 2,07289
Adult 18 27,4056 2,11005
Total 57 27,6316 2,07125
Left Atrial Volume (mL) U18 18 23,57 5,530
U20 15 38,87 19,935
Adult 17 51,00 12,629
Total 50 37,49 17,644
Left Atrial Volume (mL/m2) U18 19 12,20 3,997
U20 15 20,69 10,215
Adult 17 26,76 6,068
Total 51 19,55 9,240
Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm) U18 24 51,50 3,349
U20 15 50,20 3,986
Adult 18 52,00 4,102
Total 57 51,32 3,766
Indexed Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm/m2) U18 24 28,10 2,032
U20 15 27,16 2,073
Adult 18 27,41 2,110
Total 57 27,63 2,071
Left Ventricular Mass (g) U18 24 138,4558 24,15158
U20 15 147,7180 29,48924
Adult 18 156,7717 32,47609
Total 57 146,6772 28,96824
Indexed Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm/m²) U18 24 11,4917 1,93883
U20 16 14,7250 6,55840
Adult 18 18,7056 2,67790
Total 58 14,6224 4,93655

Descriptive statistics of physiological and anatomical indicators by athlete category.

N, subjects; SD, standard deviation.

ANOVA (Table 2) confirmed significant differences between categories for VO2max (p = 0.013), indexed right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (p < 0.001), left ventricular inferolateral wall thickness (p = 0.011), interventricular septum thickness (p = 0.033), as well as absolute (p < 0.001) and indexed (p < 0.001) left atrial volume. No differences were observed between groups for ejection fraction, cardiac mass index, left ventricular mass, or left ventricular end-diastolic diameter.

Table 2

Variable Source of variation DF Sum of squares F p
VO₂max (mL·kg−1·min−1) Between Groups 2 221,509 4,687 ,013
Within Groups 55 1299,581
Total 57 1521,090
Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm) Between Groups 2 2365,796 51,347 ,000
Within Groups 55 1267,049
Total 57 3632,845
Cardiac Mass Index (g/m2) Between Groups 2 519,544 1,415 ,252
Within Groups 55 10094,955
Total 57 10614,499
Inferolateral Left Ventricular Wall (mm) Between Groups 2 6,853 4,864 ,011
Within Groups 55 38,750
Total 57 45,603
Interventricular Septum (mm) Between Groups 2 5,895 3,629 ,033
Within Groups 55 44,674
Total 57 50,569
Ejection Fraction (%) (Teichholz Method) Between Groups 2 ,006 1,827 ,170
Within Groups 55 ,090
Total 57 ,095
Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter (mm) Between Groups 2 41,652 1,323 ,275
Within Groups 54 850,278
Total 56 891,930
Indexed Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter (mm/m2) Between Groups 2 9,428 1,103 ,339
Within Groups 54 230,815
Total 56 240,243
Left Atrial Volume (mL) Between Groups 2 6617,951 18,009 ,000
Within Groups 47 8635,549
Total 49 15253,500
Left Atrial Volume Index (mL/m2) Between Groups 2 1931,801 19,835 ,000
Within Groups 48 2337,440
Total 50 4269,241
Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm) Between Groups 2 27,916 ,983 ,381
Within Groups 54 766,400
Total 56 794,316
Indexed Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm/m2) Between Groups 2 9,428 1,103 ,339
Within Groups 54 230,815
Total 56 240,243
Left Ventricular Mass (g) Between Groups 2 3472,598 2,154 ,126
Within Groups 54 43520,317
Total 56 46992,916
Indexed Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm/m2) Between Groups 2 535,503 17,253 ,000
Within Groups 55 853,558
Total 57 1389,061

ANOVA of physiological and anatomical indicators by athlete category.

DF, degrees of freedom; F, F-statistic; p, statistical significance.

Tukey's multiple comparisons (Table 3) identified the groups responsible for the differences. VO₂max was significantly higher in U20 athletes compared to adults (p = 0.014). Indexed right ventricular end-diastolic diameter was greater in U18 athletes than in U20 and adults (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Left ventricular inferolateral wall thickness (p = 0.016) and interventricular septum thickness (p = 0.048) were greater in adults compared to U18. Left atrial volume, both absolute and indexed, increased progressively from U18 to U20 (p = 0.006 and p = 0.003, respectively) and from U20 to adults (p = 0.039 and p = 0.046), with even more pronounced differences between adults and U18 (p < 0.001 for both variables). Finally, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic diameter was significantly higher in adults compared to U18 (p < 0.001) and U20 (p = 0.013), with a difference also observed between U20 and U18 (p = 0.036).

Table 3

Dependent variable (I) category (J) category MD (I-J) SE p 95% CI
Lower bound Upper bound
VO2max (mL·kg−1·min−1) U18 U20 −1,362 1,569 ,662 −5,14 2,42
Adult 3,506 1,516 ,062 −,14 7,16
U20 U18 1,362 1,569 ,662 −2,42 5,14
Adult 4,868* 1,670 ,014 ,85 8,89
Adult U18 −3,506 1,516 ,062 −7,16 ,14
U20 −4,868* 1,670 ,014 −8,89 −,85
Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm) U18 U20 10,938* 1,549 ,000 7,21 14,67
Adult 14,278* 1,497 ,000 10,67 17,88
U20 U18 −10,938* 1,549 ,000 −14,67 −7,21
Adult 3,340 1,649 ,116 −,63 7,31
Adult U18 −14,278* 1,497 ,000 −17,88 −10,67
U20 −3,340 1,649 ,116 −7,31 ,63
Cardiac Mass Index (g/m²) U18 U20 −2,99792 4,37255 ,773 −13,5303 7,5345
Adult −7,10694 4,22429 ,221 −17,2822 3,0683
U20 U18 2,99792 4,37255 ,773 −7,5345 13,5303
Adult −4,10903 4,65494 ,653 −15,3216 7,1036
Adult U18 7,10694 4,22429 ,221 −3,0683 17,2822
U20 4,10903 4,65494 ,653 −7,1036 15,3216
Inferolateral Left Ventricular Wall (mm) U18 U20 −,625 ,271 ,063 −1,28 ,03
Adult −,750* ,262 ,016 −1,38 −,12
U20 U18 ,625 ,271 ,063 −,03 1,28
Adult −,125 ,288 ,902 −,82 ,57
Adult U18 ,750* ,262 ,016 ,12 1,38
U20 ,125 ,288 ,902 −,57 ,82
Interventricular Septum (mm) U18 U20 −,604 ,291 ,104 −1,30 ,10
Adult −,681* ,281 ,048 −1,36 ,00
U20 U18 ,604 ,291 ,104 −,10 1,30
Adult −,076 ,310 ,967 −,82 ,67
Adult U18 ,681* ,281 ,048 ,00 1,36
U20 ,076 ,310 ,967 −,67 ,82
Ejection Fraction (%) (Teichholz Method) U18 U20 ,02479 ,01302 ,147 −,0066 ,0562
Adult ,00792 ,01258 ,805 −,0224 ,0382
U20 U18 −,02479 ,01302 ,147 −,0562 ,0066
Adult −,01687 ,01386 ,448 −,0503 ,0165
Adult U18 −,00792 ,01258 ,805 −,0382 ,0224
U20 ,01687 ,01386 ,448 −,0165 ,0503
Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter (mm) U18 U20 1,333* 1,306 ,567 −1,81 4,48
Adult 1,944 1,237 ,267 −1,04 4,93
U20 U18 −1,333* 1,306 ,567 −4,48 1,81
Adult ,611* 1,387 ,899 −2,73 3,95
Adult U18 −1,944 1,237 ,267 −4,93 1,04
U20 −,611* 1,387 ,899 −3,95 2,73
Indexed Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter (mm/m²) U18 U20 ,93583 ,68048 ,361 −,7041 2,5758
Adult ,69028 ,64464 ,536 −,8633 2,2439
U20 U18 −,93583 ,68048 ,361 −2,5758 ,7041
Adult −,24556 ,72279 ,938 −1,9875 1,4963
Adult U18 −,69028 ,64464 ,536 −2,2439 ,8633
U20 ,24556 ,72279 ,938 −1,4963 1,9875
Left Atrial Volume (mL) U18 U20 −15,294* 4,739 ,006 −26,76 −3,83
Adult −27,428* 4,584 ,000 −38,52 −16,33
U20 U18 15,294* 4,739 ,006 3,83 26,76
Adult −12,133* 4,802 ,039 −23,75 −,51
Adult U18 27,428* 4,584 ,000 16,33 38,52
U20 12,133* 4,802 ,039 ,51 23,75
Left Atrial Volume Index (mL/m²) U18 U20 −8,496* 2,410 ,003 −14,33 −2,67
Adult −14,568* 2,330 ,000 −20,20 −8,93
U20 U18 8,496* 2,410 ,003 2,67 14,33
Adult −6,071* 2,472 ,046 −12,05 −,09
Adult U18 14,568* 2,330 ,000 8,93 20,20
U20 6,071* 2,472 ,046 ,09 12,05
Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm) U18 U20 1,300 1,240 ,550 −1,69 4,29
Adult −,500 1,175 ,905 −3,33 2,33
U20 U18 −1,300 1,240 ,550 −4,29 1,69
Adult −1,800 1,317 ,365 −4,97 1,37
Adult U18 ,500 1,175 ,905 −2,33 3,33
U20 1,800 1,317 ,365 −1,37 4,97
Indexed Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm/m²) U18 U20 ,936 ,680 ,361 −,70 2,58
Adult ,690 ,645 ,536 −,86 2,24
U20 U18 −,936 ,680 ,361 −2,58 ,70
Adult −,246 ,723 ,938 −1,99 1,50
Adult U18 −,690 ,645 ,536 −2,24 ,86
U20 ,246 ,723 ,938 −1,50 1,99
Left Ventricular Mass (g) U18 U20 −9,26217 9,34394 ,586 −31,7809 13,2566
Adult −18,31583 8,85181 ,106 −39,6485 3,0169
U20 U18 9,26217 9,34394 ,586 −13,2566 31,7809
Adult −9,05367 9,92486 ,635 −32,9724 14,8651
Adult U18 18,31583 8,85181 ,106 −3,0169 39,6485
U20 9,05367 9,92486 ,635 −14,8651 32,9724
Indexed Right Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter (mm/m²) U18 U20 −3,23333* 1,27145 ,036 −6,2959 −,1707
Adult −7,21389* 1,22834 ,000 −10,1726 −4,2551
U20 U18 3,23333* 1,27145 ,036 ,1707 6,2959
Adult −3,98056* 1,35356 ,013 −7,2410 −,7202
Adult U18 7,21389* 1,22834 ,000 4,2551 10,1726
U20 3,98056* 1,35356 ,013 ,7202 7,2410

Multiple comparisons (tukey HSD) and significant differences between categories.

I, initial comparison category; J, secondary comparison category; MD, mean difference; SE, standard error; p, statistical significance; CI, Confidence interval.

*

The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Overall, the results indicate that, although VO₂max is higher in U20 athletes, adults exhibit greater cardiac remodeling, evidenced by increased ventricular wall thickness, atrial volumes, and right ventricular dimensions when indexed to body surface area.

Analysis of physiological and anatomical indicators (Figures 15) revealed significant differences between categories. VO₂max was higher in the U20 group compared to adults (p < 0.05). Regarding cardiac dimensions, absolute and indexed right ventricular end-diastolic diameter was significantly lower in U18 athletes compared to U20 and adults (p < 0.05), with an additional difference between U20 and adults in the right ventricular index (p < 0.05). Absolute and indexed left atrial volumes also differed, being lower in the U18 group compared to U20 and adults, with an additional difference between U20 and adults for the indexed volume (p < 0.05). Furthermore, left ventricular inferolateral wall thickness and interventricular septum thickness were greater in adults compared to the U18 group (p < 0.05). In contrast, variables such as cardiac mass index, ejection fraction, left atrial anteroposterior diameter (absolute and indexed), as well as left ventricular diameter and mass, did not show significant differences between categories.

Figure 1

Three bar charts compare VO2max, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and cardiac mass index across under-18, under-20, and adult groups. The left chart shows similar VO2max values, with annotations indicating statistical differences. The middle chart shows smaller diameters for younger groups, with symbols denoting differences. The right chart displays similar cardiac mass index values, with annotations. Legends explain statistical significance symbols: asterisk for under-18 and under-20 differences, hash for under-18 and adult differences, and ampersand for under-20 and adult differences.

Comparison of VO2max (mL·kg−1·min−1), indexed right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (mm), and cardiac mass Index (g/m2) among the under-18, under-20, and adult categories. *Indicates a difference between under-18 and under-20, # indicates a difference between under-18 and adult, and & indicates a difference between under-20 and Adult.

Figure 2

Three bar graphs compare cardiac measurements among Under-18, Under-20, and Adults groups. The first graph shows the Inferolateral Left Ventricular Wall thickness in millimeters, with a significant difference between Under-18 and Adults. The second graph displays the Interventricular Septum thickness, noting a difference between Under-20 and Adults. The third graph shows Ejection Fraction percentages using the Teichholz Method, with no significant differences noted. Legends indicate specific differences for each group comparison.

Comparison of inferolateral left ventricular wall (mm), interventricular septum (mm), and ejection fraction (%) (teichholz method) among the under-18, under-20, and adult categories. *Indicates a difference between under-18 and under-20, # indicates a difference between under-18 and adult, and & indicates a difference between under-20 and adult.

Figure 3

Three bar graphs compare left atrial measurements across age groups: Under-18, Under-20, and Adults. The first graph shows left atrial anteroposterior diameter in millimeters, the second graph shows indexed left atrial anteroposterior diameter in millimeters per square meter, and the third graph shows left atrial volume in milliliters. Legends indicate significant differences between the groups, with asterisks showing differences between Under-18 and Under-20, hashtags between Under-18 and Adults, and ampersands between Under-20 and Adults.

Comparison of left atrial anteroposterior diameter (mm), indexed left atrial anteroposterior diameter (mm/m2), and left atrial volume (mL) among the under-18, under-20, and adult categories. *Indicates a difference between under-18 and under-20, # indicates a difference between under-18 and adult, and & indicates a difference between under-20 and adult.

Figure 4

Bar chart comparing left atrial volume index, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter across under-18, under-20, and adults. The left atrial volume index shows significant differences with legends indicating specific group differences: under-18 versus under-20 (*), under-20 versus adults (&), and under-18 versus adults (#).

Comparison of left atrial volume Index (mL/m2), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (mm), and indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (mm/m2) among the under-18, under-20, and adult categories. *Indicates difference between under-18 and under-20, # indicates difference between under-18 and adult, and & indicates difference between under-20 and adult.

Figure 5

Bar graphs comparing left ventricular mass and indexed right ventricular end-diastolic diameter for three groups: Under-18, Under-20, and Adults. Significant differences are indicated: Under-18 vs. Under-20 (*), Under-18 vs. Adults (#), and Under-20 vs. Adults (&).

Comparison of left ventricular mass (g) and indexed right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (mm/m2) among the under-18, under-20, and adult categories. *Indicates a difference between under-18 and under-20, # indicates a difference between under-18 and adult, and & indicates a difference between under-20 and adult.

4 Discussion

The results of the present study showed that U20 athletes exhibited higher maximal oxygen consumption (VO₂max) compared to adult athletes. This finding may be partially associated with the progressive decline in aerobic capacity that occurs from the third decade of life, shortly after reaching its physiological peak. Although the mean age of the adult category investigated was approximately 24 years, the high age variability observed (standard deviation of 8.8 years) indicates the presence of athletes within age ranges where a reduction in cardiorespiratory fitness is already expected. Moreover, the negative association identified between age and VO₂max supports this hypothesis. Similar results were reported by Parpa et al. (26), who analyzed soccer players and demonstrated that athletes aged 18–24 years had significantly higher VO₂max values compared to athletes aged 25–35 years. In addition, U20 athletes may perform a greater volume of high-intensity actions due to the technical-tactical demands specific to this category. In contrast, more experienced athletes tend to adopt game strategies more focused on tactical control and recovery during training sessions, which may contribute to the differences in VO₂max observed in this study (27). In contrast, more experienced athletes tend to adopt game strategies more focused on tactical control and recovery during training sessions, which may contribute to the differences in VO2max observed in this study (7, 27). In fact, the professional athletes evaluated in the present study had a longer cumulative training history and greater competitive experience compared to players from the younger categories, which likely influenced the physiological and tactical distinctions observed between groups. It should be noted, however, that these hypotheses are mostly derived from studies conducted in soccer, and confirmation is needed in future investigations specifically in futsal, given the scarcity of evidence for this sport.

Additionally, Barbero-Álvarez et al. (28) evaluated the physiological demands of ten professional male futsal athletes during four official matches, using heart rate as the primary monitoring variable. The results indicated high aerobic demand, with a mean heart rate of 174 ± 7 bpm, corresponding to 90 ± 2% of HRmax (range 86%–93%). Supporting these findings (17, 18), in a study with simulated matches, demonstrated that athletes spend approximately 46% of the time at intensities above 80% of VO₂max, with an average oxygen consumption around 76% and peaks close to 99% of VO₂max. Complementarily, Bekris et al. (29) observed substantially elevated blood lactate concentrations, reaching 14.9 ± 4.9 mmol/L in the first half and 15.0 ± 4.7 mmol/L in the second half. Collectively, these findings reinforce the characterization of futsal as a high-intensity intermittent sport, marked by successive accelerations, decelerations, and sprints, with or without changes of direction, interspersed with short recovery periods (30).

It can be stated that chronic exposure of athletes to training loads, particularly those related to endurance training, promotes the development of structural and morphological adaptations that make the body more efficient in energy supply during physical effort (31). In this context, the myocardium is expected to exhibit functional, structural, and regulatory adaptations, including increased ventricular mass, changes in cardiac chamber dimensions, and modifications in wall thickness (1, 32, 33).

In the present study, it was observed that more experienced athletes, and therefore with greater accumulated training time, exhibited increased interventricular septum thickness and left ventricular inferior lateral wall thickness. This adaptation is frequently described in the literature among healthy athletes (34). Accordingly, Venckunas et al. (35), when analyzing echocardiographic parameters across different sports modalities, observed that sedentary men had lower measurements compared to all athlete groups. However, basketball and strength/power athletes exhibited greater interventricular septum thickness compared to middle-distance runners. Similarly, Pluim et al. (36) reported that strength and power athletes had higher interventricular septum thickness values (10.5 mm) compared to endurance athletes (8.8 mm), a difference not observed for posterior wall thickness. These data help explain why, the longer the exposure to futsal training a sport characterized by intermittent and high-intensity efforts, in which strength and power are inherently involved in the tactical context of the game the greater the hypertrophic adaptations of the left ventricular inferior lateral wall and interventricular septum. This phenomenon, already documented in previous studies, contributes to understanding why adult futsal athletes exhibit higher values than younger categories.

When analyzing absolute and indexed left atrial volume, ANOVA confirmed significant differences between groups (p < 0.001). Tukey's post-hoc test revealed the following: U18 < U20, U18 < Adult, and U20 < Adult, for both absolute and indexed volume. These results suggest that, similarly to the hypertrophic adaptations of the left ventricle, progressive exposure to training loads promotes atrial remodeling, resulting in increased left atrial size through a process of eccentric hypertrophy, classically associated with the concept of the “athlete's heart”. Previous studies consistently demonstrate that both training volume and intensity correlate with increased atrial volume (37, 38).

Accordingly, Nistri et al. (39), when evaluating 418 healthy individuals aged 16 years or older, observed a higher indexed left atrial volume in athletes (38.9 ± 9.6 mL/m2) compared to non-athletes (28.4 ± 5.8 mL/m2). Similarly, D'Andrea et al. (37) reported a high prevalence of mild to moderate left atrial enlargement (27.5%) in a cohort of 615 elite athletes (mean age 28.4 ± 10.2 years; range 18–40), evaluated at a sports medicine reference center.

As previously discussed, in addition to absolute volume, indexed left atrial volume was higher in adult athletes, reflecting not only body size but primarily a chronic cardiac adaptation resulting from systematic training. It is important to emphasize, however, that despite the significant increase in atrial cavity size due to continuous exposure to elevated preload characteristic of the training program the observed dimensions remained within anatomical limits compatible with normal physiological cardiac function, thus representing a benign and adaptive remodeling (40).

Contrary to what might be expected, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic diameter was significantly greater in the U18 group compared to U20 and adults, which did not differ from each other. During intense exercise, this chamber is subjected to disproportionately increased pressures and volumes relative to the left ventricle, due to its smaller muscular mass (approximately one-quarter less than that of the left ventricle) and thinner wall. These factors result in a higher relative workload and greater wall stress in the right ventricle compared to the left. Repetitive volumetric overload, in turn, induces eccentric remodeling characterized by cavity dilation and increased compliance, allowing greater capacity to accommodate blood flow (41).

Our findings are in line with those reported by Augustine et al. (42), who also observed that a considerable proportion of adolescent footballers present right-ventricular dimensions exceeding adult reference ranges. However, while their work established normative values, it did not provide a detailed physiological explanation for this pattern. In our interpretation, the larger right-ventricular diameters in younger athletes may reflect developmental and hemodynamic factors related to cardiac maturation, higher chamber compliance, and predominance of volume-loading stimuli during early athletic training phases.

Furthermore, the progressive deterioration of diastolic function with aging, even in healthy and well-trained individuals, may partially account for the smaller right-ventricular diameters observed in older athletes. Age-related myocardial changes, including increased peripheral resistance, extracellular matrix proliferation, collagen cross-linking, and altered calcium handling, are known to reduce ventricular compliance and impair relaxation (43). Aging alone, however, may not totally explain all the changes that occur during myocardial senescence. Other factors that change with age such as diminishing cardiovascular fitness could also contribute to the gradual decrease of diastolic function. Thus, the greater right-ventricular dimensions observed in U18 athletes likely reflect not only the adaptive response to exercise stimuli but also the inherent physiological advantage of a younger, more compliant myocardium.

On the other hand, several analyzed parameters did not show significant differences between groups, including left atrial anteroposterior diameter, ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (absolute and indexed), and left ventricular mass index. Specifically regarding the left atrium, although an increase in volume was observed, anteroposterior diameter did not follow the same trend. This result may be explained by atrial chamber geometry, which does not expand uniformly in all directions (44). In other words, atrial volume can increase substantially without significant changes in the anteroposterior dimension, which is a unidimensional measure and may not accurately reflect the true size of the chamber. For this reason, current guidelines recommend assessing the left atrium via volumetric measurement (biplane method) rather than linear anteroposterior diameter (20). The findings of the present study support this recommendation: the absence of differences in anteroposterior diameter, contrasted with clear volumetric increases, indicates that only volumetric assessment was able to capture the atrial remodeling effectively present in older athletes.

Left ventricular ejection fraction was similar across the three groups, with no statistically significant differences, and all values remained within normal limits. This result was expected, as in the athlete's heart, systolic function tends to remain normal despite changes in cardiac geometry. Supporting these findings, Cabanelas, Freitas, and Gonçalves (45) analyzed soccer athletes using echocardiography and observed that ejection fraction did not vary significantly in serial evaluations, indicating preserved contractile function under basal conditions. Similarly, our results suggest that increases in atrial volume and other structural adaptations did not compromise systolic performance, reinforcing that this represents a physiological adaptive process. This pattern contrasts with pathological conditions, where morphological and structural chamber alterations are generally associated with functional impairment. Preservation of left ventricular ejection fraction around 60%, or slightly lower values in endurance athletes at rest, can be interpreted as part of a functional adjustment: larger cardiac chambers can maintain efficient output through compensatory mechanisms (Frank-Starling law) and increased resting vagal tone, which may slightly reduce ejection fraction without clinical implications.

Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, both absolute and indexed, did not differ significantly between groups. This suggests that left ventricular dimensions may already be near a plateau of adaptation to training from youth. Additionally, from the age of 18, the heart may preferentially adapt through wall hypertrophy rather than further internal diameter expansion concentric vs. eccentric hypertrophy (45). Increases in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter are classically associated with dynamic sports involving high exercise volumes, which induce greater cardiac output and blood pressure load. This characteristic, however, differs partially from futsal, a mixed sport in which intermittent demands for strength, power, and endurance coexist (30, 36). These hypotheses also help explain the absence of increased left ventricular mass index from U18 to professional levels, as observed in our findings.

Finally, although some structural adaptations observed in this study reinforce a chronic training-induced adaptive process, it should be considered that futsal, compared to classical endurance sports, retains hybrid characteristics, combining strength and power elements with substantial aerobic demands. This mixed nature may result in morphological and structural adaptations that are less pronounced than those observed in predominantly aerobic sports, such as long-distance running (4648). For comparison, Sjödin and Svedenhag (49) reported mean VO₂max values of 71.8 ± 1.2 mL/kg/min in long-distance runners, whereas the mean obtained in the sample of the present study was 50.7 ± 5.17 mL/kg/min approximately 30% lower. This difference may be directly related to the absence of more pronounced chronic adaptations in certain structural variables in the futsal athlete group evaluated.

5 Conclusion

The present study identified significant differences in cardiorespiratory and cardiac structural variables among under-18, under-20, and adult futsal athletes, particularly in VO₂max, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, ventricular wall thickness, and left atrial volume indices. Adult athletes exhibited higher values in several parameters, reflecting cumulative physiological adaptations associated with increased competitive demands and prolonged training exposure. These results support the relationship between sport progression and cardiac remodeling characteristic of the “athlete's heart”, with implications for clinical assessment and monitoring of athletes transitioning to higher performance levels.

Practically, the findings may assist clinicians and coaches in interpreting cardiac adaptations across developmental stages, aiding in the identification of expected physiological responses and reducing the risk of misinterpreting adaptive changes as pathological. They also contribute to individualized monitoring strategies aimed at ensuring safety and optimizing performance.

This study has limitations. Its cross-sectional design prevents causal inferences regarding training duration, competitive level, and cardiac remodeling; longitudinal research is needed to better characterize cardiovascular adaptation throughout athletes' careers. Additionally, previous training load data could not be standardized due to player transfers, and data collection occurred before the start of the season, as cardiological evaluations are required prior to organized training.

Finally, although current echocardiographic guidelines recommend 2D linear measurements for chamber quantification, M-mode was used when optimal acoustic windows were available, and volumetric measures were obtained from 2D images. This methodological choice, consistent with clinical practice, should be acknowledged when interpreting the results.

6 Limitations

This study presents as a limitation its cross-sectional design, which may hinder the establishment of causal relationships between age, training exposure, and cardiac or cardiorespiratory adaptations. Therefore, longitudinal studies are necessary to confirm these findings. Previous training load could not be standardized due to athlete transfers, and assessments were conducted before the beginning of the competitive season, which limits control over recent training stimuli.

Another limitation concerns the indexation of cardiac parameters exclusively to body surface area, although widely recommended (20); alternative indexation methods may provide additional insights. Moreover, although extracurricular physical activity during the season is contraindicated for professional athletes, information on previous-season activity outside current club environments was unavailable. Still, the short off-season typical of futsal is unlikely to induce substantial chronic adaptations.

Additionally, some interpretations are based on evidence from soccer because of the scarcity of futsal-specific studies, which may restrict the precision of modality-specific inferences. Finally, maturational factors in younger athletes may have contributed to the differences observed in right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and the mixed physiological nature of futsal may partially explain the absence of more pronounced cardiac adaptations in some variables.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universidade São Judas Tadeu. Written informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from the legal guardians of the participants. The experimental protocol was also approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil, under protocol number 37500414.4.0000.0089. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

LP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DB: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. TB: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. DP: Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. MV: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participating athletes and the club's technical staff for their collaboration.

Conflict of interest

Authors LP and DB were employed by company Sport Club Corinthians Paulista.

Authors LP and YC were employed by company Center of Excellence in Exercise Physiology and Training—NEFET.

Author TB was employed by company Sfera Futebol Clube—Health and Performance Center.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. This manuscript utilized generative artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT—OpenAI) solely to assist with scientific writing, language editing, and textual organization. All information, analyses, interpretations, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors, who thoroughly reviewed the generated content to ensure accuracy, originality, and ethical compliance. No content was automated without human supervision.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.

    Morganroth J Maron BJ Henry W Epstein SE . Comparative left ventricular dimensions in trained athletes. Ann Intern Med. (1975) 82:5214. 10.7326/0003-4819-82-4-521

  • 2.

    Rawlins J Bhan A Sharma S . Left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes. Eur J Echocardiogr. (2009) 10:3506. 10.1093/ejechocard/jep017

  • 3.

    Neri V Ambrosi A Fersini A Tartaglia N Lapolla F Forlano I . Severe acute pancreatitis: clinical forms of different gravity. Ann Ital Chir. (2013) 84:4753.

  • 4.

    Lamotte M Fleury F Pirard M Jamon A van de Borne P . Acute cardiovascular response to resistance training during cardiac rehabilitation: effect of repetition speed and rest periods. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2010) 17:32936. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328332efdd

  • 5.

    Arena R Myers J Guazzi M . The clinical significance of aerobic exercise testing and prescription: from apparently healthy to confirmed cardiovascular disease. Am J of Lifestyle Med. (2008) 2(6):51936. 10.1177/1559827608323210

  • 6.

    Rawlins J Carre F Kervio G Papadakis M Chandra N Edwards C et al Ethnic differences in physiological cardiac adaptation to intense physical exercise in highly trained female athletes. Circulation. (2010) 121(9):107885. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.917211

  • 7.

    Bangsbo J Mohr M Krustrup P . Physical and metabolic demands of training and match-play in the elite football player. J Sports Sci. (2006) 24:66574. 10.1080/02640410500482529

  • 8.

    Bramanti V Tomassoni D Grasso S Bronzi D Napoli M Campisi A et al Cholinergic precursors modulate the expression of heme oxigenase-1, p21 during astroglial cell proliferation and differentiation in culture. Neurochem Res. (2012) 37:2795804. 10.1007/s11064-012-0873-3

  • 9.

    Mielgo-Ayuso J Maroto-Sánchez B Luzardo-Socorro R Palacios G Palacios Gil-Antuñano N González-Gross M . Evaluation of nutritional status and energy expenditure in athletes. Nutr Hosp. (2015) 31:22736. 10.3305/nh.2015.31.sup3.8770

  • 10.

    Francavilla CV Sessa F Salerno M Albano GD Villano I Messina G et al Influence of football on physiological cardiac indexes in professional and young athletes. Front Physiol. (2018) 9:153. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00153

  • 11.

    Vyshka G Vacchiano G . Severe flaccid paraparesis following spinal anaesthesia: a sine materia occurrence. BMJ Case Rep. (2014) 2014:bcr2013202071. 10.1136/bcr-2013-202071

  • 12.

    Lamotte M Niset G Van de Borne P . The effect of different modalities of resistance training on beat to beat blood pressure in cardiac patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. (2005) 12:127.

  • 13.

    Rodrigues VM Ramos GP Mendes TT Cabido CE Melo ES Condessa LA et al Intensity of official futsal matches. J Strength Cond Res. (2011) 25(9):24827. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181fb4574

  • 14.

    Nunes RFH Almeida FAM Santos BV Almeida FDM Nogas G Elsangedy HM et al Comparação de indicadores físicos e fisiológicos entre atletas profissionais de futsal e futebol. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física. (2012) 18:10412. 10.1590/S1980-65742012000100011

  • 15.

    Zurutuza U Castellano J Echeazarra I Casamichana D . Absolute and relative training load and its relation to fatigue in football. Front Psychol. (2017) 8:878. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00878

  • 16.

    Barbieri FA Barbieri RA Queiroga MR Santana WC Kokubun E . Perfil antropométrico e fisiológico de atletas de futsal da categoria sub-20 e adulta. Motricidade. (2012) 8(4):6270. 10.6063/motricidade.8(4).1553

  • 17.

    Castagna C Impellizzeri F Cecchini E Rampinini E Álvarez JCB . Effects of intermittent-endurance fitness on match performance in young male soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. (2009) 23(7):19549. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b7f743

  • 18.

    Castagna C D’Ottavio S Vera JG Álvarez JCB . Match demands of professional futsal: a case study. J Sci Med Sport. (2009) 12(4):4904. 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.02.001

  • 19.

    Drezner JA Sharma S Baggish A Papadakis M Wilson MG Prutkin JM et al International criteria for electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. (2017) 51(9):70431. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097331

  • 20.

    Lang RM Badano L Mor-Avi V Afilalo J Armstrong A Ernande L et al Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2015) 28(1):139.e14. 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003

  • 21.

    Teichholz LE Kreulen T Herman MV Gorlin R . Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. (1976) 37(1):711. 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90491-4

  • 22.

    Devereux RB Alonso DR Lutas EM Gottlieb GJ Campo E Sachs I et al Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. (1986) 57(6):4508. 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90771-x

  • 23.

    Guazzi M Arena R Halle M Piepoli MF Myers J Lavie CJ . 2016 Focused update: clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Eur Heart J. (2018) 39(14):114461. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw180

  • 24.

    Dores H Antunes M Caldeira D Pereira HV . Cardiovascular benefits of resistance exercise: it’s time to prescribe. Rev Port Cardiol. (2024) 43(10):57382. 10.1016/j.repc.2024.02.009

  • 25.

    American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 10th ed.Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer (2021).

  • 26.

    Parpa K Michaelides M . Anthropometric characteristics and aerobic performance of professional soccer players by playing position and age. Hum Mov. (2022) 23(4):4453. 10.5114/hm.2022.110124

  • 27.

    Mendez-Villanueva A Buchheit M Simpson B Bourdon PC . Match play intensity distribution in youth soccer. Int J Sports Med. (2013) 34(2):10110. 10.1055/s-0032-1306323

  • 28.

    Barbero-Álvarez JC Soto VM Barbero-Álvarez V Granda-Vera J . Match analysis and heart rate of futsal players during competition. J Sports Sci. (2008) 26(1):6373. 10.1080/02640410701287289

  • 29.

    Bekris E Gioldasis A Gissis I Katis A Mitrousis I Mylonis E . Effects of a futsal game on metabolic, hormonal, and muscle damage indicators of male futsal players. J Strength Cond Res. (2022) 36(2):54550. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003466

  • 30.

    Caetano FG de Oliveira Bueno MJ Marche AL Nakamura FY Cunha SA Moura FA . Characterization of the sprint and repeated-sprint sequences performed by professional futsal players, according to playing position, during official matches. J Appl Biomech. (2015) 31:4239. 10.1123/jab.2014-0159

  • 31.

    Buchheit M Laursen PB . High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med. (2013) 43(5):31338. 10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x

  • 32.

    Maron BJ Levine BD Washington RL Baggish AL Kovacs RJ Maron MS et al Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: task force 2: preparticipation screening for cardiovascular disease in competitive athletes: a scientific statement from the American heart association and American college of cardiology. Circulation. (2015) 132:e26772. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.034

  • 33.

    De Innocentiis C Ricci F Khanji MY Aung N Tana C Verrengia E et al Athlete’s heart: diagnostic challenges and future perspectives. Sports Med. (2018) 48:246377. 10.1007/s40279-018-0985-2

  • 34.

    Boraita A Díaz-Gonzalez L Valenzuela PL Heras ME Morales-Acuna F Castillo-García A et al Normative values for sport-specific left ventricular dimensions and exercise-induced cardiac remodeling in elite Spanish male and female athletes. Sports Med Open. (2022) 8(1):116. 10.1186/s40798-022-00510-2

  • 35.

    Venckunas T Semenova EA Zempo H Pranckeviciene E Galkavicius G Stadnik A et al Echocardiographic parameters in athletes of different sports. J Sports Sci Med. (2008) 7(1):1516.

  • 36.

    Pluim BM Zwinderman AH van der Laarse A van der Wall EE . The athlete’s heart: a meta-analysis of cardiac structure and function. Circulation. (2000) 101(3):33644. 10.1161/01.CIR.101.3.336

  • 37.

    D’Andrea A Riegler L Cocchia R Scarafile R Salerno G Gravino R et al Left atrial volume index in highly trained athletes. Am Heart J. (2010) 159(6):115561. 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.03.036

  • 38.

    Iskandar A Mujtaba MT Thompson PD . Left atrium size in elite athletes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 8(7):75362. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.032

  • 39.

    Nistri S Galderisi M Ballo P Lisi M Santoro C D’Andrea A et al Determinants of echocardiographic left atrial volume: implications for normalcy. Eur J Echocardiogr. (2011) 12(11):82633. 10.1093/ejechocard/jer137

  • 40.

    Babio GD Janavel GV Constantin I Masson G Carrero C Botta TG et al Atrial size and sports. A great training for a greater left atrium: how much is too much? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2021) 37(3):9818. 10.1007/s10554-020-02082-2

  • 41.

    D’Andrea A Morello A Iacono AM Scarafile R Cocchia R Riegler L et al Right ventricular changes in highly trained athletes: between physiology and pathophysiology. J Cardiovasc Echogr. (2015) 25(4):97102. 10.4103/2211-4122.172486

  • 42.

    Augustine DX Willis J Sivalokanathan S Wild C Sharma A Zaidi A et al Right ventricular assessment of the adolescent footballer’s heart. Echo Res Pract. (2024) 11(1):7. 10.1186/s44156-023-00039-4

  • 43.

    Teske AJ Prakken NHJ De Boeck BWL Velthuis BK Martens EP Doevendans PA et al Effect of long-term and intensive endurance training in athletes on the age-related decline in left and right ventricular diastolic function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. (2009) 104(8):114551. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.066

  • 44.

    Abhayaratna WP Seward JB Appleton CP Douglas PS Oh JK Tajik AJ et al Left atrial size: physiologic determinants and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2006) 47(12):235763. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.048

  • 45.

    Cabanelas N Freitas S Gonçalves L . Evolução das características morfofuncionais do coração do atleta durante uma época desportiva. Rev Port Cardiol. (2013) 32(4):2916. 10.1016/j.repc.2012.06.015

  • 46.

    Thompson PD . Cardiovascular adaptations to marathon running: the marathoner’s heart. Sports Med. (2007) 37(4):4447. 10.2165/00007256-200737040-00045

  • 47.

    Spyrou K Freitas TT Marín-Cascales E Alcaraz PE . Physical and physiological match-play demands and player characteristics in futsal: a systematic review. Front Psychol. (2020) 11:569897. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569897

  • 48.

    Kandels J Metze M Stöbe S Do L Möbius-Winkler MN Antoniadis M et al Long-term follow-up of professional soccer players: analyses of left and right heart morphology and function by conventional, three-dimensional, and deformation analyses. Diagnostics. (2025) 15(14):1745.

  • 49.

    Sjödin B Svedenhag J . Applied physiology of marathon running. Sports Med. (1985) 2(2):8399. 10.2165/00007256-198502020-00002

Summary

Keywords

futsal, cardiac remodeling, VO2max, left atrial volume, ventricular thickness, exercise physiology

Citation

Polito LFT, Carneiro YdM, Biaggioni DdF, Brolin Vieira Nascimento T, Prado DRd and Villas Boas Junior M (2025) The heart of the futsal athletes: a comparison of heart structure among under-18, under-20 and adult elite players. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 12:1710254. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1710254

Received

22 September 2025

Revised

17 November 2025

Accepted

19 November 2025

Published

12 December 2025

Volume

12 - 2025

Edited by

Daria Nurzynska, University of Salerno, Italy

Reviewed by

Abigail M. Saunders, Loughborough University, United Kingdom

Viktor Stoičkov, University of Niš, Serbia

Petra Radic, Sisters of Charity Hospital, Croatia

Updates

Copyright

* Correspondence: Luís Felipe Tubagi Polito

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics