CORRECTION article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1713150
Correction: A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial to Assess the Quality of Life and Patency Rate After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Design and Rationale of the MICS-CABG PRPP Trial
Provisionally accepted- Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
• Please read through all the templates before choosing • Pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others.• Edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • Please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • Submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used.The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated. Adding/removing text [At the inception of this RCT, the study was registered under the number NCT04795193. Due to adjustments in team responsibilities and unfamiliarity with clinical trial registration rules, a revised protocol was mistakenly submitted as a separate registration under NCT05104320. This registration number was then used during the submission of the protocol manuscript. Upon subsequent verification of the RCT, we discovered this inconsistency and intend to consolidate the information from both registration entries into the original registration under NCT04795193, while withdrawing the duplicate registration NCT05104320. We hereby request an update to the published manuscript to reflect the correct registration number. Specifically, we ask whether the registration number "NCT05104320" in the published article can be replaced with "NCT04795193.]. A correction has been made to the section [Materials and Methods, Paragraph 1]: "[This randomized patient preference trial had been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04795193. The trial has been reviewed and approved by Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee. Any modifications to the protocol will be agreed upon by the ethics committee. The researcher will obtain informed consent from eligible participants. The study center, the Department of Cardiac Surgery at Peking University Third Hospital, conducts an estimated 500 coronary artery bypass surgeries annually (MICS-CABG accounts for 60%). Inpatients from October 2021 to December 2023 will be selected for the eligibility evaluation process. The Patient flow diagram is displayed in Figure 1.]"
Keywords: MICS-CABG, SF-36 score, Minimally invasive, Patency rate, Patients' preference, Quality of Life, Surgical Procedures, Trial
Received: 25 Sep 2025; Accepted: 16 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ling, Gong, Wang, Li, Fu, Zheng, Zheng and Zhan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yunpeng Ling, micsling@pku.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.