Introduction
Agave within a sustainable circular bioeconomy goes beyond simply replacing fossil-based feedstocks with renewable biological resources. Instead, it requires sustainable supply chains, promising disruptive conversion technologies for sustainable transformation into biobased products, materials, and fuels (). A circular bioeconomy model aims to integrate the biological recovery of organic resources and nutrients from waste into a circular economy scheme (; DÃaz-Vázquez et al.). Agave is native to semiarid and arid regions of North and Central America and possesses several morphological, anatomical, and physiological drought resistance mechanisms, most notably crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). In contrast to C4 feedstocks, like sugarcane, switchgrass, and Miscanthus, which have a water-use efficiency (WUE) that limits them to areas with relatively high annual rainfall, Agave possesses remarkable heat tolerance and WUE (; ; ; ; ). Even in these extreme environments, and with few nitrogen (fertilizer) inputs, agave plants produce yields comparable to other second-generation bioenergy feedstocks (; ; ). Different Agave species have been cultivated historically throughout the world, and some varieties are currently being developed for expanded commercial production in Australia, Brazil, and Mexico, with increasing interest in the United States and several African countries.
Some of this growing interest is motivated by global climate changes that present challenges for agricultural production systems. Some Agave species are predicted to have increased biomass production in future climates on semi-arid, abandoned, marginal, or degraded agricultural lands (). The economic importance of Agave for fiber and spirits production (mainly in Brazil and Mexico) is clear, with 2.62 million tons of Agave tequilana produced in 2022 for Tequila () and other traditional mezcals now also internationally recognized and traded with Appellation of Origin status (). Interest in Agave research and applications continues to increase due to its predicted resilience to the impacts of climate change (). The predicted impacts of climate change are 62% lower for Agave than corn and 30% lower than sugarcane, which are two other primary bioenergy feedstocks. The ability for Agave to survive in marginal semi-arid landscapes reduces the impact on other agricultural production systems. This will become increasingly important with agricultural production under pressure from a changing climate and higher demands for agricultural commodities from an increasing population (Crawford et al.).
An overview of the articles published on this Research Topic
This Research Topic has featured five articles on
Agavewithin a circular bioeconomy. In the following, their main contributions are highlighted.
• Yeast community composition impacts on tequila industry waste treatment for pollution control and waste-to-product synthesis: This article assesses the treatment and revalorization potential of tequila vinasses (TV) using mono and mixed yeast cultures to produce single-cell protein (SCP) and to analyze yeast community composition using high-throughput sequencing during the mixed-culture fermentation of tequila vinasses. The evaluated yeasts (Candida utilis and Kluyveromyces marxianus) successfully employed TV as a growth medium with an estimated potential to produce 45,664 tons of protein feed yearly (DÃaz-Vázquez et al.).
• Optimal planting density of Agave for maximizing aboveground biomass: A systematic literature review: This paper aims to assess the available research on Agave species, which reports planting densities and yield, and then recommend an optimum planting density for greatest productivity from available research using meta-analysis. Based on the findings of , the hypothesized optimum density is 2,500–3,400 plants/hectare (ha) for Agave, which will equate to 21 Mg ha−1 y−1. The meta-analysis in this global systematic literature review revealed an optimum planting density of 2,600 plants/ha with a dry aboveground biomass yield of approximately 28.8 Mg ha−1 y−1 (Crawford et al.).
• Molecular epidemiology of sisal bole rot disease suggests a potential phytosanitary crisis in Brazilian production areas: In this study, the authors develop a more reliable and user-friendly molecular marker for accurate Aspergillus welwitschiae identification through the identification of exclusive regions within its genomes. After the marker validation, it was employed in Agave sisalana conducting an epidemiological investigation where a pathogen was found with an incidence of 78%–88%. In this regard, the dispersion index indicates a regular spatial pattern for disease distribution, suggesting that the use of contaminated suckers to establish new fields may be the main disease-spreading mechanism (Raya et al.).
• Analysis of protein-protein interaction and weighted co-expression networks revealed key modules and genes in multiple organs of Agave sisalana: In this manuscript, the authors predict 2582 interactome components in Agave sisalana using public transcriptome sequences generated from leaf, stem, and root tissues. In addition, the identification of key modules and their association with three different organs from co-expression analysis which play the role of abscission can be part of further improvement studies to accelerate or repress flowering (Carvalho et al.).
• Rescuing the Brazilian Agave breeding program: morphophysiological and molecular characterization of new germplasm: This manuscript reports the evaluation of 21 Agave accessions as potential breeding materials being grown in the field where a novel marker based on the Mayahuelin gene was employed and 34 morphophysiological traits were analyzed to acquire insights into the prevailing accessions in Brazil for selecting more productive and climate-resilient cultivars for biorenewables production (Raya et al.).
Statements
Author contributions
JP-P: Writing–original draft. HM-A: Writing–review and editing. SD: Writing–review and editing. DT: Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BorlandA. M.GriffithsH.HartwellJ.SmithJ. A. C. (2009). Exploiting the potential of plants with crassulacean acid metabolism for bioenergy production on marginal lands. J. Exp. Bot.60, 2879–2896. 10.1093/jxb/erp118
2
CRT (2023). Tequila regulatory council. Available at: https://www.crt.org.mx (Accessed July 28, 2023).
3
DavisS. C.AbatzoglouJ. T.LebauerD. S. (2021). Expanded potential growing region and yield increase for Agave americana with future climate. Agronomy11 (11), 2109. 10.3390/agronomy11112109
4
DavisS. C.KauneckisD.KruseN. A.MillerK. E.ZimmerM.DabelkoG. D. (2016). Closing the loop: integrative systems management of waste in food, energy, and water systems. J. Environ. Stud. Sci.6, 11–24. 10.1007/s13412-016-0370-0
5
DavisS. C.KuzmickE. R.NiechayevN.HunsakerD. J. (2017). Productivity and water use efficiency of Agave americana in the first field trial as bioenergy feedstock on arid lands. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy9, 314–325. 10.1111/gcbb.12324
6
DavisS. C.LeBauerD.LongS. (2014). Light to liquid fuel: theoretical and realized energy conversion efficiency of plants using Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) in arid conditions. J. Exp. Bot.65, 3471–3478. 10.1093/jxb/eru163
7
DavisS. C.Ortiz-CanoH. (2023). Lessons from the history of Agave: ecological and cultural context for valuation of CAM. Ann. Bot., mcad072. mcad072. 10.1093/aob/mcad072
8
JonesA. M.ZhouY.HeldM.DavisS. C. (2020). Tissue composition of Agave americana L. yields greater carbohydrates from enzymatic hydrolysis than advanced bioenergy crops. Front. Plant Sci.11, 654. article 654. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00654
9
LewisS. M.GrossS.ViselA.KellyM.y MorrowW. (2015). Fuzzy GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for US Agave production as a bioenergy feedstock. GCB Bioenergy7, 84–99. 10.1111/gcbb.12116
10
NobelP. S. (1998). Environmental biology of agaves and cacti. First. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
11
TanE. C. D.LamersP. (2021). Circular bioeconomy concepts—a perspective. Front. Sustain.2, 1–8. 10.3389/frsus.2021.701509
Summary
Keywords
agave, bioeconomy and circular economy, feedstocks, biorefinery, biofuels and bioproducts
Citation
Perez-Pimienta JA, Méndez-Acosta HO, Davis SC and Tan DKY (2024) Editorial: The role of agave as feedstock within a sustainable circular bioeconomy. Front. Chem. Eng. 5:1343629. doi: 10.3389/fceng.2023.1343629
Received
23 November 2023
Accepted
11 December 2023
Published
04 January 2024
Volume
5 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
J. Paul Chen, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Perez-Pimienta, Méndez-Acosta, Davis and Tan.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jose A. Perez-Pimienta, japerez@uan.edu.mx
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.