Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Clim.

Sec. Climate Mobility

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fclim.2025.1579299

Perspectives on climate change and adaptation in Fijian villages contemplating relocation

Provisionally accepted
Yuki  YoshidaYuki Yoshida1*Giles  B SioenGiles B Sioen2,3Gauna  MetuiselaGauna Metuisela4Richard  CrichtonRichard Crichton4,5
  • 1National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan
  • 2The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tōkyō, Japan
  • 3Future Earth Global Secretariat, Tokyo, Japan
  • 4Center for Sustainable Futures, University of the South Pacific, Laucala, Fiji
  • 5Division for Prosperity, United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), Hiroshima, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Planned relocation is increasingly recognized as a necessary response to escalating climate risks, yet little is known about how such decisions unfold at the community level. Drawing on dialogues and field visits at seven iTaukei villages across Fiji, this report examines how communities are experiencing and responding to climate-related challenges. Findings reveal cascading impactsincluding flooding, land loss, disrupted livelihoods, and psychological stress-that have prompted a range of adaptation strategies, from in-situ adjustments to full or partial relocation, with mixed outcomes. Despite growing pressures, most communities expressed a strong, culturally grounded preference to remain in place. Challenges in reaching consensus and securing funding reflect the complexity of relocation processes. Moreover, traditional governance structures do not always ensure equal participation, highlighting the importance of attending to intra-community dynamics. To minimize loss and damage while ensuring agency and resilience of frontline communities, climate mobility frameworks will need to support anticipatory planning, uphold community agency, and recognize immobility as a legitimate and often preferred option.

Keywords: Planned relocation, Loss and damage, Immobility, SIDS, Climate change impacts, managed retreat, governance, maladaptation

Received: 19 Feb 2025; Accepted: 22 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yoshida, Sioen, Metuisela and Crichton. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yuki Yoshida, National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.