ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Clim.
Sec. Predictions and Projections
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fclim.2025.1599405
Africa's regional and local climate response to stratospheric aerosol injection characteristics
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Atmospheric and Climate Science, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana
- 2NFS National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States
- 3Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
- 4African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- 5Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania
- 6Climate System Analysis Group (CSAG), Environmental and Geographical Science Department, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- 7Nansen-Tutu Centre for Marine Environmental Research, Department of Oceanography, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Future climate projections indicate that Africa will experience significant increases in both mean and extreme temperature indices. These changes will be accompanied by notable shifts in precipitation patterns under a high-emission scenario (RCP8.5). Using climate simulations, this study assesses the potential impact of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) on projected mean and extreme temperature and precipitation across the continent. We analysed data from the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) project, which simulates a set of SAI experiments under RCP8.5 emission scenarios with SO2 injection into the tropical stratosphere at 22.8-25 km altitude (GLENS) and around 1 km above the tropopause (GLENS_low) and near the equator at around 20-25 km above ground (GLENS_eq). The results show that all SAI experiments (GLENS, GLENS_eq, and GLENS_low) exhibit substantial cooling effects, with GLENS_eq emerging as the most effective in reducing temperature extremes, particularly over Central and Southern Africa. However, despite successfully offsetting much of the RCP8.5-induced warming, the effectiveness of SAI varies across regions, leaving some regions, such as the Sahel and North Africa, with residual warming. In addition to its cooling effects, SAI could significantly alter precipitation patterns, introducing widespread drying and thereby reducing flood risks across the continent. While SAI could offset the projected increase in extreme precipitation under RCP8.5, it could simultaneously exacerbate drying trends over Central, Southern, and Northern Africa. These findings highlight critical trade-offs associated with SAI deployment, particularly for regions where agriculture and water resources depend heavily on rainfall, underscoring the need for regionally optimised geoengineering strategies that balance temperature moderation with hydrological stability. This study provides the first comparative analysis of tropical, equatorial, and low-altitude SAI impacts on the climate, revealing critical trade-offs for precipitationdependent regions. The findings presented here are, however, specific to the SAI scenarios analysed (GLENS experiments), as a different SAI deployment scenario would lead to different conclusions.
Keywords: Climate Extremes, Climate Change, climate intervention, solar geoengineering, Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering, precipitation, temperature, climate model
Received: 24 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kumi, Mensah, Quagraine, Patel, Otu-Larbi, Prempeh, Nguvava, Nkemelang, Abiodun, Lennard, New and Odoulami. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Naomi Kumi, Department of Atmospheric and Climate Science, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana
Romaric C. Odoulami, African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.