- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
Optical interconnects are becoming a major bottleneck in scaling up future GPU racks and network switches within data centers. Although 200 Gb/s optical transceivers using PAM-4 modulation have been demonstrated, achieving higher data rates and energy efficiencies requires high-order coherent modulations like 16-QAM. Current coherent links rely on energy-intensive digital signal processing (DSP) for channel impairment compensation and carrier phase recovery (CPR), which consumes approximately 50 pJ/b, 10 times higher than future intra-data center requirements. For shorter links, simpler or DSP-free CPR methods can significantly reduce power and complexity. While Costas loops enable CPR for QPSK, they face challenges in scaling to higher-order modulations (e.g., 16/64-QAM) due to varying symbol amplitudes. In this work, we propose an optical coherent link architecture using laser forwarding and a novel DSP-free CPR system using offset-QAM modulation. The proposed analog CPR feedback loop is highly scalable, capable of supporting arbitrary offset-QAM modulations (e.g., 4, 16, 64) without requiring architectural modifications. This scalability is achieved through its phase error detection mechanism, which operates independently of the data rate and modulation type. We validated this method using GlobalFoundries monolithic 45 nm silicon photonics PDK models, with circuit- and system-level implementation at 100 GBaud in the O-band. We will investigate the feedback loop dynamics, circuit-level implementations, and phase-noise performance of the proposed CPR loop. Our method can be adopted to realize low-power QAM optical interconnects for future coherent-lite pluggable transceivers as well as co-packaged optics (CPO) applications.
1 Introduction
The rise of AI computing, driven by tens of thousands of GPUs and AI accelerators in data centers, poses significant challenges for optical interconnects and networking technologies (Naffziger, 2023; Xie and Zhang, 2022). Current state-of-the-art optical interconnects utilize pluggable transceivers operating at 112 Gb/s and 224 Gb/s PAM-4 data rates with energy efficiencies of
Coherent optical communication requires precise phase and frequency alignment between the received (Rx) signal and the local oscillator (LO). Long-haul coherent transceivers, such as the 800G-ZR/ZR + standards (Zhou et al., 2023), employ power-intensive digital signal processing (DSP) to handle channel impairments such as chromatic dispersion (CD), differential group delay (DGD), and carrier phase recovery (CPR) (Nagarajan et al., 2024; Ip et al., 2008). These DSP methods require oversampling ADCs, resulting in energy consumption around 50 pJ/b and increased system complexity. In short-reach interconnects (e.g., inter-rack links
Previous studies have demonstrated DSP-free CPR systems for QPSK/4-QAM modulations (Valenzuela et al., 2022; Movaghar et al., 2023; Ashok et al., 2021b; Ashok et al., 2021a) using Costas loops (Chul Park et al., 2012; Dick et al., 2000). These systems utilize optical phase-locked loops (OPLLs) (Valenzuela et al., 2022), optical delay-locked loops (ODLLs) (Movaghar et al., 2023), and traditional PLLs (Ashok et al., 2021b) for phase and frequency mismatches in laser-forwarded links. However, as modulation schemes scale to higher orders (e.g., 16/64/256-QAM), Costas loops fail to correct phase errors due to varying symbol amplitudes (Rezaei et al., 2024).
For instance, using unmodified Costas loops for 16-QAM introduces symbol-dependent phase error detection, creating false I/Q locking points that deviate from
Another work (Liu et al., 2024) employed the pilot tone concept by adding a low-frequency test tone to the transmitted optical signal. At the receiver, phase error is detected and compensated based on the power of this tone. However, even after compensation, this low-power tone remains in the signal, interfering with the data and causing periodic jitter, ultimately impacting BER.
In this work, we propose a DSP-free carrier phase recovery system optimized for offset-QAM modulation. Offset-QAM is generated by leaking a portion of the LO signal into the modulated QAM signal at the transmitter, as shown in Figure 1. This can be achieved using Mach-Zehnder Modulators (MZMs) operating with an offset from the transmission null (Lu et al., 2010), or, as recently demonstrated, by employing micro-ring modulators (MRMs) (Sturm and Moazeni, 2024). In offset-QAM, the phase offset between the Rx signal and LO paths is detected based on the average power/voltage difference between the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) signals. This difference serves as an error signal to correct the phase error using a phase shifter (PS) in the LO path for laser-forwarded links. The laser-forwarding technique (Mehta et al., 2020) forwards a portion of the transmitter (Tx) laser to the receiver to serve as the LO, maintaining zero frequency mismatch, eliminating the need for an additional LO laser, and mitigating laser phase noise (PN). This approach reduces cost and enhances reliability. The proposed CPR system supports any offset-QAM modulation level (e.g., 4, 16, 256) without architectural modifications, making it highly scalable for future high-order modulations. Unlike Costas loops, our method avoids the need for high-speed analog devices (e.g., mixers, XORs) and does not suffer from

Figure 1. The constellation of (a) 4-QAM (QPSK) (b) 4-offset-QAM modulation with and without the phase error between the Rx signal and LO paths. The offset-QAM format introduces an intentional offset affecting the constellation rotation in presence of phase error.
The proposed receiver is modeled and simulated using GlobalFoundries (GF) 45 nm monolithic silicon photonics (GF45SPCLO) (Rakowski et al., 2020) PDK models, with circuit/system-level implementation at 100 GBaud. This approach paves the way for low-power QAM interconnects in future co-packaged optics (CPO) and coherent-lite (Lam et al., 2021) applications, enabling energy-efficient data rates exceeding 400 Gb/s per channel.
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces our DSP-free CPR techniques for offset-QAM modulation. Section 3 analyzes loop dynamics, including stability and laser phase noise. Section 4 discusses the circuit implementation. Section 5 presents simulation results and trade-offs. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper.
2 Proposed DSP-Free carrier phase recovery
Optical coherent communication relies on precise frequency and phase locking between the received signal and the local oscillator. Any phase error
where

Figure 2. (a) Block diagrams of the proposed offset-QAM coherent receiver using (b) Method 1 and (c) Method 2 for LO phase recovery.
In Method 1, the outputs of the low-pass filters in the I and Q paths are subtracted, generating an error signal equal to
In Method 2,
While Method 1 avoids the
3 CPR loop dynamics
In this section, the CPR loop dynamics are analyzed in terms of stability, bandwidth, residual phase error, and phase noise performance.
In the transmitter, the electric field of the laser source can be expressed in Equation 3:
where

Figure 4. (a) The linear small-signal phase modeling of the CPR system (b) the simplified phase model after averaging.
Since
where
Figure 5 presents the Bode plot of the proposed CPR system, with parameters specified in Table 1. The system demonstrates a phase margin of
3.1 Residual phase error
The residual phase error can be determined from the phase error transfer function, given by
Replacing the parameters in 5 with the values given in Table 1 results in the static phase error equal to
3.2 Laser phase noise
The phase noise of a Lorentzian-shaped laser linewidth can be described as a random walk Wiener process with a power spectral density (PSD) of
where
The total phase noise power can be calculated from Equation 8:
Figure 6 shows the PSD of the beat signal’s phase noise for different CPR loop bandwidths. In this figure, the laser-forwarding technique shapes the laser phase noise depending on

Figure 6. Effect of laser forwarding technique and CPR loop bandwidth on the PSD of the beat signal phase noise (
As mentioned before, the phase noise of the beat signal can be represented as Gaussian noise with a mean of 0 and variance of
3.2.1 Impact of laser phase noise on BER in 4-offset-QAM
Figure 7a illustrates the constellation diagram of 4-Offset-QAM, where symbols rotate on circles with radius proportional to their symbol magnitude. The symbol error rate and bit error rate are in Equation 9 (Zhou et al., 2021):
where
where
where
As seen in this equation, depending on where the location of the center
where erfc(.) is the complementary error function defined in Equation 14:
The total conditional error probability due to the phase noise can be calculated from Equation 15 (Zhou et al., 2021):
where
With
For 4-offset-QAM, we have

Figure 8. Theoretical BER vs. SNR for 4- and 16-Offset-QAM for various offset-to-OMA ratio
Next, we examine the effect of the CPR loop bandwidth on the BER by calculating the BER versus the SNR for different loop bandwidth values for
We also studied the impact of laser linewidth on BER. DFB lasers typically exhibit linewidths in the range of 1–10 MHz (Zhou et al., 2021). As shown in Figure 10, as the linewidth increases from 100 kHz to 1 MHz, the required SNR penalty to achieve a BER of
Furthermore, we investigated the effect of length mismatch on BER. As illustrated in Figure 11, for a laser linewidth of 1 MHz, when the length mismatch exceeds 50 cm, the BER drops significantly. This highlights the importance of carefully managing the splitting of the laser output between the transmitter and local oscillator LO to ensure that the length mismatch remains within a few centimeters.

Figure 11. Theoretical BER vs. SNR for 4- and 16-Offset-QAM for various LO/Rx signal fiber length mismatch.
3.2.2 Effect of laser phase noise on BER for 16-offset-QAM
Next, we investigate the effect of laser phase noise on BER for 16-offset-QAM modulation, using a procedure analogous to that for 4-offset-QAM. Figure 7b presents the constellation diagram of 16-Offset-QAM, illustrating the symbol shifts caused by phase noise. The values of I and Q fall within the set
Similarly, we can determine the conditional error probability for the remaining symbols to calculate the total SER, and therefore, the BER. From Equation 16, we have
As shown in Figure 9, for a BER of
4 Coherent receiver circuit implementation
4.1 Offset-QAM transmitter modeling
The 4-offset-QAM transmitter was modeled using ideal spectre models supporting up to
4.2 Circuit implementation of offset-QAM CPR system
Figure 12 shows the block diagram of the coherent receiver that can be used for any levels of offset-QAM modulation. A detailed circuit implementation of the coherent receiver is provided below.
4.2.1 Optical front-end (OFE)
The local laser is forwarded from the transmitter side through an ideal fiber (channel impairments have not been included). A thermal phase shifter with a 2 kHz bandwidth in the LO path is used to adjust the LO phase via the CPR loop. At the receiver, the Rx and LO signals beat together in a
4.2.2 Carrier phase recovery system
In the carrier phase recovery block, the I and Q differential outputs are differenced in current mode using a subtractor, followed by a
To extract the average of the I and Q difference, a low-pass filter with a very low cutoff frequency is required. This is achieved using an active loop filter with high DC gain to guarantee zero remaining phase error between the LO and Rx signals. The loop filter consists of a differential operational amplifier (OpAmp) with
5 Simulation results
We have designed and simulated the proposed laser-forwarded carrier phase recovery system using GlobalFoundries monolithic 45 nm silicon photonics PDK models in Cadence. The parameter values used in this design are listed in Table 1. The baud rate is
To evaluate the functionality of the design, we performed closed-loop simulations for a phase offset of

Figure 13. Simulated eye-diagrams of the I and Q channels at the AFE input nodes, for a 100 GBaud offset-QAM receiver with an example phase offset of
Figure 13b presents the results for
In the presence of phase noise, to achieve the same performance as in the absence of phase noise, we must reduce the phase noise power. This can be achieved by using a laser with a narrower linewidth, minimizing the length mismatch between the Rx signal and LO paths, or increasing the effective CPR closed-loop bandwidth, which is mainly limited by the thermal phase shifter bandwidth in this process.
6 Conclusion
We have proposed, modeled, and simulated a DSP-free offset-QAM coherent receiver architecture that can perform CPR for any offset-QAM modulation level (e.g., 4, 16, 64) without architectural adjustments that can solve the scalability problem of previously proposed DSP-free CPR systems for QAM modulation. Combined with laser-forwarding, we believe this method can become a solution for future low power coherent links inside data centers. We used electro-optical spectre models in Cadence using the GF45SPCLO for simulation. Received eye-diagram operating at a baud rate of 100Gbaud at the PD outputs are measured for both 4- and 16-offset-QAM. Additionally, we studied the effects of laser linewidths, LO/Rx signal fiber length mismatch, and CPR loop bandwidth on BER. We have also elaborated on the circuit block implementation of key loop components.
Realistic link scenarios assuming 1 MHz laser linewidth and
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
MR: Investigation, Software, Writing – review and editing, Resources, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Validation, Visualization. DS: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. PZ: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. SM: Project administration, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work is supported by NSF CAREER (ECCS- 2142996), NSF ENG-SEMICON (ECCS-2430776) and SRC PKG Programs. The authors would like to thank GlobalFoundries for providing silicon fabrication and PDK through the 45SPCLO university partnership program.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ashok, R., Naaz, S., Kamran, R., and Gupta, S. (2021a). Analog domain carrier phase synchronization in coherent homodyne data center interconnects. J. Light. Technol. 39, 6204–6214. doi:10.1109/jlt.2021.3096605
Ashok, R., Nambath, N., and Gupta, S. (2021b). Carrier phase recovery and compensation in analog signal processing based coherent receivers. J. Light. Technol. 40, 2341–2347. doi:10.1109/jlt.2021.3135857
Chagnon, M., Lessard, S., and Plant, D. V. (2016). 336 Gb/s in direct detection below KP4 FEC threshold for intra data center applications. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 28, 2233–2236. doi:10.1109/LPT.2016.2590983
Chang, S. H., Chung, H. S., and Kim, K. (2009). Impact of quadrature imbalance in optical coherent qpsk receiver. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 21, 709–711. doi:10.1109/LPT.2009.2016759
Chul Park, H., Lu, M., Bloch, E., Reed, T., Griffith, Z., Johansson, L., et al. (2012). 40Gbit/s coherent optical receiver using a Costas loop. Opt. Express 20, B197–B203. doi:10.1364/OE.20.00B197
Dick, C., Harris, F., and Rice, M. (2000). “Synchronization in software radios. Carrier and timing recovery using FPGAs,” in Proceedings 2000 IEEE symposium on field-programmable custom computing machines (cat. No.PR00871), 195–204. doi:10.1109/FPGA.2000.903406
Ip, E., Lau, A. P. T., Barros, D. J. F., and Kahn, J. M. (2008). Coherent detection in optical fiber systems. Opt. Express 16, 753–791. doi:10.1364/OE.16.000753
Li, F., Li, Z., Sui, Q., Li, J., Yi, X., Li, L., et al. (2019). “200 Gbit/s (68.25 gbaud) PAM8 signal transmission and reception for intra-data center interconnect,” in Optical fiber communication conference (OFC) 2019 (Optica Publishing Group). W4I.3. doi:10.1364/OFC.2019.W4I.3
Liu, L., Xue, B., Yuan, P., Lu, W., Fang, Y., Liu, Z., et al. (2024). Dsp-free coherent detection for short-reach frequency-synchronous optical networks. J. Light. Technol. 42, 5128–5133. doi:10.1109/jlt.2024.3386700
Lu, G.-W., Sköld, M., Johannisson, P., Zhao, J., Sjödin, M., Sunnerud, H., et al. (2010). 40-Gbaud 16-QAM transmitter using tandem IQ modulators with binary driving electronic signals. Opt. Express 18, 23062–23069. doi:10.1364/OE.18.023062
Mehta, N., Lin, S., Yin, B., Moazeni, S., and Stojanović, V. (2020). A laser-forwarded coherent transceiver in 45-nm SOI CMOS using monolithic microring resonators. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 55, 1096–1107. doi:10.1109/JSSC.2020.2968764
Mizutori, A., Abe, T., Kodama, T., and Koga, M. (2017). “Optical 16-qam signal homodyne detection by extracting+/-π/4 and+/-3π/4-phase symbols,” in 2017 optical fiber communications conference and exhibition (OFC) (IEEE), 1–3.
Movaghar, G., Arrunategui, V., Liu, J., Maharry, A., Schow, C., and Buckwalter, J. (2023). “A 112-gbps, 0.73-pJ/bit fully-integrated O-band IQ optical receiver in a 45-nm CMOS SOI-photonic process,” in 2023 IEEE radio frequency integrated circuits symposium (RFIC) (IEEE), 5–8.
Naffziger, S. (2023). “Innovations for energy efficient generative AI,” in 2023 international electron devices meeting (IEDM), 1–4. doi:10.1109/IEDM45741.2023.10413684
Nagarajan, R., Lyubomirsky, I., and Agazzi, O. (2021). Low power dsp-based transceivers for data center optical fiber communications (invited tutorial). J. Light. Technol. 39, 5221–5231. doi:10.1109/JLT.2021.3089901
Nagarajan, R., Martino, A., Morero, D. A., Patra, L., Lutkemeyer, C., and Castrillón, M. A. (2024). Recent advances in low-power digital signal processing technologies for data center applications. J. Light. Technol. 42, 4222–4232. doi:10.1109/JLT.2024.3399032
Patil, Y., Sharma, A., Nambath, N., and Gupta, S. (2016). “Analog processing-based coherent optical receiver for 16-qam signals with 12.5 gbd baud rate,” in 2016 twenty second national conference on communication (NCC) (IEEE), 1–6.
Rakowski, M., Meagher, C., Nummy, K. A., Aboketaf, A. A., Ayala, J., Bian, Y., et al. (2020). “45nm CMOS - silicon Photonics Monolithic Technology (45CLO) for next-generation, low power and high speed optical interconnects,” in Optical fiber communication conference (OFC) 2020 (Optica Publishing Group). doi:10.1364/OFC.2020.T3H.3
Rezaei, M., Sturm, D., Zeng, P., and Moazeni, S. (2024). “Dsp-free carrier phase recovery system for laser-forwarded offset-qam coherent optical receivers,” in 2024 IEEE 67th international midwest symposium on circuits and systems (MWSCAS) (IEEE), 1158–1161.
Sadchenko, A., and Kushnirenko, O. (2018). QPSK-modulation modem invariant to the rotation of the signal constellation plane. Electr. Control Commun. Eng. 14, 149–156. doi:10.2478/ecce-2018-0018
Saleh, A. A. M., Schmidtke, K. E., Stone, R. J., Buckwalter, J. F., Coldren, L. A., and Schow, C. L. (2021). INTREPID program: technology and architecture for next-generation, energy-efficient, hyper-scale data centers [Invited]. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 13, 347–359. doi:10.1364/JOCN.437858
Sturm, D., and Moazeni, S. (2024). “Compact and thermally-robust offset-qam optical transmitters using ramzi modulators,” in 2024 IEEE photonics society summer topicals meeting series (SUM), 1–2. doi:10.1109/SUM60964.2024.10614516
Valenzuela, L. A., Xia, Y., Maharry, A., Andrade, H., Schow, C. L., and Buckwalter, J. F. (2022). A 50-GBaud QPSK optical receiver with a phase/frequency detector for energy-efficient intra-data center interconnects. IEEE Open J. Solid-State Circuits Soc. 2, 50–60. doi:10.1109/ojsscs.2022.3150291
Xiao, M., and Cheng, T. (2006). “Improved implementation of Costas loop for DQPSK receivers using FPGA,” in 2006 international conference on communication technology, 1–4. doi:10.1109/ICCT.2006.341683
Xie, C., and Zhang, B. (2022). Scaling optical interconnects for hyperscale data center networks. Proc. IEEE 110, 1699–1713. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2022.3178977
Zhou, X. (2025). “Im-dd vs. coherent in datacenters: a revisit in 2025,” in 2025 optical fiber communications conference and exhibition (OFC), 1–28.
Zhou, X., Gao, Y., Huo, J., and Shieh, W. (2021). Theoretical analysis of phase noise induced by laser linewidth and mismatch length in self-homodyne coherent systems. J. Light. Technol. 39, 1312–1321. doi:10.1109/jlt.2020.3038213
Keywords: intra-data center interconnect, coherent communications, optical transmitter, optical receiver, analog signal processing, 16-QAM, offset-QAM, carrier phase recovery
Citation: Rezaei M, Sturm D, Zeng P and Moazeni S (2025) A DSP-free carrier phase recovery system using 16-offset-QAM laser forwarded links for 400 Gb/s and beyond. Front. Commun. Netw. 6:1642672. doi: 10.3389/frcmn.2025.1642672
Received: 06 June 2025; Accepted: 01 September 2025;
Published: 19 September 2025.
Edited by:
Giampiero Contestabile, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, ItalyReviewed by:
Pantea Nadimi Goki, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, ItalyKen Mishina, Osaka University, Japan
Copyright © 2025 Rezaei, Sturm, Zeng and Moazeni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Marziyeh Rezaei, bWFyeml5ZWhAdXcuZWR1