Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Dent. Med., 15 September 2025

Sec. Dental Materials

Volume 6 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2025.1633158

This article is part of the Research TopicDental Biomaterials: Addressing Modern Challenges and Shaping Future ProceduresView all 4 articles

Mineralization, anti-demineralization, and antibacterial effects of novel Bioactive Universal Bond with calcium salt monomers on dental caries


Bayarchimeg Altankhishig&#x;Bayarchimeg AltankhishigYasuhiro Matsuda&#x;Yasuhiro MatsudaYaxin RaoYaxin RaoTakashi Saito

Takashi Saito*
  • Division of Clinical Cariology and Endodontology, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Tobetsu, Japan

This study investigated the mineralization, anti-demineralization, and antibacterial properties of a novel bioactive universal adhesive containing the calcium salt of 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate acid (CMET). Four adhesives were evaluated: Bioactive Universal Bond with CMET (BA), Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CU), Prime & Bond Universal (PB), and Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive (SUB). To assess mineralization properties, BA specimens were immersed in simulated body fluid (SBF) at 37°C, in line with ISO 23317, and the induced crystals were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. Anti-demineralization was evaluated by applying each adhesive to polished bovine dentin, followed by a one-week pH cycling protocol. Transverse microradiography (TMR) was used to quantify the integrated mineral loss. The antibacterial activity was assessed using eluates prepared by immersing the cured specimens in distilled water for seven days, followed by serial dilutions (10%, 5%, 1%, and 0.5%). These eluates were incubated with Streptococcus mutans, Actinomyces viscosus, and Lactobacillus casei for 24 h at 37°C. Viable bacterial counts were determined using the quantitative polymerase chain reaction following propidium monoazide treatment. BA exhibited distinct mineralization in SBF, likely attributable to CMET, and was characterized by the formation of octacalcium-phosphate-like crystals. TMR analysis showed that BA significantly suppressed demineralization at the dentin–material interface in relation to the other adhesives. In antibacterial assays, 5% and 10% BA eluates markedly suppressed the growth of S. mutans and A. viscosus, whereas CU, PB, and SUB exhibited inhibitory effects at only 10% concentration for S. mutans and had no impact on A. viscosus. Notably, only the 10% BA eluate significantly inhibited L. casei growth. Despite the limitations of the in vitro experiments, these findings suggest that BA possesses multifunctional properties, supporting its potential as an effective adhesive system for the prevention and treatment of caries. Furthermore, its demonstrated bioactivity suggests promising applications across various biomedical fields, such as antibacterial coatings for medical devices, bone-regenerative scaffolds, and bioactive interfaces in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

1 Introduction

As a prevalent global health concern, dental caries is characterized by the demineralization of tooth structures due to the acidic byproducts of bacterial metabolism (1, 2). Maintaining a dynamic balance between demineralization and remineralization is crucial for preserving dental health (3). Therefore, effective management of both cariogenic bacteria and demineralized tooth substrates is essential for dental restoration and caries prevention (4).

For many years, research and development of adhesive materials for caries treatment have primarily focused on enhancing adhesive performance. However, contemporary adhesive dentistry has shifted attention toward the development of bioactive materials with remineralizing and antibacterial properties. These materials aim to prevent the recurrence of caries at the tooth–resin interface and the consequent failure of resin restorations (5, 6). Bioactive compounds and molecules have been incorporated into adhesive materials, including remineralizing agents such as hydroxyapatite, calcium silicates, bioactive glasses, and calcium phosphates, as well as antibacterial agents such as chlorhexidine, cetylpyridinium chloride, silver nanoparticles, and antimicrobial monomer 12-methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) (714). However, the destruction of the tooth structure caused by dental caries is a result of complex processes (1, 2). The development of multifunctional bioactive materials exhibiting remineralizing, antibacterial, and odontoblast-differentiating properties, while simultaneously maintaining favorable mechanical characteristics is crucial for preserving healthy tooth structures and promoting reconstruction and regeneration following carious lesions.

4-Methacryloxyethyl trimellitic acid (4-MET) is an acidic adhesive monomer widely used in dental materials. Its incorporation has been demonstrated to enhance adhesion to both enamel and dentin (15). Moreover, 4-MET is frequently combined with methyl methacrylate (MMA) in a formulation known as the 4-META/MMA-TBB adhesive (16). Previous studies have demonstrated that 4-MET forms ionic bonds with calcium in hydroxyapatite. Additionally, it induces lower dentin demineralization than other acidic monomers, allowing functional monomers to achieve strong chemical bonding with dentin and providing an effective seal against microleakage (15).

We developed a novel bioactive resin monomer, CMET, which is the calcium salt of 4-MET, as illustrated in Figure 1. The acidity of the molecule was modified by substituting calcium ions for hydrogen ions in the two carboxyl groups of 4-MET. This structural change is expected to enhance functionality, suggesting potential advantages for various dental applications and opening new directions for research (17).

Figure 1
The chemical structure of calcium salt of 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate acid (CMET). The molecule features a benzene ring linked to an ester group and two carboxylate groups with calcium ions (Ca²⁺) replacing hydrogen. This substitution modifies the monomer's acidity, potentially enhancing bioactive functionality. The divalent calcium ions balance the negative charges on the molecule, facilitating ionic interactions with hydroxyapatite in tooth structures. This structural modification is intended to confer mineral-inducing, anti-demineralization, and antibacterial properties when incorporated into dental adhesive systems, as investigated in this study. The diagram serves as a basis for understanding CMET's functionality.

Figure 1. Chemical structure of CMET.

Our previous studies demonstrated that CMET promotes mineral deposition in metastable solutions and exhibits antibacterial activity against several cariogenic bacterial species in vitro (17, 18). Furthermore, CMET facilitates the proliferation, odontoblastic differentiation, and mineralization of MDPC-23 cells in vitro, and has been shown to induce dentin regeneration when applied to exposed dental pulp tissue in a rat model simulating vital pulp therapy (19). Based on these findings, we defined CMET as a multifunctional bioactive monomer with the potential for dentin repair and regeneration, and we developed a novel universal adhesive incorporating it. In a recent study, we demonstrated that the CMET-containing universal adhesive exhibited favorable biocompatibility, including low cytotoxicity and the ability to promote odontoblastic differentiation in vitro (20). These findings indicate that the adhesive not only possesses bioactive functions but is also safe for biological applications.

This study aimed to evaluate the mineralization-inducing and anti-demineralization effects of a CMET-containing universal adhesive on bovine dentin as well as its antibacterial activity against three representative cariogenic bacterial species in comparison with commercially available universal adhesives.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Mineral induction

To prepare cured specimens for use in the crystal-forming ability test, the solvent component (20% ± 2%) of the Bioactive Universal Bond containing CMET (BA, Sun Medical, Moriyama, Shiga, Japan) was volatilized and mixed with the BA brush in a ratio of two drops of bonding agent to one brush. The resulting mixture was poured into a Teflon mold (φ10 ± 1 mm × 2 ± 1 mm), placed on a glass plate covered with cellophane, and secured with a clip. Light curing was performed using a PenCure 2000 unit (J. Morita Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at an intensity of 1,000 mW/cm2. The specimen was irradiated for 20 s from both the top of the mold and the glass plate beneath it.

Following curing, the specimen was removed from the mold and immersed in 22 ml of simulated body fluid (SBF) prepared in accordance with ISO 23317 (21), contained in a 50 ml tube, and incubated at 37°C. During immersion, the surface that was not in contact with the cellophane (i.e., the observation surface) was oriented downward. After four weeks, the specimen was retrieved from the SBF, rinsed with purified water, and air-dried with the observation surface facing up at room temperature (25°C) without heating.

The crystals on the specimen surfaces were photographed through field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; JSM-6701F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Elemental analysis of the crystals was conducted using scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS; JSM-IT200, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Prior to the analysis, the specimens were sputter-coated with a thin layer of platinum. The SEM/EDS analysis was performed under the following conditions: an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and a working distance of approximately 10 mm. The elemental composition was determined by point analysis of the mineralized regions. The Ca/P molar ratio was calculated from three randomly selected areas per specimen. The induced crystals were characterized based on their morphologies and Ca/P ratios.

2.2 Automatic pH cycling

Freshly extracted noncarious bovine incisors were purchased from Hokkaido Livestock Corporation CO., LTD. (Obihiro, Japan). The bovine teeth were polished with a 1,000 grit silicon carbide paper to expose the dentin surface under running water. The teeth were then cut by a low-speed diamond saw (Isomet, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) into longitudinal section widths of 150 µm to collect four single sections, and the cut surfaces were covered with sticky wax (Envista, Tokyo, Japan), except for the polished part.

Four different materials were prepared for this study: BA, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (CU) (Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tainai, Niigata, Japan), Prime & Bond universal (PB) (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA), and Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive (SUB) (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), as listed in Table 1. BA was mixed with a BA brush at a ratio of two drops of bonding agent to one brush and applied to the polished dentin surface. After volatilization of the solvent, light curing was performed using a PenCure 2000 unit at an intensity of 1,000 mW/cm2 for 5 s. The remaining three materials were partially applied to the polished surface in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Figure 2). All the specimens were placed in separate beakers for further analysis.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Chemical formulations of the bonding agents.

Figure 2
This schematic diagram illustrating the experimental protocol for assessing anti-demineralization effects. Polished bovine dentin specimens were prepared using 1000-grit abrasive paper and sectioned longitudinally into 150 μm slices. Non-test surfaces were sealed with sticky wax, and four types of adhesives—BA, CU, PB, and SUB—were applied to the exposed dentin according to respective protocols. The specimens underwent an automated pH-cycling regimen for one week, simulating cariogenic challenges with alternating demineralizing and remineralizing solutions. After cycling, transverse microradiography (TMR) was performed. The figure provides a clear step-by-step representation, from specimen preparation through pH cycling, to subsequent mineral loss analysis, enabling reproducibility of the method.

Figure 2. Experimental procedure for anti-demineralization analysis.

An automatic pH cycling system was used according to the previous study conducted by Matsuda et al. (22). The demineralizing solution (pH 4.5), which consisted of 0.2 M Lactic acid, 3.0 mM CaCl2, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4, was injected into the beaker for 2 min. The remineralizing solution (pH 6.8), a mixture of 0.02 M 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 3.0 mM CaCl2, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4, was gradually pumped in for 58 min. This process was repeated six times per day from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. for one week (Figure 3).

Figure 3
The automated pH-cycling patterns and solution compositions used to simulate daily cariogenic challenges. The upper panel shows six cycles per day, from 8:00 to 23:00, with pH dropping sharply to ∼4.5 for demineralization, followed by a rise to 6.5-6.8 for remineralization. The lower panel details a single 105-minute cycle, comprising 38.3 minutes at low pH. A table lists solution formulations: demineralizing solution (pH 4.5) with lactic acid, CaCl₂, and KH₂PO₄; remineralizing solution (pH 6.8) with HEPES buffer, CaCl₂, and KH₂PO₄. This model closely mimics oral pH fluctuations, providing a controlled environment for evaluating dentin mineral changes under acid challenge.

Figure 3. Daily pH cycling patterns and compositions of the demineralizing and remineralizing solutions.

2.3 Transverse microradiography imaging

Transverse microradiography (TMR) images were obtained to estimate the demineralization rate using a soft x-ray system (CSM-2; Softex Corp, Yokohama, Japan). Exposure was carried out for 20 min at 14 kV and 4 mA, with a focus-specimen distance of 44 mm, using an aluminum step wedge and high-resolution photo plates (HRP-SN-2, Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The digitization was performed using a microscope camera (PCM-500, As One, Tokyo, Japan) connected to an optical microscope (BX50, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Digitalized images before and after the pH cycling were superimposed using the image editing software (Adobe Photoshop Elements); furthermore, the area from the edge of the materials, a width of 50 μm, toward the depth was extracted as the analysis area. The degree of darkening of the TMR images before and after the pH cycle was analyzed using a general-purpose image analysis software (Image J, Bethesda, MD, USA). The obtained blackness was used to calculate the mineral profiles of the samples using the analysis program (23), and the integrated mineral loss (ΔIML) (Vol% × µm) was calculated (n = 5).

2.4 Antibacterial effect test

The test was conducted using Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) (JCM 5705), Actinomyces viscosus (A. viscosus) (JCM1134), and Lactobacillus casei (L. casei) (JCM8353) strains. Each bacterial streak was spread on a brain heart infusion (BHI; Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) agar plate and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 h. A single colony was picked from the plate, suspended in 10 ml of BHI broth, and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Suspensions were centrifuged (40 rpm, 15 min at 4°C) and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) several times, and bacterial (OD1) absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 600 nm.

Four different one-step adhesive bonds were used to create hardened discs in a silicone mold. The discs were immersed in 20 ml of distilled water and incubated in a 37°C water bath for one week. The supernatant of each adhesive was collected and diluted to 10, 5, 1, and 0, 5%. The samples were then aliquoted with bacterial suspension in 96-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After the incubation, all the samples were treated with propidium monoazide (PMA; Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA) and tested using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR, LightCycler96, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) (n = 5).

2.5 Statistical analyses

All results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Prior to conducting ANOVA, the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene's test, respectively.

3 Results

3.1 Mineral induction effect

After the cured disk was immersed in the SBF for 21 d, it was dried, and the crystals deposited on the surface were observed through SEM. As a result, spherical crystal aggregations of φ8–40 µm were dotted over the entire surface of the cured disk. As the crystals grew, several aggregates were observed to merge, indicating a process in which small aggregations combined to form larger structures (Figure 4A). The spherical crystal aggregates were composed of minute plates (Figure 4B). Furthermore, the plate-like crystals were continuously connected, and the structure also formed a space of approximately 100 nm. EDS analysis showed that the Ca/P molar ratio of the crystals induced on the cured disk of the BA was 1.35 ± 0.13 (Figure 5; Table 2).

Figure 4
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show crystals formed on BA adhesive disks after 21 days' immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF). Panel A, at ×1500 magnification, reveals spherical crystal aggregates distributed across the surface. Panel B, at ×10000 magnification, depicts the fine plate-like substructures composing each aggregate, with interconnected platelets creating ∼100 nm spaces. These morphological features suggest the formation of octacalcium phosphate-like crystals, a precursor to hydroxyapatite. The images highlight the adhesive's mineral-inducing capability, attributable to CMET's role as a nucleation site for calcium phosphate crystallization, supporting its potential for promoting remineralization at tooth-material interfaces in dental applications.

Figure 4. SEM images showing the morphology of the crystals formed on the surface of the cured BA disk after 21 d of immersion in SBF. (A) Spherical crystal aggregates (B) composed of thin, minute plate-like crystals were evident.

Figure 5
The SEM imaging and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to analyze the elemental composition of crystals on BA surfaces after SBF immersion. Panel A shows a crystal aggregate with a highlighted spectrum analysis area. Panel B presents the EDS spectrum, identifying peaks for oxygen, calcium, sodium, magnesium, and phosphorus, consistent with calcium phosphate mineral phases. The measured Ca/P molar ratio of ∼1.35 corresponds to octacalcium phosphate, a metastable precursor to hydroxyapatite. This elemental analysis corroborates the morphological evidence in Figure 4, confirming that BA's CMET component promotes biologically relevant mineral phases under physiological-like conditions.

Figure 5. SEM-EDX analysis. (A) SEM images of crystal formation. Spectrum 1 shows the area of the SEM-EDS analysis. (B) SEM-EDX analysis of Spectrum 1 in (A).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Elemental compositions (atom %) of the specimen surface precipitates detected with EDS analysis.

3.2 Anti-demineralization effect

Figure 6A shows the TMR images of the dentin demineralization rates for the four different adhesive materials. To analyze the mineral loss from the edge of the applied material, an area with a width of 50 μm and depth of 200 μm was extracted (Figure 6B). The demineralization rate results showed that dentin with BA had significantly lower ΔIML than that with other three adhesives (p< 0.05) (Figure 7).

Figure 6
Grayscale TMR images illustrating dentin demineralization patterns after one week of cariogenic pH cycling. Panel A shows representative sections for each adhesive group-BA, CU, PB, and SUB-where darkened regions indicate mineral loss. BA-treated specimens display notably lighter zones adjacent to the adhesive interface, indicating reduced demineralization. Panel B highlights the standardized analysis area (50 μm × 200 μm) used for quantifying integrated mineral loss (ΔIML). Arrows identify critical demineralized zones.

Figure 6. TMR image of the demineralized dentin exposed to various adhesives after 1 week of cariogenic pH cycling. (A) Dark areas represented by arrows indicate mineral loss. (B) Area (red square) used for calculating the mineral loss. BA, Bioactive Universal Bond; CU, Clearfil Universal Bond; PB, Prime & Bond Universal; SUB, Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive.

Figure 7
The integrated mineral loss (ΔIML) after one week of cariogenic pH cycling for dentin treated with BA, CU, PB, or SUB adhesives. BA exhibits significantly lower ΔIML values (∼1000) than the other groups (∼2000), indicating enhanced protection against demineralization. Bars are annotated with different letters to denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test). These results align with qualitative TMR images (Figure 6), confirming that BA's CMET-containing formulation effectively inhibits mineral loss under acidic challenge, outperforming the tested commercial adhesives in preserving dentin mineral integrity.

Figure 7. Change in the mineral loss (ΔIML) after 1 week of cariogenic pH cycling. Different letters indicate a significant difference in the mineral loss observed for the different adhesives (n = 5, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests, p < 0.05).

3.3 Antibacterial effect test

The antibacterial efficacy of the adhesives was tested using the PMA-qPCR method. The results showed that both 10% and 5% BA significantly inhibited the growth of S. mutans in relation to the control group (p < 0.05). In contrast, among the CU, PB, and SUB groups, only 10% concentration demonstrated a statistically significant effect (Figure 8A). For A. viscosus, a similar pattern was observed: 10% and 5% BA significantly suppressed bacterial growth, whereas only 10% concentration of CU, PB, and SUB induced a comparable inhibitory effect (Figure 8B). In the case of L. casei, significant inhibition was observed exclusively for the 10% BA group (Figure 8C).

Figure 8
The antibacterial activity of adhesives against Streptococcus mutans (A), Actinomyces viscosus (B), and Lactobacillus casei (C) using PMA-qPCR quantification of viable cells. Lower relative fluorescence units (RFU) indicate greater antibacterial effect. For S. mutans and A. viscosus, BA at 10% and 5% concentrations significantly reduced RFU compared with controls; other adhesives showed significant inhibition only at 10%. Against L. casei, only 10% BA produced a significant effect. Controls consistently exhibited the highest RFU. These findings demonstrate BA's concentration-dependent antibacterial efficacy, surpassing that of CU, PB, and SUB, particularly for multiple cariogenic species.

Figure 8. Antibacterial effects of the adhesives on S. mutans (A), A. viscosus, (B) and L. casei (C) Different letters indicate a significant difference in the antibacterial effects induced by the different adhesives (n = 5, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests, p< 0.05).

4 Discussion

CMET was initially developed because of its mineral-inducing potential (18). Subsequent studies have revealed that CMET also exhibits antibacterial activity and promotes odontoblastic differentiation (18, 19). On the basis of these findings, a novel bioactive adhesive material, BA Bond, was developed by incorporating CMET as a functional monomer.

Owing to its mineral-inducing ability, CMET facilitated the formation of mineral crystals on BA bond discs incubated in SBF, prepared according to ISO 23317. CMET has been shown to induce mineral deposition in a metastable calcium phosphate solution that did not spontaneously precipitate in vitro. It also significantly reduces the mineralization time of the decalcified dentin model when co-incubated. X-ray diffraction confirmed that the crystals formed by CMET were apatite (17).

Within the dentin matrix, phosphorylated proteins, such as phosphophoryn, play crucial roles in collagen mineralization and contribute to the structural integrity of dentin (24). Previous research has indicated that CMET-induced apatite formation mimics the process facilitated by phosphophoryn (17). In this study, the BA demonstrated results consistent with those reported previously for CMET. Microstructural analysis via SEM/EDS revealed that the crystals formed on the BA bond surface exhibited a plate-like morphology with a Ca/P ratio of 1.35, corresponding to that of octacalcium phosphate (OCP), a known precursor of hydroxyapatite (Ca/P molar ratio of 1.67) that transitions to its stable form under physiological conditions. Minor discrepancies in the EDS-derived compositions may result from instrumental variations or methodological differences (25). In this study, data were averaged from triplicate measurements per sample. These findings suggest that BA bonds promote the formation of OCP-like crystals in vitro owing to the ability of CMET to act as a nucleation agent for crystal formation.

This study also provides compelling evidence that CMET exerts significant anti-demineralization effects on dentin under pH cycling conditions. This model closely simulates the oral environment, which is characterized by alternating acidic and neutral periods conducive to remineralization (26). This study employed a newly designed automatic pH cycling system to simulate representative daily pH fluctuations (22, 23). The findings of this study are consistent with those reported previously, demonstrating the capacity of calcium- and phosphate-releasing materials, including bioactive glass and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), to enhance remineralization and dentinal tubules occlusion (2729). Our results support the hypothesis that CMET not only protects the dentin matrix against acid-induced demineralization but also facilitates surface remineralization. The anti-demineralization mechanism of CMET is likely multifactorial. First, the release of calcium ions from CMET may shift the local ionic environment to favor remineralization, because supersaturation with calcium and phosphate ions is essential for hydroxyapatite reprecipitation. Second, the carboxylic acid groups in CMET can chelate calcium ions and serve as nucleation sites for the formation of apatite-like crystals. This interaction between CMET and hydroxyapatite may enhance dentin resistance to acid attack.

PMA-qPCR is a quantitative polymerase chain reaction technique that employs PMA to selectively inhibit DNA amplification from dead cells, thereby enabling the specific detection and quantification of DNA derived from viable cells (30). Using this method, the antibacterial properties of the BA were assessed using three representative cariogenic bacteria. S. mutans, a key pathogen in dental caries, can adhere to tooth surfaces, metabolize sugars, produce acids, and thrive in acidic environments. It forms glucan-based biofilms that facilitate colonization (31). A. viscosus, a gram-positive bacterium, adheres to tooth surfaces and ferments carbohydrates to produce acids. It also binds strongly to collagen on root surfaces and has been implicated in root caries development (32, 33). L. casei, frequently isolated from active carious lesions, does not efficiently adhere to tooth surfaces alone but can co-adhere with S. mutans (34). In this study, the BA bond exhibited potent concentration-dependent antibacterial effects. Previous studies have demonstrated the antibacterial efficacy of functional monomers, such as MDPB; however, these monomers lack mineralizing properties (35). In contrast, CMET offers multiple beneficial effects, as indicated by the results obtained in this study. The results suggest that the antimicrobial effects of CMET may derive from both its acidic monomer structure and calcium ion release, which can influence bacterial morphology and growth dynamics. To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms underlying the mineralization and antibacterial effects of CMET, future studies will aim to analyze calcium ion release kinetics, resin–dentin interactions at the molecular level, and changes in surface energy that may influence bacterial adhesion and mineral nucleation.

Although the findings reported here are promising, several limitations of the present study should be acknowledged. First, all experiments were conducted in vitro, which may not fully replicate the complex conditions of the oral cavity. Second, the small sample size for each experimental group may affect the statistical robustness of the results. Third, although the results confirm the antibacterial efficacy of BA against selected species, its full-spectrum antimicrobial profile and long-term durability remain to be investigated. Future studies should test the antibacterial efficacy of BA using dynamic oral biofilm models, long-term aging protocols, and clinical conditions to confirm its therapeutic potential in dentistry. In this study, the antibacterial activity of the adhesives was assessed using eluates prepared from cured specimens. However, we acknowledge that this method does not fully replicate the complex and dynamic conditions of the oral environment, where direct and prolonged contact between the material and biofilms occurs. Future studies should incorporate additional antibacterial assessment methods, such as direct contact tests, agar diffusion tests, or multispecies biofilm models, which more closely mimic clinical conditions and could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the antibacterial performance of the material in situ.

Despite these limitations, this study highlights the potential of CMET as a multifunctional component for adhesive systems. Other bioactive materials, such as bioactive glass, CPP-ACP, and calcium-silicate-based cements, have shown similar remineralizing effects (2729, 36). However, only a few of these offer the combination of adhesion performance, remineralizing/anti-demineralization activities, and antibacterial functionalities within a single monomeric system. Recent studies have shown that the bond strength of CMET-based adhesives is comparable to that of conventional universal adhesives (37). Further studies are necessary to assess the mechanical and adhesive properties of the material. Comprehensive evaluation of bond strength, marginal integrity, and clinical performance will be essential to support the potential clinical application of this multifunctional adhesive. Regarding biosafety, a previous study by our group confirmed the biocompatibility of the CMET-containing universal adhesive, demonstrating minimal cytotoxicity and positive cellular responses in vitro, including odontoblast-like differentiation of pulp-derived cells (20). These findings support the material's potential for safe clinical use. However, additional studies involving long-term exposure and in vivo conditions are warranted to further validate its safety profile.

In this study, we developed a novel universal adhesive containing the bioactive monomer CMET, which exhibited multiple beneficial effects in vitro, including mineral induction, anti-demineralization, and antibacterial activity. These findings suggest that CMET may also enhance the performance of other dental materials such as liners, bases, and sealants.

5 Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the application of a novel bioactive universal adhesive containing CMET-BA to bovine dentin effectively induced mineralization and inhibited demineralization. Furthermore, BA exhibited pronounced antibacterial activity against S. mutans, A. viscosus, and L. casei in a concentration-dependent manner. These findings highlight the potential of BA as a promising candidate for the development of next-generation multifunctional dental materials with enhanced remineralization capacity, resistance to demineralization, and broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties. However, the present study is limited to in vitro experiments. Further investigations involving animal models and clinical trials are necessary to validate the results obtained in this study and to optimize CMET-based formulations for clinical applications. In addition to clinical dentistry, the multifunctional properties of CMET-based adhesives make them suitable for a broader range of biomedical and industrial applications such as antibacterial coatings for medical devices, mineralization-promoting scaffolds in bone tissue engineering, and bioactive interfaces in regenerative medicine.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

BA: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YR: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant numbers 24K02628 and 24K12951).

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical support provided by Sun Medical (Moriyama, Shiga, Japan).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet. (2007) 369(9555):51–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Zero DT. Dental caries process. Dent Clin North Am. (1999) 43(4):635–64. doi: 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00818-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Featherstone JDB. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J. (2008) 53(3):286–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00064.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2017) 3:17030. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.30

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent Res. (2008) 87(8):710–9. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700802

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJM. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. (2012) 28(1):87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Zhang K, Zhang N, Weir MD, Reynolds MA, Bai Y, Xu HHK. Bioactive dental composites and bonding agents having remineralizing and antibacterial characteristics. Dent Clin North Am. (2017) 61(4):669–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.05.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Khan AS, Syed MR. A review of bioceramics-based dental restorative materials. Dent Mater J. (2019) 38(2):163–76. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Choi A, Yoo KH, Yoon SY, Park BS, Kim IR, Kim YI. Anti-microbial and remineralizing properties of self-adhesive orthodontic resin containing mesoporous bioactive glass. Materials (Basel). (2021) 14(13):3550. doi: 10.3390/ma14133550

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Melo MAS, Cheng L, Zhang K, Weir MD, Rodrigues LKA, Xu HHK. Novel dental adhesives containing nanoparticles of silver and amorphous calcium phosphate. Dent Mater. (2013) 29(2):199–210. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.10.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Cheng L, Weir MD, Xu HHK, Kraigsley AM, Lin NJ, Lin-Gibson S, et al. Antibacterial and physical properties of calcium-phosphate and calcium-fluoride nanocomposites with chlorhexidine. Dent Mater. (2012) 28(5):573–83. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.01.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Nakipoglu M, Tezcaner A, Contag CH, Annabi N, Ashammakhi N. Bioadhesives with antimicrobial properties. Adv Mater. (2023) 35(49):e2300840. doi: 10.1002/adma.202300840

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Imazato S. Bio-active restorative materials with antibacterial effects: new dimension of innovation in restorative dentistry. Dent Mater J. (2009) 28(1):11–9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.11

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Toledano M, Osorio R, Vallecillo-Rivas M, Osorio E, Lynch CD, Aguilera FS, et al. Zn-doping of silicate and hydroxyapatite-based cements: dentin mechanobiology and bioactivity. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. (2021) 114:104232. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104232

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nagakane K, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Shirai K, et al. Analysis of chemical interaction of 4-MET with hydroxyapatite using XPS. Dent Mater J. (2006) 25(4):645–9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.25.645

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Taira Y, Imai Y. Review of methyl methacrylate (MMA)/tributylborane (TBB)-initiated resin adhesive to dentin. Dent Mater J. (2014) 33(3):291–304. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2013-320

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ito S, Iijima M, Motai F, Mizoguchi I, Saito T. Effects of calcium salts of acidic monomers on mineral induction of phosphoprotein immobilized to agarose beads. J Biomed Mater Res A. (2012) 100(10):2760–5. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34212

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Thaweboon S, Saito T, Thaweboon B. Anti-biofilm formation of an adhesive containing calcium salts of acidic monomers against oral Candida related to root caries. Key Eng Mater. (2021) 904:282–6. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.904.282

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Qiu Y, Saito T. Novel bioactive adhesive monomer CMET promotes odontogenic differentiation and dentin regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22(23):12728. doi: 10.3390/ijms222312728

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Rao Y, Qiu Y, Altankhishig B, Matsuda Y, Hasan MR, Saito T. Novel universal bond containing bioactive monomer promotes odontoblast differentiation in vitro. J Funct Biomater. (2023) 14(11):506. doi: 10.3390/jfb14100506

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. International Organization for Standardization. Implants for surgery — in vitro evaluation for apatite-forming ability of implant materials. ISO 23317:2014. Geneva: ISO (2014).

Google Scholar

22. Matsuda Y, Komatsu H, Murata Y, Tanaka T, Sano H. A newly designed automatic pH-cycling system to simulate daily pH fluctuations. Dent Mater J. (2006) 25(2):280–5. doi: 10.4012/dmj.25.280

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Matsuda Y, Murata Y, Tanaka T, Komatsu H, Sano H. Development of new software as a convenient analysis method for dental microradiography. Dent Mater J. (2006) 26(3):414–21. doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.414

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Butler WT, Brunn JC, Qin C. Dentin extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins: comparison to bone ECM and contribution to dynamics of dentinogenesis. Connect Tissue Res. (2003) 44(Suppl 1):171–8. doi: 10.1080/03008200390152287

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Shirley B, Jarochowska E. Chemical characterisation is rough: the impact of topography and measurement parameters on energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy in biominerals. Facies. (2022) 68(7):7. doi: 10.1007/s10347-022-00645-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Alhothali MM, Exterkate RAM, Lagerweij MD, van Strijp AJP, Buijs MJ, van Loveren C. The effect of various fluoride products on dentine lesions during pH-cycling. Caries Res. (2022) 56(1):64–72. doi: 10.1159/000521453

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Fernando D, Attik N, Pradelle-Plasse N, Jackson P, Grosgogeat B, Colon P. Bioactive glass for dentin remineralization: a systematic review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. (2017) 76:1369–77. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.083

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Saffarpour M, Mohammadi M, Tahriri M, Zakerzadeh A. Efficacy of modified bioactive glass for dentin remineralization and obstruction of dentinal tubules. J Dent (Tehran). (2017) 14(4):212–22.29285031

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

29. Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S. Caries preventive effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP): a meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. (2009) 67(6):321–32. doi: 10.1080/00016350903160563

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Baymiev AK, Baymiev AK, Kuluev BR, Shvets KY, Yamidanov RS, Matniyazov RT, et al. Modern approaches to differentiation of live and dead bacteria using selective amplification of nucleic acids. Microbiology. (2020) 89(1):17–33. doi: 10.1134/S0026261720010038

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Mazurel D, Brandt BW, Boomsma M, Crielaard W, Lagerweij M, Exterkate RAM, et al. Streptococcus mutans and caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. (2025) 2:220345241303880. doi: 10.1177/00220345241303880

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Chen L, Ma L, Park NH, Shi W. Cariogenic actinomyces identified with a beta-glucosidase-dependent green color reaction to Gardenia jasminoides extract. J Clin Microbiol. (2001) 39(8):3009–12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.3009-3012.2001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Komiyama K, Khandelwal RL. Acid production by Actinomyces viscosus of root surface caries and non-caries origin during glycogen synthesis and degradation at different pH levels. J Oral Pathol Med. (1992) 21(8):343–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1992.tb01362.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Wen ZT, Huang X, Ellepola K, Liao S, Li Y. Lactobacilli and human dental caries: more than mechanical retention. Microbiology (Reading). (2022) 168(6):001196. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001196

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Ebisu S, Tay FR. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater. (2003) 19(4):313–19. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00060-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Sebastian R, Paul ST, Azher U, Reddy D. Comparison of remineralization potential of casein phosphopeptide: amorphous calcium phosphate, nano-hydroxyapatite and calcium sucrose phosphate on artificial enamel lesions: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. (2022) 15(1):69–73. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2339

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Iwasaki T, Kubochi K, Takata H, Komine F. Assessment of bond strength and bioactivity on a prototype resin-based luting agent containing a novel bioactive monomer. Odontology. (2025) 113:1107–18. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01053-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: CMET, Bioactive Universal Bond, mineralization, anti-demineralization, antibacterial effect, multifunctional material

Citation: Altankhishig B, Matsuda Y, Rao Y and Saito T (2025) Mineralization, anti-demineralization, and antibacterial effects of novel Bioactive Universal Bond with calcium salt monomers on dental caries. Front. Dent. Med. 6:1633158. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2025.1633158

Received: 22 May 2025; Accepted: 28 August 2025;
Published: 15 September 2025.

Edited by:

Yosi Kusuma Eriwati, University of Indonesia, Indonesia

Reviewed by:

Rafiqul Islam, Hokkaido University, Japan
Cigdem Atalayin Ozkaya, Ege University, Türkiye
Siti Sunarintyas, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia

Copyright: © 2025 Altankhishig, Matsuda, Rao and Saito. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Takashi Saito, dC1zYWl0b0Bob2t1LWlyeW8tdS5hYy5qcA==

These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.