Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Dent. Med.

Sec. Systems Integration

Are ChatGPT, My AI Snapchat, and Metaverse used by dental students as reliable sources of dental education?

Provisionally accepted
  • 1RAK Medical & Health Sciences University, Ras Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
  • 2Assiut University, Asyut, Egypt
  • 3Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  • 4Centre of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman, United Arab Emirates., Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  • 5Universidade de Taubate, Taubaté, Brazil
  • 6SIMATS Deemed University Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

A profound understanding of dental students' use of artificial intelligence (AI) applications and their perceptions is essential for promoting responsible adoption and guiding integration into dental education. Aim: This study evaluated dental students' perceptions, usage patterns, and trust in ChatGPT, Snapchat's My AI, and the Metaverse as educational tools. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to undergraduate dental students at RAK College of Dental Sciences, United Arab Emirates, between February and May 2024. The questionnaire comprised 29 questions organized into five sections. The questions were formulated as multiple-choice questions. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Pearson's chi-square tests with post-hoc adjusted standardized residuals (ASRs) and Bonferroni corrections examined categorical associations. Ordinal logistic regression assessed predictors of AI awareness, and paired-samples t-tests with Cohen's d compared trust in ChatGPT versus Snapchat AI. Results: The response rate was 57%, of which 70% were females. Self-rated awareness of AI increased across academic years, with fifth-year students rating their awareness score as 4 ± 0.9 out of 5, compared to 3 ± 1.4 in the first year. Ordinal regression showed no significant effects of year, gender, or their interaction (p > 0.19). ChatGPT was the most used tool (81.5%), followed by grammar correction tools (75%) and Snapchat AI (74.4%), while Metaverse use was limited (28.6%). Chi-square analyses confirmed significantly greater use of ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Snapchat AI compared with Metaverse (p < 0.001). Fourth-year students most often used AI for academic or clinical purposes (41.7%). Educational potential was endorsed by 78% of students, while privacy and data security were the predominant concerns (78%). Compared with Snapchat AI, ChatGPT was significantly more often used for education, preferred for quick responses, and more frequently associated with positive beliefs about future learning. Paired-samples t-tests demonstrated consistently higher trust in ChatGPT across all academic years, with moderate-to-large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.67–0.91; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Dental students reported widespread adoption and higher trust in ChatGPT compared to other AI tools. While recognizing its educational potential, concerns about accuracy and privacy underscore the need for integrating AI literacy and evidence-based evaluation into dental curricula.

Keywords: ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, My AI Snapchat, Metaverse, Dental students, dental education

Received: 26 Jul 2025; Accepted: 25 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Elsayed, BAROUDI, Patni, Elwakil, Nallan and Karobari. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: KUSAI BAROUDI

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.