Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Dent. Med.

Sec. Dental Materials

This article is part of the Research TopicBiomaterials for Dental Caries Prevention and ManagementView all 6 articles

Xylotrupes Gideon Microchitosan-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: In Vitro Assessment of Mechanical Properties

Provisionally accepted
Rosalina  TjandrawinataRosalina Tjandrawinata1*Florencia  Livia KurniawanFlorencia Livia Kurniawan1Carolina  Damayanti MarpaungCarolina Damayanti Marpaung1Deviyanti  PratiwiDeviyanti Pratiwi1Eddy  EddyEddy Eddy1Tansza  Setiana PutriTansza Setiana Putri1Komariah  KomariahKomariah Komariah1Indrayadi  GunardiIndrayadi Gunardi1Sastra  Kusuma WijayaSastra Kusuma Wijaya2Arief  CahyantoArief Cahyanto3
  • 1Universitas Trisakti, West Jakarta, Indonesia
  • 2Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • 3Ajman University of Science and Technology College of Dentistry, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Glass ionomer cements (GIC) are valued as inherent fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials, while chitosan binds to negatively charged enamel surfaces, promoting mineral deposition and strengthening teeth. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of GIC modified with microchitosan derived from Xylotrupes gideon, using an in vitro experimental design. This study uniquely employs micro‑scaled chitosan derived from the exoskeleton of Xylotrupes gideon, an insect‑based, locally sourced, and environmentally sustainable alternative to conventional marine chitosan, to reinforce a conventional GIC. Materials and Methods: Microchitosan was extracted from Xylotrupes gideon and incorporated into conventional GIC at 0.5%, 1% and 2% (w/w). Compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and surface microhardness were measured using standard testing equipment after immersion in artificial saliva for 24 hours and 7 days. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Games-Howell post hoc test, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The 1% microchitosan-modified GIC exhibited the most significant improvements compared to the unmodified control. After 7 days, compressive strength increased by 35.4%, diametral tensile strength by 51.3%, and surface hardness by 46.6% (p<0.05). These enhancements are attributed to microscale reinforcement and chemical bonding between microchitosan and the GIC matrix. Conclusion: The addition of 1% microchitosan derived from Xylotrupes gideon significantly improved the mechanical performance of GIC. This bioactive reinforcement shows promising potential for clinical restorative applications, though further investigation into its long-term biocompatibility and fluoride release is warranted. These findings highlight a novel combination of insect‑derived micro‑scale chitosan and conventional GIC, yielding mechanical gains comparable to those reported for nanochitosan‑modified formulations while relying on a more sustainable chitosan source.

Keywords: mechanical properties1, compressive strength2, diametral tensile strength3, glassionomer cement4, hardness5, microchitosan6, Xylotrupes Gideon7

Received: 08 Oct 2025; Accepted: 03 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tjandrawinata, Kurniawan, Marpaung, Pratiwi, Eddy, Putri, Komariah, Gunardi, Wijaya and Cahyanto. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rosalina Tjandrawinata

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.