- 1Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
- 2Jianwei Scientific Instruments (Anhui) Technology Co., Ltd., Hefei, China
Resistive electrodes are a critical component of Micro-Pattern Gaseous Detectors (MPGDs) for dealing with discharges. This study introduces an advanced approach using germanium (Ge) thin films as resistive anodes in MPGDs. The Ge films are fabricated via vacuum thermal evaporation, which enables the production of large-area and uniform on rigid substrates. Characterization confirms the film stability for over 700 days, which is attributed to surface passivation. It also reveals an inverse correlation between resistivity and temperature. Micromegas detectors equipped with Ge resistive anodes achieve high gain, low spark rate and high rate capability. These results validate Ge-film resistive anodes as a reliable and scalable technology for improving the performance and stability of MPGDs in future particle physics experiments.
1 Introduction
The evolving demands of future particle and nuclear physics experiments are driving factors for the development of new detectors and the advancement of existing technologies. Micro-Pattern Gaseous Detectors (MPGDs) have been extensively studied and widely used since the advantages of MPGDs. These include a large effective area at low cost, high-rate capability, radiation resistance, good spatial resolution and time resolution. However, the continuous increase in particle energy and luminosity is creating extremely challenging environments. These are characterized by high rates and intense irradiation backgrounds. As a result, MPGDs are required to meet more stringent performance criteria, such as improved stability, higher gain, and enhanced spatial and time resolution. Among these requirements, stability against discharges is particularly critical. Discharges can damage the detectors and the associated readout electronics. The introduction of resistive electrodes in MPGDs has effectively addressed this issue. This development has significantly enhanced the stability of MPGDs in high-demand experimental environments.
Various innovative methods and materials have been studied to fabricate resistive electrodes, such as resistive paste (RP) (Chefdeville et al. 2021; Alexopoulos et al. 2011), diamond-like carbon (DLC) films (Lv et al. 2020; Bencivenni et al. 2018), and germanium (Ge) films, which were first explored in parallel plate chambers (PPCs) (Bellazzini et al. 1986). Promising results for conventional MPGDs and new structures based on these resistive electrodes have been reported. A comparison of Ge films and DLC films as resistive anodes is shown in Table 1 (RP is excluded as it has not been a mainstream resistive material for MPGDs in recent years). It should be noted that the data in this table reflects the current state of research progress. Advancements in larger-scale or next-generation coating equipment may alter these performance benchmarks in the future. Among these materials, Ge films offer several distinct advantages, such as reliable resistivity controllability, a wide adjustment range, large-area fabrication directly on both soft and rigid substrates, cost efficiency, and simple operation. Notably, prototype detectors, specifically resistive Micromegas detectors (Feng et al. 2021) equipped with Ge anodes have demonstrated high performance, such as high gain and long-term stability. These detectors have been successfully validated in various application scenarios. For example, in the PandaX-III experiment (Wen et al. 2024), the resistive Micromegas made via the thermal bonding method can achieve a high gain in a high-pressure (up to 10 bar) time projection chamber (TPC). In addition, 40 cm
Building on our previous work, which first demonstrated the thermal bonding method for integrating Ge films into Micromegas detectors (Feng et al., 2021) and reported initial performance of Ge film resistive anodes (Feng et al., 2022), this study advances the field through three key, previously unaddressed contributions. First, it for the first time reveals the formation mechanism of Ge films as resistive anodes, providing fundamental insights into the structural and electronic origins of its resistive properties. Second, it offers a refined understanding of the early-stage surface oxidation and passivation of Ge films over extended long-term studies, and establishing its correlation with temperature variations across seasonal cycles. Third, extensive detector fabrication and experimental validation—encompassing long-term stability, gain, and rate capability—have comprehensively verified the feasibility of Ge films. In section 2, the manufacture method using vacuum thermal evaporation is first introduced, followed by a presentation of the Ge film properties, including non-uniformity, stability, and the dependence of surface resistivity on film thickness. Subsequently, the promising results of resistive Micromegas detectors with Ge films are demonstrated in the next section.
2 Manufacturing and characterization of germanium coatings
2.1 Manufacture method
Ge films are deposited on rigid substrates to form a thin resistive electrode by vacuum thermal evaporation via an electromagnetic heater or electron beam. An OFTC-1300 coating system was used for Ge film coating, which is shown in Figure 1. The source material for vacuum thermal evaporation is a pure single crystal of Ge with a purity of 99.9999%. The Ge target is housed in a container made of tungsten. The coating chamber is pumped to approximately 1
The bulk resistivity of crystalline Ge sources ranges from several tens of
Figure 2. Raman spectrum of Ge films before (Red curve) and after (Blue curve) anneal treatment, as well as the Ge target (Black curve).
2.2 Characteristics of germanium films
2.2.1 Non-uniformity
Large-area MPGDs are in high demand for future particle physics experiments, highlighting the critical need for large-area, high-performance resistive electrodes. With the large coating system (as shown in Figure 1), the effective area of Ge films has been successfully expanded to 60
Figure 3. Surface resistivity measurement: (a) Picture of the measurement. (b) Results of the measurement.
2.2.2 Variation of surface resistivity with time
A study of the temporal evolution of surface resistivity which is critical for the long-term stability of MPGDs, was also performed. Six Ge films of varying thicknesses (100, 200, 300, 400, 600, and 1000 nm) were coated on substrates from the same batch of PCBs. The surface resistivities of all the samples were measured repeatedly at the same position over several days, with concurrent records of temperature and other relevant parameters. All the samples were stored in a dry air environment with 25% relative humidity between tests.
The test results are presented in Figure 4. The red curve denotes the ambient temperature recorded during testing, while the remaining data points correspond to the different Ge film thicknesses, respectively. As can be seen, the surface resistivity increased to 2-3 times higher than its initial value within the first 2–3 months. This increase is ascribed to the gradual oxidation of the Ge films in air. Subsequently, the formation of a stable oxide passivation layer led to stabilization of the resistivity, which remained within a certain range throughout the approximately 700-day monitoring period. In addition, a clear negative correlation was observed between temperature and surface resistivity. At near-room temperatures, increasing the temperature leads to a continuous rise in carrier concentration within the Ge film, accompanied by a slight decrease in carrier mobility (Jing et al. 2009). Notably, the enhancement in carrier concentration exerts a more dominant influence on conductivity—ultimately resulting in a reduction in the surface resistivity.
Figure 4. The variation of surface resistivity with time for different Ge films. The red curve denotes the ambient temperature recorded throughout the testing period, while the remaining data points correspond to Ge films of different thicknesses, respectively.
2.2.3 Dependence of surface resistivity on thickness
To evaluate the relationship between the surface resistivity and the thickness of Ge films, the mean resistivity values from days 100–700 were averaged. The results are shown in Figure 5, where the x-axis represents the thickness and the y-axis shows the surface resistivity. The error bars represent the root mean square of the measured values. A clear inverse correlation was observed between the surface resistivity and the thickness of Ge films. The results demonstrate that the surface resistivity can be tuned from tens of M
Figure 5. Surface resistivity as a function of Ge films thickness. The error bars represent the RMS of the measured values over the period from day 100 to day 700.
3 Performance of micromegas detectors with germanium films
High-performance resistive films with large area, uniformity, stability, and controllable resistivity are essential for enhancing the performance of MPGDs. The Micromegas detectors based on the thermal bonding method were developed by the University of Science and Technology of China. Figure 6 shows a schematic view of a resistive Micromegas detector and the thermal bonding method. The Ge film coated on the top layer of an FR-4 substrate is used as the resistive layer. It is separated from the readout layer by an insulating layer. The thickness of the insulating layer is approximately 80 µm. Ge films are connected to an external electrode through some grounding nets for grounding or applying high voltage. The charges produced during the electron avalanche processes are evacuated through these nets.
Using the thermal bonding method with Ge films, we fabricated multiple prototypes and successfully scaled the maximum effective area to 60
Figure 7 shows the gain results of resistive Micromegas prototypes with different sizes, working gas and gas pressures for 5.9 keV X-rays. All the tests were conducted in a laboratory environment, without making any adjustments for external temperature and atmospheric pressure. The Ge films in these prototypes were all fabricated to a thickness of 400 nm, yielding a surface resistivity of approximately 100 M
Figure 7. The Gain results of different resistive Micromegas prototypes for 55Fe X-rays. The specific parameters are: (a) 10 cm × 10 cm, 1 bar, Ne/CF4/C2H6 (80:10:10), (b) 32 cm × 32 cm, 1 bar, Ar/CO2 (93:7), (c) 20 cm × 20 cm, 10 bar, Ar/iC4H10 (96.5:3.5), and (d) 15 cm × 15 cm, 0.2/0.5 bar, Ar/CO2 (93:7). Error bars are smaller than the marker size and thus not visible.
The normalized gain as a function of counting rate was measured to evaluate the rate capability of the resistive Micromegas detectors. The test results are shown in Figure 8, where the Ge films of these detector are all grounded via the grid-dot case. The metal dots distributed at a pitch of 10 mm are used to connect the Ge film to the external electrode. The four curves represent different initial gains of approximately 3000, 6000, 16,000 and 36000 for 8 keV X-rays, respectively. As can be seen, the gain would decrease about 10% at a counting rate exceeding 3
Figure 8. Normalized gain plotted at different counting rate. The different curves represent different operation gains and the error bars are smaller than the marker size.
4 Conclusion
In this paper, we present a comprehensive study on the application of Ge films as resistive anodes for MPGDs, detailing the manufacturing process, key characteristics, and successful implementation in high-performance Micromegas detectors. The vacuum thermal evaporation method was demonstrated to be an effective technique for producing large-area Ge films. The scalability of the process was proven by the successful fabrication of uniform films with areas of up to 60
These high-quality Ge films were successfully integrated into Micromegas detectors via the thermal bonding method. The prototype demonstrated good results, including a high gain exceeding
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
XW: Investigation, Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft. ZZ: Writing – review and editing, Supervision. SW: Investigation, Writing – review and editing. JL: Writing – review and editing. MS: Writing – review and editing. YZ: Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 12522514, 12505215].
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the detector team of JIANWEI Scientific Instruments Technology Co., Ltd for their help on the detector fabrication and the deposition of Ge films. The authors wish to thank the group of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) Center for Micro and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication.
Conflict of interest
Author SW was employed by Jianwei Scientific Instruments (Anhui) Technology Co., Ltd.
The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Alexopoulos, T., Burnens, J., De Oliveira, R., Glonti, G., Pizzirusso, O., Polychronakos, V., et al. (2011). A spark-resistant bulk-micromegas chamber for high-rate applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 640, 110–118. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2011.03.025
Bellazzini, R., Betti, C., Brez, A., Carboni, E., Massai, M., and Torquati, M. (1986). A novel type of parallel plate chamber with resistive germanium anode and a two-dimensional readout. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 247, 445–452. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(86)90406-7
Bencivenni, G., De Oliveira, R., Felici, G., Gatta, M., Morello, G., Ochi, A., et al. (2018). Performance of μ-rwell detector vs resistivity of the resistive stage. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 886, 36–39. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2017.12.037
Chefdeville, M., de Oliveira, R., Drancourt, C., Geffroy, N., Geralis, T., Gkountoumis, P., et al. (2021). Development of micromegas detectors with resistive anode pads. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1003, 165268. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2021.165268
Fang, Z., Zhang, Z., Shi, B., Jiang, W., Liu, X., He, S., et al. (2023). A large area, high counting rate micromegas-based neutron detector for bnct. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1053, 168361. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2023.168361
Feng, J., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Qi, B., Wang, A., Shao, M., et al. (2021). A thermal bonding method for manufacturing micromegas detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 989, 164958. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2020.164958
Feng, J., Zhang, Z., Liu, J., Shao, M., and Zhou, Y. (2022). A novel resistive anode using a germanium film for micromegas detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1031, 166595. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2022.166595
Jing, C., Zhang, C., Zang, X., Zhou, W., Bai, W., Lin, T., et al. (2009). Fabrication and characteristics of porous germanium films. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 10, 065001. doi:10.1088/1468-6996/10/6/065001
Lv, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, J., Shao, M., Zhang, Z., Song, G., et al. (2020). Production and performance study of diamond-like carbon resistive electrode in mpgd. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 958, 162759. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2019.162759
Meng, Y., Wang, X., Liu, J., Shao, M., Zhang, Z., and Zhou, Y. (2025). Optimizing neon-based gas mixtures for two-stage amplification fast-timing micromegas detectors. JUSTC 55, 0407. doi:10.52396/justc-2025-0006
Sharma, S., Jain, S., Aggarwal, S., and Bhide, V. (1972). Structure and electrical resistivity of thin amorphous germanium films. J. Non-Crystalline Solids 7, 285–294. doi:10.1016/0022-3093(72)90029-4
Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, S., Shen, Z., Feng, C., Liu, J., et al. (2021). A high spatial resolution muon tomography prototype system based on micromegas detector. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 69, 78–85. doi:10.1109/tns.2021.3137415
Wang, Y., Liu, S., Yao, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., He, Z., et al. (2025). A mobile high spatial-resolution muography instrument based on large-area micromegas detectors. J. Appl. Phys. 138, 174902. doi:10.1063/5.0288077
Wen, S., Zhang, Z., Peng, Y., Han, K., Wang, S., Feng, C., et al. (2024). Design and fabrication of low background, high energy resolution thermal bonding micromegas detectors for the pandax-iii experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1062, 169206. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2024.169206
Keywords: germanium film, micromegas, micro-pattern gaseous detectors, resistive electrode, thermal bonding method
Citation: Wang X, Zhang Z, Wen S, Liu J, Shao M and Zhou Y (2026) Germanium thin films: a high-performance resistive anode for micro-pattern gaseous detectors. Front. Detect. Sci. Technol. 4:1764532. doi: 10.3389/fdest.2026.1764532
Received: 10 December 2025; Accepted: 22 January 2026;
Published: 03 February 2026.
Edited by:
Luca Moleri, Weizmann Institute of Science, IsraelReviewed by:
Ronaldo Bellazzini, National Institute of Nuclear Physics of Pisa, ItalyAntonio Serra, University of Salento, Italy
Copyright © 2026 Wang, Zhang, Wen, Liu, Shao and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhiyong Zhang, emh6aHlAdXN0Yy5lZHUuY24=
Zhiyong Zhang1*