ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Disaster Emerg. Med.
Sec. Disaster Medicine
Perceived Disaster Response Self-Efficacy of Emergency Medicine Residents
Provisionally accepted- 1Dubai Academic Health Corporation, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- 2Department of Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- 3Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Word count: 321 Abstract Word count: 277 Background: Emergency medicine (EM) residents play a frontline role in disaster and mass-casualty incident (MCI) response; however, few studies have examined their perceived self-efficacy and familiarity with key disaster-management protocols. This study evaluated whether a structured four-week course could enhance EM residents' self-efficacy, disaster knowledge, and preparedness. Specifically, we asked: (1) Does a structured disaster-medicine course improve EM residents' perceived self-efficacy in disaster response? and (2) Does it improve their knowledge of core preparedness concepts? We hypothesized that the course would yield a significant increase in self-efficacy and at least a 10 % improvement in knowledge. . Methods: A single-centre pre-test/post-test intervention was conducted among 30 EM residents enrolled in a four-week disaster-management course structured using the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) framework. The course integrated didactic sessions, online lectures by international faculty, and scenario-based tabletop exercises simulating MCI decision-making under time pressure. A validated questionnaire, adapted from the Emergency Preparedness Information Questionnaire, assessed self-efficacy, knowledge, and familiarity with hospital protocols before and after the course. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and correlation analyses in IBM SPSS (Version 21.0) Results: Among the 30 participants (76.7 % female), most were in their first or second postgraduate year. Baseline self-efficacy was low (mean = 2.4 / 5) but improved significantly post-course (mean = 3.6; p < 0.001). Participants demonstrated notable gains in knowledge of the Hospital Incident Command System, surge management, and disaster-plan activation triggers. While triage accuracy remained high (94.9 % → 95.2 %; p = 0.88), mean cycle time improved from 6.9 to 3.2 minutes—a nearly 50 % reduction that, although not statistically significant (p = 0.08), represents an operationally meaningful improvement. Conclusions: A focused, simulation-enhanced disaster management course significantly improved EM residents' perceived self-efficacy and familiarity with critical disaster protocols. These findings support integrating structured disaster-medicine curricula into residency programs and justify longitudinal follow-up to evaluate knowledge retention and real-world performance.
Keywords: Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Curriculum Design, Table-Top Exercise (TTX), Mass-Casualty Incident (MCI), Resident, Medical Education
Received: 06 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yousif, Al-Najjar, Hubloue and Abdel Hameid. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Azza Omer Yousif, azmyousif@gmail.com
Ives Hubloue, ives.hubloue@uzbrussel.be
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
