Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Disaster Emerg. Med., 10 September 2025

Sec. Disaster Medicine

Volume 3 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/femer.2025.1664857

Commentary: Mass gathering healthcare and safety: current knowledge and future directions


Georgi PopovGeorgi Popov1Khalid Eddahiri
&#x;Khalid Eddahiri2*
  • 1Department of Occupational Risk and Safety Sciences, University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, MO, United States
  • 2Center for Research and Training in Disaster Medicine, Humanitarian Aid, and Global Health (CRIMEDIM), University of Eastern Piedmont “Amedeo Avogadro”, Novara, Italy

A Commentary on
Mass gathering healthcare and safety: current knowledge and future directions

by Pigeon, M.-A., Demers, A.-J., and Ciottone, G. (2025). Front. Disaster Emerg. Med. 3:1615181. doi: 10.3389/femer.2025.1615181

Dear Prof. Ives Hubloue, Specialty Chief Editor, Disaster Medicine,

We have read with interest the bibliometric review by Pigeon et al. (1) titled “Mass gathering healthcare and safety: current knowledge and future directions.”, recently published in Frontiers in Disaster and Emergency Medicine. This timely review examines key challenges encountered by the healthcare response during mass gathering events (MGEs), emphasizing the need for specific training and the development of formal expertise tailored to MGEs. The authors also stress the importance of required improvement in specific areas such as psychosocial aspects, quality evaluation and management, and supervision.

However, despite its comprehensive and insightful nature, the title is somewhat misleading. The safety aspects and corresponding safety tools are not addressed sufficiently, and it is not clear whether the authors were referring to public safety or occupational safety. In the results section, the largest number of articles fall under the “public health and security” category but without any mention of “safety”. In this specific context, many authors report that safety and security are being used interchangeably, and, in many dictionaries, they are defined as synonyms (2). Obviously, both concepts may have a lot in common, and the following statement reported by Line et al. (3) seems a bit excessive: “two faculties have developed with a certain degree of rivalry between them. Security people maintain that the safety people are just a gang of old men who are unwilling to learn something new, the safety people retaliate that the security people are youngsters who haven't realized that they're re-inventing the wheel!” For the emergency management and occupational safety communities, the objective is not to focus on the semantic difference between the two words but on the existing complementariness and synergies. Obviously, the fundamental challenge facing security professionals is preventing losses, and the same challenges are shared with safety professionals.

In the broad sense, security can be considered as protecting a system against intentional disruptions often caused by malicious parties, and safety can be considered as protecting that same system against unintentional disruptions. Hazards led to safety incidents in the same way that vulnerabilities lead to security incidents (4). For a comprehensive system thinking approach, a security approach—which is largely threat-based and may be tempted to conduct assessments in isolation—will have to avoid missing the larger system's perspective.

On the other hand, this review does not include several established benchmarks and updated guidelines that, in our view, are essential to the current understanding of MGEs context. This is fully understandable given their relatively recent publication dates, mainly in 2025. For instance, the World Health Organization (WHO) Mass gathering practical guide for simulation exercises and after-action reviews, published on April 11th, 2025 (5), along with several systematic reviews (69) represent critical references that contribute to both theoretical and practical aspects of MGEs preparedness and management.

In conclusion, the discussion related to the definition and interdisciplinarity between safety and security remains open. For the time being, we will maintain that the inability of the system to affect its environment in an undesirable way is usually called safety; the inability of the environment to affect the system in an undesirable way is usually called security.

Yours sincerely,

Dr. Georgi Popov, CSP, QEP, SMP, ARM, CMC, FASSP, FAIHA Professor, Lead Auditor ISO 45001 and ISO 14001

Occupational Risk and Safety Sciences Department

University of Central Missouri

Author contributions

GP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KE: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

WHO, World Health Organization; MGE, Mass Gathering Event.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Author disclaimer

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the aforementioned institutions.

Abbreviations

WHO, World Health Organization; MGE, Mass Gathering Event.

References

1. Pigeon MA, Demers AJ, Ciottone G. Mass gathering healthcare and safety: current knowledge and future directions. Front Disaster Emerg Med. (2025) 3:1615181. doi: 10.3389/femer.2025.1615181

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Nas S. The definitions of safety and security. J ETA Maritime Sci. (2015) 3:53–4. doi: 10.5505/jems.2015.42713

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Line MB, Nordland O, Røstad L, Tøndel IA. Safety vs. Security? (PSAM-0148). In: Stamatelatos MG, Blackman HS. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM). New York: ASME Press (2006).

Google Scholar

4. Young W, Leveson N. Systems thinking for safety and security. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC '13). New York, NY: ACM. (2013). p. 1–8.

Google Scholar

5. World Health Organization (2025). Mass Gathering Practical Guide for Simulation Exercises and After Action Reviews. Geneva: WHO.

Google Scholar

6. Alhajri W, Templeton A, Moore A. Social norms and risks at mass gatherings: a systematic review. Int J Disast Risk Reduct. (2023) 88:103586. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103586

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Çalişkan C, Kuday AD, Özcan T, Dag N, Kinik K. Quantitative metrics in mass-gathering studies: a comprehensive systematic review. Prehosp. Disaster Med. (2024) 39:195–205. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X2400027X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. PoshtMashhadi A, Wood LC, Maghsoodi AI. The impact of mass gatherings and events on emergency department admissions: a systematic literature review. J Emerg Med. (2025) 74:23–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.02.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Sultana N, Crilly J, Ware RS, Ranse J. Factors influencing patient presentation and transfer to hospital rates during mass-gathering stadium events: a scoping review. Prehosp Disaster Med. (2025) 40:101–13. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X25000287

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mass gathering, safety, security, mass gathering event, major planned event

Citation: Popov G and Eddahiri K (2025) Commentary: Mass gathering healthcare and safety: current knowledge and future directions. Front. Disaster Emerg. Med. 3:1664857. doi: 10.3389/femer.2025.1664857

Received: 12 July 2025; Accepted: 18 August 2025;
Published: 10 September 2025.

Edited by:

Benoit Viault, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, France

Reviewed by:

Andrew Milsten, University of Massachusetts System, United States
Cara Taubman, Harlem Hospital Center, United States

Copyright © 2025 Popov and Eddahiri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Khalid Eddahiri, a2hhbGlkLmVkZGFoaXJpQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ==

ORCID: Khalid Eddahiri orcid.org/0009-0000-1477-2966

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.