Ofir Degani
Maggie Levy
Benjamin A. Horwitz- 1Plant Sciences Department, Migal - Galilee Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona, Israel
- 2Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Tel-Hai College, Tel Hai, Israel
- 3The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
- 4Faculty of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
Editorial on the Research Topic
Plant-friendly microorganisms as a bio-barrier against pathogens
Plants are exposed to a wide range of pathogenic species that coexist within complex microbial communities (Jones et al., 2019). The combinations of pathogens in these communities can exacerbate plant diseases. Alternatively, they may inhibit one another through antagonistic interactions. According to the classical disease triangle in phytopathology, disease development requires the interaction of a susceptible host, a virulent pathogen, and an environment conducive to disease progression. The plant microbiome plays a critical role in modulating both host resistance and the local environment in the plant host.
Microbial communities residing in seeds, the rhizosphere (the soil region adjacent to plant roots), and the phyllosphere (the plant’s aerial parts) consist of opportunistic pathogens and non-pathogenic organisms. These microbes, including diverse bacteria and fungi, may either cooperate or compete for plant-derived resources within shared ecological niches (Berg et al., 2020). Importantly, some of these endophytes and other microbiome constituents can suppress pathogens, thus promoting plant health (Degani et al.; Srivastava et al., 2025). Understanding the structure and function of these microbial communities under varying biotic and abiotic stress conditions offers promising new avenues for biological disease control.
Indeed, agriculture faces increasing pressure to reduce reliance on chemical pesticides while maintaining crop productivity under rising biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Beneficial microorganisms, including plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria such as Bacillus velezensis (Wockenfuss et al.) and fungi such as Trichoderma spp. (Akanksha et al.) and the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium (Mesquita et al.), offer a promising alternative by serving as a first line of defense, forming a dynamic and responsive bio-barrier that suppresses pathogens and enhances plant resilience (Mendes et al., 2011; Srivastava et al., 2025).
In this Research Topic, Akanksha et al. optimized the production and characterization of chitinase enzymes from Trichoderma spp. and demonstrated their strong antifungal activity against soil-borne pathogens affecting apple nurseries, with T. atroviride UHFTA005 showing the highest in vitro and in vivo disease suppression. These findings highlight the potential of Trichoderma-derived chitinases as effective biocontrol agents in the framework of managing apple root diseases in Himachal Pradesh, India. Likewise, Wockenfuss et al. showed that Bacillus velezensis, isolated from agricultural soil, exhibits strong in vitro antifungal activity against several plant pathogenic fungi and an oomycete. The bacterium alters fungal development, disrupting normal hyphal growth and appressoria formation, suggesting its potential as a broad-spectrum biocontrol agent. Even more so, pathogens’ interactions can affect disease severity, as demonstrated by Degani et al. The research explored interactions between Magnaporthiopsis maydis and newly identified endophytic fungi isolated from sweet corn seeds. Several isolates, including Fusarium sp. and Aspergillus species, demonstrated antagonistic activity against M. maydis, suggesting that native seed microflora may serve as a basis for novel biocontrol strategies. The benefits of root symbionts can extend to controlling parasitic insects as well. Mesquita et al. reviewed the potential of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium, which plays a key role in Brazilian sugarcane agriculture due to its insecticidal properties and activity as a plant growth-promoting symbiont.
Microbial communities contribute to plant disease suppression through competitive exclusion, production of antagonistic metabolites, and modulation of host immune responses. Numerous studies have demonstrated that pathogen attack can trigger plants to recruit beneficial microbes via root exudates (Rolfe et al., 2019; Chepsergon and Moleleki, 2023). The mechanisms underlying this microbe-mediated protection include antibiosis, whereby beneficial microbes produce antimicrobial compounds that inhibit pathogen growth; niche competition, in which early colonizers efficiently utilize nutrients and occupy ecological niches, thereby excluding pathogens (Degani et al.; Srivastava et al., 2025). Furthermore, beneficial microbes can induce systemic resistance, mainly through the jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling pathways, priming, in this way, the plant’s defensive capacity against a broad range of pathogens (Compant et al., 2025). Key taxa studied in this Research Topic and related works include: Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas fluorescens with robust colonization and bioactive metabolite production (Degani et al.; Wockenfuss et al.) (Mendes et al., 2011; Rabbee et al., 2023). Additionally, Trichoderma spp. and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have dual roles in pathogen suppression and abiotic stress mitigation (Akanksha et al.) (Jin and Alberti, 2025). Implementing microbial bio-barriers offers several benefits, including reduced dependency on synthetic fungicides, enhanced plant growth, nutrient uptake, stress resilience, and compatibility with integrated pest management and organic practices (Vishwakarma et al., 2020). Lab and field trials indicate that consortia of beneficial microbes significantly improve disease control efficacy when adapted to local soil and crop conditions compared to single-strain inoculants (Jones et al., 2019; Rolfe et al., 2019; Berg et al., 2020). The articles in this Research Topic illustrate plant-associated beneficial microbes’ ecological, biochemical, and practical roles in suppressing pathogens and enhancing crop health. Their multifunctionality offers an avenue for environmentally sound disease control strategies. Continued research is essential to optimize their use in diverse agroecosystems and contribute to the global transition toward sustainable agriculture.
Despite substantial progress, key research gaps remain: first, the inconsistency in the performance or effectiveness of a biocontrol treatment under real-world field conditions should be assessed. Many strains show promise in vitro or greenhouses but lose effectiveness under field conditions due to complex soil–plant–microbe interactions (Fadiji and Babalola, 2020). Second, understanding host–microbe recognition and stable root/endosphere colonization is essential for consistent performance (Wallace and May, 2018). Omics-based tools (e.g., metagenomics, metabolomics) should be employed to identify beneficial strains naturally antagonistic to pathogens, unravel their modes of action, and optimize synthetic microbial communities that function synergistically in the field. In this sense, nano-/formulation technologies that ensure stable, targeted delivery of bio-pesticides or their metabolites are essential. Finally, developing stable, scalable, and shelf-stable microbial products remains a critical challenge. We should ensure host specificity and safety, reducing risks of non-target effects or pathogen gene transfer.
Author contributions
OD: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ML: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. BH: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely appreciate all 17 contributing authors and the many reviewers whose valuable efforts were crucial for the successful publication of this Research Topic. We also thank the editorial team of Frontiers in Fungal Biology.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Berg G., Rybakova D., Fischer D., Cernava T., Vergès M.-C. C., Charles T., et al. (2020). Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 8, 1–22. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0
Chepsergon J. and Moleleki L. N. (2023). Rhizosphere bacterial interactions and impact on plant health. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 73, 102297. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102297
Compant S., Cassan K., Kostić T., Johnson L., Brader G., Trognitz F., et al. (2025). Harnessing the plant microbiome for sustainable crop production. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 23, 9–23. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01079-1
Fadiji A. E. and Babalola O. O. (2020). Elucidating mechanisms of endophytes used in plant protection and other bioactivities with multifunctional prospects. Front. Bioengineering Biotechnol. 8, 467. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00467
Jin S. and Alberti F. (2025). Advances in the discovery and study of Trichoderma natural products for biological control applications. Natural Product Rep. doi: 10.1039/D5NP00017C
Jones P., Garcia B. J., Furches A., Tuskan G. A., and Jacobson D. (2019). Plant host-associated mechanisms for microbial selection. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 862. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00862
Mendes R., Kruijt M., De Bruijn I., Dekkers E., van der Voort M., Schneider J. H., et al. (2011). Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332, 1097–1100. doi: 10.1126/science.1203980
Rabbee M. F., Hwang B.-S., and Baek K.-H. (2023). Bacillus velezensis: a beneficial biocontrol agent or facultative phytopathogen for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy 13, 840. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13030840
Rolfe S. A., Griffiths J., and Ton J. (2019). Crying out for help with root exudates: adaptive mechanisms by which stressed plants assemble health-promoting soil microbiomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 49, 73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.003
Srivastava A. K., Singh R. D., Pandey G. K., Mukherjee P. K., and Foyer C. H (2025). Unravelling the molecular dialogue of beneficial microbe− plant interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 48(4), 2534–2548.
Vishwakarma K., Kumar N., Shandilya C., Mohapatra S., Bhayana S., and Varma A. (2020). Revisiting plant–microbe interactions and microbial consortia application for enhancing sustainable agriculture: a review. Front. Microbiol. 11, 560406. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.560406
Keywords: biological control, crop protection, endophytes, plant disease, host-pathogen interaction, plant microbiome, microbial interactions, microorganism communities
Citation: Degani O, Levy M and Horwitz BA (2025) Editorial: Plant-friendly microorganisms as a bio-barrier against pathogens. Front. Fungal Biol. 6:1659453. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2025.1659453
Received: 04 July 2025; Accepted: 14 July 2025;
Published: 29 July 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Raffaella Maria Balestrini, National Research Council (CNR), ItalyCopyright © 2025 Degani, Levy and Horwitz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ofir Degani, ZC1vZmlyQG1pZ2FsLm9yZy5pbA==; Benjamin A. Horwitz, aG9yd2l0ekB0ZWNobmlvbi5hYy5pbA==