Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Health Serv.

Sec. Patient Centered Health Systems

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1497055

Standardizing patient-reported outcomes across diseases: development of a novel generic patient-reported outcome set and human needs assessment

Provisionally accepted
Preston  LongPreston Long1*Alize  RoggeAlize Rogge2Ann-Krisitn  PorthAnn-Krisitn Porth1Evelyn  GrossEvelyn Gross3Liselotte  FierensLiselotte Fierens4Belle  de RooijBelle de Rooij5Nadia  KammingaNadia Kamminga5Tanja  StammTanja Stamm1
  • 1Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 2Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
  • 3Austrian crohns disease assocaition, Vienna, Austria
  • 4Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • 5Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an essential component in the implementation of value-based health care. Up to now, no consensus exists on the appropriateness of PROs used across diseases, e.g., to allow for comparability or to assess disease impact. The aim of this study was to develop an international, multi-stakeholder consensus on a generic PRO set applicable for different stakeholders and diseases within of the Health Outcomes Observatory (H2O) project funded by the EU Innovative Medicines Initiative.To begin, a literature review was conducted to identify the most frequently utilized generic PROs followed by a three-round Delphi consensus procedure. The resulting outcome set was then cross-referenced with disease-specific outcome sets for lung and metastatic breast cancer, diabetes, and inflammatory bowel diseases to identify overlaps and gaps. Lastly, the identified generic outcome domains were mapped to the Max Neef's human needs model to explore the degree to which the generic domains address a general concept of wellbeing.The literature search resulted in 2357 articles from which 190 PROMs and their measured domains were extracted. The Delphi consensus procedure reduced these to 10 core domains (mental, physical and social wellbeing, overall health status, fatigue, pain, sleep quality, sexuality, self-efficacy, treatment satisfaction). In comparison to the human needs model, needs such as identity and leisure were disregarded.The H2O generic outcome set presents a disease-generic, domain-centered PRO framework building the groundwork for health data spaces and supporting consistency in treatment outcomes across different sites, settings, and patient populations.

Keywords: Quality of Life, Patient-reported outcome measures, wellbeing, Generic outcomes, H2O project

Received: 06 Nov 2024; Accepted: 13 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Long, Rogge, Porth, Gross, Fierens, de Rooij, Kamminga and Stamm. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Preston Long, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.