ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Health Serv.

Sec. Patient Safety

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1569550

This article is part of the Research TopicResponding to Harm with Compassion, Accountability and TransparencyView all 6 articles

A closer look at the role of apology in error disclosure: A simulation study

Provisionally accepted
Sarah  ShannonSarah Shannon1Sherry  EspinSherry Espin2Ben  DunlapBen Dunlap3Lynne  RobinsLynne Robins3Peggy  Soule OdegardPeggy Soule Odegard3Carolyn  ProutyCarolyn Prouty4Sara  KimSara Kim3Wendy  LevinsonWendy Levinson5Cara  Gray HelmerCara Gray Helmer6Thomas  GallagherThomas Gallagher3*
  • 1Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States
  • 2Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 3University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • 4The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington, United States
  • 5University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 6Washington State Hospital Association, Seattle, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The importance of open communication following harmful medical errors is widely accepted including the role of authentic apology. Yet, disclosure conversations remain difficult for clinicians and offering an authentic apology is challenging.To better understand how clinicians can improve disclosures and apologies by using simulation to observe the approach clinicians use in the initial disclosure, where and when apologies occur within these conversations, what content apologies are linked with, who apologizes, and how apologies differ by their timing within the overall disclosure conversation.Methods: Forty-nine simulations of physician-nurse teams from the U.S. and Canada were videotaped planning and disclosing either a medical or surgical error to a patient-actress. Data from the disclosure portions were coded and analyzed using Atlas-Ti to describe the communication approach clinicians use when disclosing errors and the occurrence and timing of apologies within those disclosures.Results: Ninety-eight clinicians participated: 38 MD-RN teams from the U.S. and 11 from Canada. Of the 49 total simulated error disclosures, 30 involved medical teams disclosing an insulin overdose; 19 were surgical teams disclosing a lost specimen. The average length of the error disclosure conversations was 9.8 minutes (range = 6.1 to 14.2 minutes) and tended to follow a similar roadmap. On average, teams offered 2-3 apologies per disclosure (range = 0-9).These apologies occurred at all points during the disclosures and were offered by both physician and nurse participants.

Keywords: Interprofessional, Patient Safety, Disclosure, error, apology Word Count: 4412

Received: 01 Feb 2025; Accepted: 12 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Shannon, Espin, Dunlap, Robins, Odegard, Prouty, Kim, Levinson, Helmer and Gallagher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Thomas Gallagher, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195-4550, Washington, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.