STUDY PROTOCOL article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Implementation Science
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1604809
Acceptability, feasibility and program outcomes of an equity-focused, adapted communitybased healthy lifestyle program for children, young people and their families in Perth, Western Australia: An implementation hybrid research protocol. Short title for running header: Community Healthy Lifestyle Program Protocol
Provisionally accepted- 1Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
- 2Child and Adolescent Health Service, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- 3The Kids Research Institute Australia, Nedlands, Australia
- 4Health Consumers' Council, Perth, Australia
- 5University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- 6Thriving in Motion, Perth, Australia
- 7Notre Dame University, Perth, Australia
- 8Centre for Evidence and Implementation, Melbourne, Australia
- 9National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 10Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- 11The University of Auckland, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- 12Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
- 13Duke Center for Childhood Obesity Research, Durham, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: International guidelines recommend multidisciplinary intervention programs for addressing childhood obesity. In Western Australia, community-based healthy lifestyle programs for children and young people are insufficient for demand, especially for those over-represented in obesity statistics relating to prevalence. This protocol outlines the implementation and evaluation of an adapted, evidenced, community-based program in Perth, Western Australia. Methods: Multiple-methods hybrid research, testing acceptability and feasibility of program scale-out and program participant outcomes. Study (1) Develop the adapted healthy lifestyle program with key partners and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander advisors for scale-out. Apply implementation strategies for program realisation, identify critical elements and outcomes to demonstrate program success, and cultural and place-based considerations for program acceptability. Study (2) Assess acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and local clinical outcomes of adapted healthy lifestyle program pilot. Evaluate the program with children and young people aged 4-16 years with obesity or overweight and weight-related comorbidities, seeking healthy lifestyle change. Weight-related assessments at baseline, 6- and 12-months with weekly sessions for 6 months (estimated n=245 over 22 months, accounting for 30% drop-out). Explore program experience via focus groups with children, young people and caregivers (~8-12 weeks post commencement (~50 program participants and caregivers)), ~6 months post commencement (~50 program completers and caregivers)), and evaluation survey (e.g., declined/dropped-out/completed). Engage with key partners to determine program feasibility for scale-up through workshops (~20 participants) and qualitative proformas (~80 respondents). Mixed model regression will be used to assess within-subject change in outcomes over time. Child health utility instruments will be used for cost-utility analysis. Study (3) Assess program scalability post-pilot. If determined feasible and acceptable, the program will be packaged to assist practitioners and policymakers with scale-up via exploration of currently available packages and key staff interviews. The overarching Replicating Effective Programs framework outlines the implementation stages and the tools and strategies being applied are presented. Qualitative data will be analysed using Framework Analysis. Discussion: Implementation outcomes will be determined by evaluating acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of scale for this healthy lifestyle program. Utilising implementation science, partnership-building and place-based and cultural considerations, this research will inform potential scale-up of equity-focused healthy lifestyle programs.
Keywords: Community-Based Participatory Research, Healthy lifestyle, Obesity, implementation science, health equity, Program Evaluation, Feasibility Studies
Received: 02 Apr 2025; Accepted: 27 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Smith, Paull, Iwanowski, Harris, Moullin, Jane, Bill, Kerr, Pollard, Pearson, Robinson, Furzer, Bear, Jackson, Mildon, Sevdalis, Norman, Curran, Grant, Armstrong and Anderson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Stephanie Smith, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.