ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Health Policy and Management
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1627319
Universal Health Coverage in Lebanon: Agenda Setting Using Kingdon's Model and a Proposed Legal Framework for Revenue Allocation
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 2American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- 3independent researcher, Beirut, Lebanon
- 4Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
PurposeBackground: Health systems globally aim for Universal Health Coverage (UHC), however progress toward UHC remains challenging in many countries. Despite previous unsuccessful parliamentary attempts to secure national commitment to a UHC plan in Lebanon, a renewed and revised effort is currently being made by a dedicated parliamentary committee. This study has two main objectives: to examine the emergence of the UHC bill as a priority on the Lebanese policy agenda using John Kingdon's Framework; and (2) to conduct a policy analysis using Bardach and Patashnik's eight-step framework to identify the most suitable funding option for the proposed UHC program. This study aimed to understand the emergence of this UHC bill on the Lebanese policy agenda and to conduct a policy analysis of its revenue allocation strategy from a legal perspective. Methods: Two policy analysis frameworks were applied: John Kingdon's model, commonly used to study agenda setting, and Bardach and Patashnik's eight-step framework, designed to evaluate policy options and recommend evidence-based solutionsJohn Kingdon's framework was used to examine how UHC emerged on the Lebanese policy agenda, while Bardach & Patashnik's framework analyzed evidence to identify the most suitable funding mechanism for this UHC bill. A qualitative document analysis was conducted using the READ approach drawing on secondary literature sources. Data triangulation was also used to ensure consensus and accuracy. Results: The document analysis identified the emergence of a window of opportunity for the UHC bill as the three streams aligned: mounting public pressure, the formation of a parliamentary committee, and evident political receptiveness through the involvement of multiple parties. Bardach & Patashnik's policy analysis framework identified earmarked excise taxes as the most suitable policy alternative for financing UHC in Lebanon.This study explains the emergence of an updated UHC bill on the Lebanese policy agenda while conducting a policy analysis of the earmarked excise taxed to fund UHC. To overcome anticipated challenges a legislative framework must be established to ensure transparency in funding and government accountability.
Keywords: Agenda setting, Kingdon Model, Bardach & Patashnik's Framework, Policy Analysis, Universal Health Coverage, Excise Taxes, Earmarked Taxes, Lebanon
Received: 14 May 2025; Accepted: 30 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Mouawad, Lteif, Mina and Karam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rita Karam, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.