ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Patient Centered Health Systems
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1642188
This article is part of the Research TopicChallenges, Opportunities & Outcomes of Patient-Oriented Research in Learning Health SystemsView all 11 articles
From Experience to a Learning Health System: Peer-to-Peer Perspectives and Implications for Healthcare Navigation in Alberta, Canada
Provisionally accepted- 1Alberta Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Support Unit, Calgary, Canada
- 2University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background Healthcare navigation services help individuals access timely and appropriate care within complex health systems, particularly those facing systemic and equity-related barriers. Understanding navigation experiences is essential to addressing service gaps and improving health outcomes. This study sought to examine lived experiences of navigation in Alberta to identify inequities within existing programs and to provide recommendations for strengthening person-centred navigation within a learning health system framework. Materials This is a qualitative, peer-to-peer, patient-oriented research (POR) study. The study design followed the PaCER process of SET-COLLECT-REFLECT. The SET phase engaged patient and public partners in discussions to co-design the research question and the study design. The COLLECT phase included focus groups and interviews with adult residents of Alberta who had been navigated (n=13) and those who had experience as healthcare navigators (n=13) in the Alberta healthcare system. The data were thematically analyzed identifying key themes and subthemes. REFLECT phase run two focus groups with COLLECT participants for member-checking. This approach yielded the recommendations. Results Out of the 26 participants over 75% were female (77% Navigated, 75% Navigators) aged 41-50 years old. Half of navigators provided their service for more than 5 years and received a specialized training in healthcare navigation. Themes identified: (1) participants situation and circumstances, (2) navigation experience, and (3) participants perspective; (4) need for healthcare navigators, (5) navigator role, (6) current best practices and challenges, and (7) training and support. Five recommendations included expanding the scope and enhancing awareness of navigation programs with personalized approach and embedded evaluation, developing and formalizing navigation training programs. Conclusion This study identified gaps and opportunities in healthcare navigation programs from both navigator and navigated perspectives. The findings provide patient-centred recommendations to strengthen navigation services, and their integration into Alberta's learning health system that can enhance equitable access, healthcare experiences, and outcomes.
Keywords: patient-centred care, patient navigation, Learning health systems, patient engagement, Peer-to-Peer
Received: 06 Jun 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Aghabayli, Nielssen, Zapata-Cardona, Ahmed, Ezemanahi, Parmar, Fahimi, Khan, Khan, Mendez Muniz, Osigwe, Zaidi, Shi, Nabil, Fairie and Santana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Fakhriyya Aghabayli, afakhriyya@keemail.me
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.