SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Health Policy and Management
This article is part of the Research TopicEquitable Vaccine Access and Pandemic Preparedness in AfricaView all 7 articles
Reasons for hesitancy and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination among the Congolese population: A Scoping Review
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Health Management and Policy, Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
- 2Environmental Health Department, Kinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
- 3Ministry of Public Health, Hygiene and Social Welfare Programme National, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
- 4Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- 5African Health Economics and Policy Association, Accra, Ghana
- 6Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- 7Departement of Community Medecine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Nigeria
- 8University of Manitoba Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Canada
- 9Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP), Nairobi, Kenya
- 10University of Pretoria School of Health Systems and Public Health, Pretoria, South Africa
- 11Health Sciences Institute, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Despite over 9.6 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses administered globally, vaccination access remains highly unequal. North America and Western Europe have over 50% vaccination coverage, contrasting sharply with African nations, like the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which has under 10%. This scoping review explores the key factors contributing to the low COVID-19 vaccination rate in the Congolese population. We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, searching PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus databases for peer-reviewed manuscripts published between 2019 and 2023. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, focused on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and access in DRC. Although surveys indicated a high willingness to be vaccinated, only 2,7 % were fully vaccinated. The primary barrier was safety concerns, specifically, perceptions of the vaccine as new and experimental (84,4%) and fear of side effects (83,3%). Additional hesitancy factors included mistrust in vaccine effectiveness (60,4%) and general lack of confidence (60,0%). Facilitators of acceptance included prior family vaccination, perceived risk of infection, belief in the virus's existence, and awareness of vaccination strategies. Sociodemographic factors such as being a healthcare professional or male also positively influenced uptake. These findings highlight the gap between vaccine willingness and actual coverage in the DRC. Addressing safety concerns and building trust through targeted outreach, especially among key professional groups, may improve vaccine acceptance and equity.
Keywords: acceptance, Hesitancy, COVID-19 vaccine, DRC, Scoping review
Received: 14 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 LOBUKULU LOLIMO, Khonde, Matondo, Kabele, Musawu, Beshah, Achala, Njeri, Adote, Zegeye, Mbachu, Ataguba, YAYA BOCOUM and Mayaka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: GENESE  LOBUKULU LOLIMO, kennedy.lobukulu@unikin.ac.cd
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
