ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Implementation Science
From Research to Practice: A Pilot Implementation Study of a Falls Self-Efficacy Tool in a Community Hospital
Provisionally accepted
- 1Singhealth Community Hospitals, Singapore, Singapore
- 2Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore
- 3Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Introduction Inpatient falls are serious adverse events that contribute to functional decline and adverse outcomes. Overconfidence in mobility, and reluctance to seek assistance, are often difficult for staff to detect in the absence of a structured tool. The Multidimensional Falls Efficacy Scale (MdFES) was developed to assess patients' confidence across fall prevention, recovery, and self-protection domains. This pilot implementation feasibility study evaluated the early adoption of the MdFES in a community hospital, using the Proctor Implementation Outcomes framework to examine patient and nurse perspectives. Methods A mixed-methods pilot was conducted in Singapore community hospitals involving 90 patients and 32 nurses. Quantitative data were collected across multiple implementation outcomes—including acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, cost, and fidelity—using structured questionnaires, with results reported as mean ± SD. Qualitative data from open-ended responses were thematically analysed to identify barriers and facilitators to MdFES implementation. Results Patients reported high acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)) = 17.48 ± 2.66) and appropriateness (Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)) = 17.54 ± 2.75), with 80% agreeing with their MdFES results and an average completion time of 3.12 ± 2.23 minutes, indicating low perceived burden. In contrast, nurses reported moderate acceptability (AIM = 12.72 ± 2.11), appropriateness (IAM = 13.19 ± 3.17), and feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM))= 13.47 ± 2.66), citing language barriers, cognitive limitations, and workflow constraints as key challenges. Fidelity was affected, with frequent rewording and translation required. Qualitative themes highlighted the need for translated versions, simplified wording, and workflow integration. Conclusion This pilot feasibility study demonstrates that the MdFES is acceptable and meaningful to patients, while revealing modifiable feasibility challenges for nurses. These early findings provide essential insights to guide workflow adaptations, stakeholder engagement, and contextual modifications required before proceeding to a larger-scale, multi-centre implementation study. (292 words)
Keywords: falls efficacy, implementation science, Patient-reported outcome measures, Rehabilitation, Patient Safety
Received: 29 Sep 2025; Accepted: 25 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tan, Lai, Soh, Ho, Zhao and Low. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yan Fang Cheryl Tan
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.